• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适应不良人格特质的潜在类别在社会处理方面表现出差异。

Latent classes of maladaptive personality traits exhibit differences in social processing.

机构信息

Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

Cognition and Philosophy Lab, Philosophy Department, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Pers. 2022 Aug;90(4):615-630. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12686. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1111/jopy.12686
PMID:34714935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9545362/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Social processing (SP) deficits manifest across numerous mental disorders. However, this research has been plagued by heterogeneity and a piecemeal approach whereby skills are examined in isolation rather than as part of an integrated cognitive system. Here, we combined two dimensional frameworks of psychopathology to address these limitations.

METHOD

We utilized the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) to distill trait-related heterogeneity within a community sample (n = 200), and the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) 'Systems for Social Processes' to comprehensively assess SP. We first applied latent class analyses (LCA) to derive AMPD-based groups and subsequently contrasted the performance of these groups on a SP test battery that we developed to align with the RDoC SP constructs.

RESULTS

Our LCA yielded four distinct subgroups. The recognizable trait profiles and psychopathological symptoms of these classes suggested they were clinically meaningful. The subgroups differed in their SP profiles: one displayed deficits regarding the self, a second displayed deficits in understanding others, a third displayed more severe deficits including affiliation problems, whilst the fourth showed normal performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the link between clusters of maladaptive personality traits and distinctive profiles of SP deficits, which may inform research on disorders involving SP dysfunctions.

摘要

目的

社会处理(SP)缺陷在许多精神障碍中表现出来。然而,这项研究受到异质性和零碎方法的困扰,即技能是孤立地检查的,而不是作为一个综合认知系统的一部分。在这里,我们结合了心理病理学的二维框架来解决这些局限性。

方法

我们利用人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)来提炼社区样本(n=200)中的特质相关异质性,并利用研究领域标准(RDoC)的“社会处理系统”来全面评估 SP。我们首先应用潜在类别分析(LCA)来得出基于 AMPD 的组,然后对比这些组在我们开发的与 RDoC SP 结构相匹配的 SP 测试组合上的表现。

结果

我们的 LCA 产生了四个不同的亚组。这些类别的可识别特质特征和精神病理症状表明它们具有临床意义。这些亚组在 SP 特征上存在差异:一个表现出自我缺陷,第二个表现出理解他人的缺陷,第三个表现出更严重的缺陷,包括隶属问题,而第四个表现出正常表现。

