Suppr超能文献

戴原型扩展焦深接触镜的儿童的视力表现和调节/双眼功能。

Vision Performance and Accommodative/Binocular Function in Children Wearing Prototype Extended Depth-of-Focus Contact Lenses.

机构信息

Brien Holden Vision Institute (D.T., J.S., V.T., R.C.B.), Sydney, NSW, Australia; and School of Optometry and Vision Sciences (D.T., R.C.B.), Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Eye Contact Lens. 2019 Jul;45(4):260-270. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000570.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess two prototype contact lenses (CLs) that extend depth of focus through deliberate manipulation of multiple spherical aberration terms (extended depth-of-focus [EDOF]) for visual performance, accommodative and binocular function, and objective static near refraction against a single-vision (SV) CL.

METHOD

This was a prospective, randomized, cross-over, single-masked (participant) clinical trial in which 16 myopic children wore 2 prototype CLs (EDOFL/EDOFH) designed for presbyopes and a SV CL, each for one week. Measurements comprised monocular and binocular high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA: 6 m, 40 cm), binocular low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA: 6 m), contrast sensitivity (CS: 6 m), phorias (3 m, 33 cm), monocular-accommodative facility (33 cm), and objective static refraction (spherical equivalent M) at zero, -3, and -5 D vergences. Measurements were taken 10 min after lens insertion. Subjective response was assessed using take-home questionnaires comprising vision clarity (distance/intermediate/near), vision quality (haloes at night/ghosting), vision stability when moving (playing sport/using stairs), and comfort.

RESULTS

Single vision was significantly better than both EDOF CLs for monocular HCVA, LCVA, and CS (6 m); vision clarity (distance), ghosting (P≤0.040), and EDOFL for binocular HCVA (6 m, P=0.047). M was significantly closer to the ideal objective static refraction at -3 and -5 D vergences (P≤0.004) with both EDOF compared with SV CLs. There were no differences between CLs for any other variable (P≥0.169).

CONCLUSION

Extended depth-of-focus CLs caused minimal disruption to the accommodative and binocular system compared with SV CLs when worn by myopic children. Future EDOF designs for children should reduce the difference between SV for distance vision and vision quality while maintaining the same performance for intermediate and near.

摘要

目的

评估两款通过故意操控多个球差项(扩展景深[EDOF])来延长焦点深度的原型隐形眼镜(CL),以评估其在视觉表现、调节和双眼功能以及客观静态近距屈光度方面的性能,与单视(SV)CL 相比。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、交叉、单盲(参与者)临床试验,16 名近视儿童每人佩戴两种设计用于远视人群的原型 CL(EDOFL/EDOFH)和一种 SV CL,每种佩戴一周。测量包括单眼和双眼高对比度视力(HCVA:6 m,40 cm)、双眼低对比度视力(LCVA:6 m)、对比敏感度(CS:6 m)、隐斜视(3 m,33 cm)、单眼调节灵活性(33 cm)以及客观静态屈光度(等效球镜 M)在零、-3 和-5 D 屈光度下。测量在镜片插入后 10 分钟进行。使用带回家的问卷评估主观反应,问卷内容包括视力清晰度(远距离/中距离/近距离)、视力质量(夜间眩光/鬼影)、运动时的视力稳定性(运动/使用楼梯)和舒适度。

结果

单视在单眼 HCVA、LCVA 和 CS(6 m)、视力清晰度(远距离)、鬼影(P≤0.040)和双眼 HCVA 的 EDOFL 方面明显优于两种 EDOF CL(P≤0.047)。与 SV CL 相比,两种 EDOF CL 在-3 和-5 D 屈光度下 M 更接近理想的客观静态屈光度(P≤0.004)。在其他变量方面,CL 之间没有差异(P≥0.169)。

结论

与 SV CL 相比,近视儿童佩戴 EDOF CL 对调节和双眼系统的干扰最小。未来针对儿童的 EDOF 设计应减少 SV 对远距离视力和视力质量的差异,同时保持对中距离和近距离的相同性能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验