Nutrition Program, Department of Individual, Family and Community Education, MSC05 3040, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131. E-mail:
Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Jan 3;16:E01. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180200.
Differences in dietary intake and physical activity may explain the higher prevalence of obesity among adolescents living in rural versus urban settings. The objective of this cross-sectional secondary analysis was to compare baseline dietary intake and physical activity of adolescents by rurality.
We analyzed data on 940 adolescents who participated in ACTION PAC (Adolescents Committed to Improvement of Nutrition and Physical Activity), an obesity prevention and management intervention trial conducted from 2014 through 2017 in 8 public high schools in the southwestern United States. Dietary intake was assessed with the Block Food Screener, and participants completed an exercise log and wore an accelerometer to provide data on physical activity. We compared data by rural-urban commuting area (RUCA) codes and log population density by using multilevel models, with students nested within zip code and repeated measures for accelerometer analysis.
After adjusting for socioeconomic status and ethnicity, accelerometer data indicated that moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was 8.17 min/d (P = .02) higher and sedentary time was 20.42 min/d (P = .02) lower in moderately urban areas than in the urban reference area. Each 1-unit increase in log population density was associated with higher reported intake of whole grains (0.02 ounce equivalents, P = .03), potatoes (0.01 cup equivalents, P = .02), and added sugar (0.37 tsp, P = .02) after adjusting for socioeconomic status and ethnicity.
Differences in reported dietary intake and physical activity level by measures of rurality were small and inconsistent in direction to explain the disparities observed in rural versus urban areas.
饮食摄入和身体活动的差异可能解释了农村青少年比城市青少年肥胖率更高的原因。本横断面二次分析的目的是比较农村和城市青少年的基础饮食摄入和身体活动。
我们分析了 940 名参与 ACTIONPAC(青少年致力于改善营养和身体活动)的青少年的数据,该研究是一项肥胖预防和管理干预试验,于 2014 年至 2017 年在美国西南部的 8 所公立高中进行。饮食摄入通过 Block Food Screener 进行评估,参与者完成了一份运动日志并佩戴了加速度计,以提供身体活动数据。我们通过农村-城市通勤区(RUCA)代码比较数据,并使用多层模型比较按对数人口密度的比较,学生嵌套在邮政编码中,加速度计分析的重复测量。
调整社会经济地位和种族因素后,加速度计数据表明,中度城市地区的中度至剧烈体力活动每天多 8.17 分钟(P =.02),久坐时间每天少 20.42 分钟(P =.02)。对数人口密度每增加 1 个单位,与报告的全谷物摄入量增加 0.02 盎司当量(P =.03)、土豆摄入量增加 0.01 杯当量(P =.02)和添加糖摄入量增加 0.37 茶匙(P =.02)相关,调整社会经济地位和种族因素后。
以农村性度量为指标的报告饮食摄入和身体活动水平的差异很小,且方向不一致,无法解释农村地区与城市地区之间观察到的差异。