结论

我们的结果支持适应不良的人格特质集群与 SP 缺陷的独特特征之间的联系,这可能为涉及 SP 功能障碍的障碍研究提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e088/9545362/d453a00ecb3c/JOPY-90-615-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e088/9545362/52dfb8f05489/JOPY-90-615-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e088/9545362/d453a00ecb3c/JOPY-90-615-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e088/9545362/52dfb8f05489/JOPY-90-615-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e088/9545362/d453a00ecb3c/JOPY-90-615-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Latent classes of maladaptive personality traits exhibit differences in social processing.适应不良人格特质的潜在类别在社会处理方面表现出差异。
J Pers. 2022 Aug;90(4):615-630. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12686. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
2
Combining novel trait and neurocognitive frameworks to parse heterogeneity in borderline personality disorder.结合新颖的特质和神经认知框架来解析边缘型人格障碍的异质性。
J Pers. 2023 Dec;91(6):1344-1363. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12811. Epub 2023 Feb 5.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 'Systems for Social Processes' in borderline personality and substance use disorders.一项关于边缘型人格障碍和物质使用障碍中“社会过程系统”的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Aug;127:572-592. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.013. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
4
Global personality dysfunction and the relationship of pathological and normal trait domains in the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders.全球人格功能障碍以及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格障碍替代模型中病理性和正常特质领域的关系。
J Pers. 2022 Feb;90(1):34-46. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12560. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
5
From Structure to Process: On the Integration of AMPD and HiTOP.从结构到过程:AMPd 和 HiTOP 的整合。
J Pers Assess. 2019 Jul-Aug;101(4):360-366. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1501696. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
6
On the relationships between DSM-5 dysfunctional personality traits and social cognition deficits: A study in a sample of consecutively admitted Italian psychotherapy patients.论 DSM-5 功能失调人格特质与社会认知缺陷之间的关系:一项连续收治的意大利心理治疗患者样本研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Nov;24(6):1421-1434. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2091. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
Attachment, Mentalization, and Criterion B of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD).依恋、心理化与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的B标准
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2021 Aug 2;8(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40479-021-00163-9.
8
Profiles of theory of mind impairments and personality in clinical and community samples: integrating the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders.临床样本和社区样本中心理理论损伤与人格概况:整合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中人格障碍的替代模型
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 11;14:1292680. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1292680. eCollection 2023.
9
A personality-based latent class typology of outpatients with major depressive disorder: association with symptomatology, prescription pattern and social function.重度抑郁症门诊患者基于人格的潜在类别类型学:与症状学、处方模式及社会功能的关联
J Affect Disord. 2017 Aug 1;217:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.053. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
10
Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP.HiTOP 中的 AMPD 的标准 A
J Pers Assess. 2019 Jul-Aug;101(4):345-355. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1465431. Epub 2018 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Profiles of theory of mind impairments and personality in clinical and community samples: integrating the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders.临床样本和社区样本中心理理论损伤与人格概况:整合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中人格障碍的替代模型
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 11;14:1292680. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1292680. eCollection 2023.
2
Five-Factor Model and DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorder Profile Construction: Associations with Cognitive Ability and Clinical Symptoms.人格障碍剖析构建的五因素模型与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版替代模型:与认知能力及临床症状的关联
J Intell. 2023 Apr 8;11(4):71. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040071.

本文引用的文献

1
A unified online test battery for cognitive impulsivity reveals relationships with real-world impulsive behaviours.一种统一的在线认知冲动测试组合,揭示了与现实世界冲动行为的关系。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Nov;5(11):1562-1577. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01127-3. Epub 2021 May 27.
2
Metacognition and self-concept: Elaborating on a construct relation in first-grade children.元认知和自我概念:在一年级儿童中阐述一个建构关系。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0250845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250845. eCollection 2021.
3
Seven computations of the social brain.
社会脑的七种计算。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):745-760. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab024.
4
Latent profiles of patients with borderline pathology based on the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders.基于人格障碍的替代DSM-5模型的边缘性病理患者的潜在概况。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2021 Feb 11;8(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40479-021-00146-w.
5
Trait Aggression is Primarily a Facet of Antagonism: Evidence from Dominance, Latent Correlational, and Item-Level Analyses.特质攻击性主要是敌对性的一个方面:来自支配性、潜在相关性和项目层面分析的证据。
J Res Pers. 2020 Dec;89. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104042. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
6
Global personality dysfunction and the relationship of pathological and normal trait domains in the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders.全球人格功能障碍以及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格障碍替代模型中病理性和正常特质领域的关系。
J Pers. 2022 Feb;90(1):34-46. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12560. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
7
Mentalizing during social InterAction: A four component model.社交互动中的心理化:一个四成分模型。
Cortex. 2020 May;126:242-252. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.031. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8
Dysfunctional personality beliefs and emotion recognition in individuals with methamphetamine dependence.甲基苯丙胺依赖个体的功能失调人格信念和情绪识别。
Addict Behav. 2020 Jun;105:106336. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106336. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
9
Tapped out or barely tapped? Recommendations for how to harness the vast and largely unused potential of the Mechanical Turk participant pool.已枯竭还是尚未充分开发?关于如何利用 Mechanical Turk 参与者群体这一巨大但尚未充分开发的潜力的建议。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 16;14(12):e0226394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226394. eCollection 2019.
10
Difficulties with the conceptualization and assessment of Criterion A in the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorder: A reply to Morey (2019).DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型中 A 标准的概念化和评估困难:对 Morey(2019)的回应。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Oct;31(10):1200-1205. doi: 10.1037/pas0000758.