MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8311-y.
Living in urban or rural environments may influence children's levels of physical activity and sedentary behaviours. We know little about variations in device-measured physical activity and sedentary levels of urban and rural children using nationally representative samples, or if these differences are moderated by socioeconomic factors or seasonal variation. Moreover, little is known about the influence of 'walkability' in the UK context. A greater understanding of these can better inform intervention strategies or policy initiatives at the population level.
Country-wide cross-sectional study in Scotland in which 774 children (427 girls, 357 boys), aged 10/11 years, wore an accelerometer on one occasion for at least four weekdays and one weekend day. Mean total physical activity, time spent in sedentary, light, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), per day were extracted for weekdays, weekend days, and all days combined. Regression analyses explored associations between physical activity outcomes, urban/rural residence, and a modified walkability index (dwelling density and intersection density); with interactions fitted for household equivalised income and season of data collection. Sensitivity analyses assessed variation in findings by socioeconomic factors and urbanicity.
Rural children spent an average of 14 min less sedentary (95% CI of difference: 2.23, 26.32) and 13 min more in light intensity activity (95% CI of difference, 2.81, 24.09) per day than those from urban settlements. No urban-rural differences were found for time spent in MVPA or in total levels of activity. Our walkability index was not associated with any outcome measure. We found no interactions with household equivalised income, but there were urban/rural differences in seasonal variation; urban children engaged in higher levels of MVPA in the spring months (difference: 10 mins, p = 0.06, n.s) and significantly lower levels in winter (difference: 8.7 mins, p = 0.036).
Extrapolated across one-year, rural children would accumulate approximately 79 h (or just over 3 days) less sedentary time than urban children, replacing this for light intensity activity. With both outcomes having known implications for health, this finding is particularly important. Future work should prioritise exploring the patterns and context in which these differences occur to allow for more targeted intervention/policy strategies.
生活在城市或农村环境中可能会影响儿童的身体活动水平和久坐行为。我们对使用全国代表性样本的城市和农村儿童的设备测量身体活动和久坐水平的差异知之甚少,也不知道这些差异是否受到社会经济因素或季节性变化的调节。此外,在英国背景下,对“可步行性”的影响知之甚少。更好地了解这些因素可以更好地为人群层面的干预策略或政策举措提供信息。
在苏格兰进行了一项全国性的横断面研究,其中 774 名 10/11 岁的儿童(427 名女孩,357 名男孩)在至少四个工作日和一个周末日佩戴加速度计一次。工作日、周末日和所有日子的平均总身体活动量、久坐时间、低强度活动时间和中等到剧烈强度身体活动(MVPA)时间。回归分析探讨了身体活动结果、城乡居住和改良步行能力指数(居住密度和交叉口密度)之间的关联;为家庭等效收入和数据收集季节拟合了交互作用。敏感性分析评估了发现因社会经济因素和城市化程度的变化。
农村儿童每天平均久坐时间减少 14 分钟(差异的 95%置信区间:2.23,26.32),每天轻强度活动时间增加 13 分钟(差异的 95%置信区间:2.81,24.09)比城市住区的儿童。在 MVPA 或总活动水平方面,没有发现城乡差异。我们的步行能力指数与任何结果测量都没有关联。我们没有发现与家庭等效收入的相互作用,但在季节性变化方面存在城乡差异;城市儿童在春季的 MVPA 水平较高(差异:10 分钟,p=0.06,n.s),冬季较低(差异:8.7 分钟,p=0.036)。
推断一年,农村儿童的久坐时间将减少约 79 小时(或略多于 3 天),而以轻强度活动代替。由于这两个结果都对健康有明显的影响,因此这一发现尤为重要。未来的工作应优先探索这些差异发生的模式和背景,以便制定更有针对性的干预/政策策略。