• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家韧性:一种新的自评评估量表。

National Resilience: A New Self-Report Assessment Scale.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tel Hai College, 12210, Tel Hai, Israel.

University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2019 May;55(4):721-731. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0362-5. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-018-0362-5
PMID:30600401
Abstract

The current paper presents a new self-report national resilience assessment scale (NRAS). The scale was constructed and validated using a sample of 1022 Jewish Israeli adults. The internal structure of the 25-item was determined by a Varimax factor analysis, which emitted four distinct factors pertaining to identifying with the state, solidarity and social justice, trust in national institutions and trust in public justice; which explained 61% of the variance. These factor scores were validated against two national resilience promoting factors (community resilience and sense of coherence), and two national resilience suppressing factors (distress symptoms and sense of danger); as well as four demographic characteristics (level of religiosity, political attitudes, income and level of exposure to terror/ war experiences in the last year). Results supported the validity of the NRAS and its four components, showing that it was consistently correlated with resilience promoting and resilience suppressing factors.

摘要

本文提出了一种新的自我报告的国家韧性评估量表(NRAS)。该量表是使用 1022 名以色列成年犹太人样本构建和验证的。25 项量表的内部结构通过方差极大因子分析确定,得出了与国家认同、团结和社会正义、对国家机构的信任以及对公共正义的信任相关的四个独特因素,解释了 61%的方差。这些因子分数与两个国家韧性促进因素(社区韧性和整体感)和两个国家韧性抑制因素(痛苦症状和危险感)以及四个人口统计学特征(宗教程度、政治态度、收入和去年接触恐怖/战争经历的程度)进行了验证。结果支持了 NRAS 及其四个组成部分的有效性,表明它与韧性促进和韧性抑制因素始终相关。

相似文献

1
National Resilience: A New Self-Report Assessment Scale.国家韧性:一种新的自评评估量表。
Community Ment Health J. 2019 May;55(4):721-731. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0362-5. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
2
Risk Factors as Major Determinants of Resilience: A Replication Study.作为复原力主要决定因素的风险因素:一项重复研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Nov;54(8):1228-1238. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0263-7. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
3
Measuring national resilience: A new short version of the scale (NR-13).衡量国家韧性:量表的新简版(NR-13)。
J Community Psychol. 2019 Apr;47(3):517-528. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22135. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
4
Predictors of individual, community and national resiliencies of Israeli Jews and Arabs.以色列犹太人和阿拉伯人个体、社区和国家韧性的预测因素。
Int J Psychol. 2020 Aug;55(4):553-561. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12636. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
Community Resilience of Civilians at War: A New Perspective.战争中平民的社区复原力:一个新视角。
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Jan;52(1):109-17. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9948-3. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
6
Post-traumatic Recovery to Distress Symptoms Ratio Mediates Relations of Resilience Fostering Resources and Their Predictors.创伤后恢复与痛苦症状比率介导了促进复原力资源及其预测因素之间的关系。
Stress Health. 2016 Aug;32(3):216-23. doi: 10.1002/smi.2594. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
7
Predictors of National and Community Resilience of Israeli Border Inhabitants Threatened by War and Terror.战争和恐怖威胁下以色列边境居民的国家和社区韧性的预测因素。
Community Ment Health J. 2020 Nov;56(8):1480-1488. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00592-w. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
8
Individual, Community, and National Resiliencies and Age: Are Older People Less Resilient than Younger Individuals?个体、社区和国家的复原力与年龄:老年人的复原力是否低于年轻人?
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;24(8):644-647. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
9
Resilience and coping during protracted conflict: a comparative analysis of general and evacuees populations.在长期冲突期间的韧性和应对:一般人群和疏散人群的比较分析。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Oct 3;13(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00642-8.
10
The 10-Item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale: Factorial Structure, Reliability, Validity, and Correlates Among Student Nurses in Southwestern Nigeria.10项Connor-Davidson韧性量表:尼日利亚西南部实习护士的因子结构、信度、效度及相关性
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):43-51. doi: 10.1177/1078390316629971.

引用本文的文献

1
Sense of coherence and religion/spirituality: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on a methodical classification of instruments measuring religion/spirituality.健康感知与宗教/灵性:基于宗教/灵性测量工具的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0289203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289203. eCollection 2023.
2
A systematic review of cross-cultural measures of resilience and its promotive and protective factors.跨文化韧性及其促进和保护因素的系统评价。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;60(4):733-750. doi: 10.1177/13634615231167661. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
3
Understanding Societal Resilience-Cross-Sectional Study in Eight Countries.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual, Community, and National Resiliencies and Age: Are Older People Less Resilient than Younger Individuals?个体、社区和国家的复原力与年龄:老年人的复原力是否低于年轻人?
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;24(8):644-647. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
2
Beyond PTSD: Socio-economic Bereavement in Tigray, Ethiopia.创伤后应激障碍之外:埃塞俄比亚提格雷地区的社会经济丧亲之痛
Anthropol Med. 2007 Apr;14(1):69-82. doi: 10.1080/13648470601106426.
3
Relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder, resilience, and religious orientation and practices among university student earthquake survivors in Haiti.
理解社会韧性——八个国家的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 1;10:883281. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.883281. eCollection 2022.
4
Hope and Fear of Threats as Predictors of Coping with Two Major Adversities, the COVID-19 Pandemic and an Armed Conflict.希望和对威胁的恐惧是应对两大逆境(COVID-19 大流行和武装冲突)的应对方式的预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 20;19(3):1123. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031123.
5
Bouncing back from COVID-19: Individual and ecological factors influence national resilience in adults from Israel, the Philippines, and Brazil.从新冠疫情中恢复:个人和生态因素影响以色列、菲律宾和巴西成年人的国家复原力。
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;32(3):452-475. doi: 10.1002/casp.2569. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
6
Morale and Perceived Threats as Predictors of Psychological Coping with Distress in Pandemic and Armed Conflict Times.士气和感知威胁是预测大流行和武装冲突时期心理困扰应对的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 19;18(16):8759. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168759.
7
Fluctuations in National Resilience during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间国家韧性的波动。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 7;18(8):3876. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083876.
8
Measurement and antecedents of national resilience in Filipino adults during coronavirus crisis.菲律宾成年人在冠状病毒危机期间的国家韧性的测量及其前因。
J Community Psychol. 2020 Nov;48(8):2608-2624. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22438. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
海地大学生地震幸存者中创伤后应激障碍、心理韧性与宗教取向及宗教活动之间的关系
Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2013;15(2):97-104.
4
Conjoint Community Resiliency Assessment Measure-28/10 items (CCRAM28 and CCRAM10): A self-report tool for assessing community resilience.联合社区弹性评估量表-28/10 项(CCRAM28 和 CCRAM10):用于评估社区弹性的自我报告工具。
Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Dec;52(3-4):313-23. doi: 10.1007/s10464-013-9596-0.
5
Individual and collective dimensions of resilience within political violence.政治暴力中的个体和集体韧性维度。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2013 Jul;14(3):235-54. doi: 10.1177/1524838013493520.
6
Resilience in children threatened by extreme adversity: frameworks for research, practice, and translational synergy.儿童在极端逆境下的韧性:研究、实践和转化协同的框架。
Dev Psychopathol. 2011 May;23(2):493-506. doi: 10.1017/S0954579411000198.
7
Community resilience and sense of coherence as protective factors in explaining stress reactions: comparing cities and rural communities during missiles attacks.社区韧性和社会凝聚力作为应激反应的保护因素的解释:在导弹袭击期间比较城市和农村社区。
Community Ment Health J. 2014 Feb;50(2):229-34. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9623-5. Epub 2013 Jun 9.
8
A lifespan perspective on terrorism: age differences in trajectories of response to 9/11.从寿命角度看恐怖主义:对 9/11 事件反应轨迹的年龄差异。
Dev Psychol. 2013 May;49(5):986-98. doi: 10.1037/a0028916. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
9
Terror, Resource Gains and Exclusionist Political Attitudes among New Immigrants and Veteran Israelis.新移民与以色列老兵中的恐惧、资源获取与排外政治态度
J Ethn Migr Stud. 2009 Jul;35(6):997-1014. doi: 10.1080/13691830902957759.
10
A New Stress-Based Model of Political Extremism: Personal Exposure to Terrorism, Psychological Distress, and Exclusionist Political Attitudes.一种基于压力的政治极端主义新模型:个人遭受恐怖主义、心理困扰与排外政治态度
J Conflict Resolut. 2009 Jun;53(2):363-389. doi: 10.1177/0022002709333296.