• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

继发性和原发性氨苯砜耐药麻风病:对来自印度南部切图帕图圣托马斯医院和麻风病项目的199例患者的分析。

Secondary and primary dapsone resistant leprosy: an analysis of 199 patients from St. Thomas Hospital and leprosy project, Chettupattu, South India.

作者信息

Aschhoff M, Raj P P, Lilly L, Srinivasan H

机构信息

St. Thomas Hospital and Leprosy Centre, Chettupattu, Tamil Nadu.

出版信息

Indian J Lepr. 1988 Jan;60(1):34-46.

PMID:3060545
Abstract

The occurrence of secondary and primary dapsone resistance in 199 patients in our control area and the influence of certain variables such as age, initial bacteriological and morphological indices, duration of regular dapsone monotherapy, on the emergence of dapsone resistance was investigated. Ninety one of 122 patients and 29 out of 77 showed secondary (SDR) and primary (PDR) resistance to dapsone respectively. Very low BI (BI:2.5) group also showed both SDR (60%) and PDR (40%). Low or high MI group exhibited the same degree of resistance. Multiplication of M. leprae was obtained even when the MI of the inocula was zero. Even in the group who had 1 to 5 years duration of regular dapsone treatment, 85% patients showed SDR. Significance of such results are discussed in relation to chemotherapy. The overall minimum prevalence of SDR was found to be 5.6% and 21% in the case of PDR in our control area.

摘要

对我们控制区域内199例患者中继发性和原发性氨苯砜耐药的发生情况,以及年龄、初始细菌学和形态学指标、常规氨苯砜单药治疗持续时间等某些变量对氨苯砜耐药出现的影响进行了研究。122例患者中的91例和77例中的29例分别表现出对氨苯砜的继发性(SDR)和原发性(PDR)耐药。极低细菌指数(BI:2.5)组也同时表现出SDR(60%)和PDR(40%)。低或高形态指数(MI)组表现出相同程度的耐药性。即使接种物的MI为零,也能观察到麻风杆菌的增殖。即使在接受常规氨苯砜治疗1至5年的组中,85%的患者表现出SDR。结合化疗对这些结果的意义进行了讨论。在我们的控制区域,SDR的总体最低患病率为5.6%,PDR为21%。

相似文献

1
Secondary and primary dapsone resistant leprosy: an analysis of 199 patients from St. Thomas Hospital and leprosy project, Chettupattu, South India.继发性和原发性氨苯砜耐药麻风病:对来自印度南部切图帕图圣托马斯医院和麻风病项目的199例患者的分析。
Indian J Lepr. 1988 Jan;60(1):34-46.
2
Drug resistant-Mycobacterium leprae--results of mouse footpad studies from a laboratory in south India.耐药性麻风杆菌——印度南部某实验室小鼠足垫研究结果
Indian J Lepr. 2002 Oct-Dec;74(4):301-12.
3
Dapsone resistance in patients attending Central Leprosy Teaching and Research Institute, Chengalpattu (South India).位于金奈帕图(印度南部)的中央麻风病教学与研究所就诊患者中的氨苯砜耐药情况。
Indian J Lepr. 1984 Jul-Sep;56(3):587-94.
4
Prevalence survey of secondary dapsone resistance in leprosy in Kancheepuram and Tiruvannamalai control units of Tamil Nadu.泰米尔纳德邦坎契普尔姆和蒂鲁瓦纳马莱防治单位麻风病中氨苯砜继发性耐药的患病率调查
Lepr India. 1983 Apr;55(2):222-30.
5
Infectivity of secondary dapsone-resistant cases.继发氨苯砜耐药病例的传染性。
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1988 Sep;56(3):418-21.
6
Primary dapsone resistance as assessed by uptake of labelled thymidine by the macrophage resident Mycobacterium leprae.
Indian J Lepr. 1989 Oct;61(4):437-41.
7
Primary and secondary dapsone resistance of M. leprae in Martinique, Guadeloupe, New Caledonia, Tahiti, Senegal, and Paris between 1980 and 1985.1980年至1985年间马提尼克岛、瓜德罗普岛、新喀里多尼亚、塔希提岛、塞内加尔及巴黎麻风分枝杆菌对氨苯砜的原发性和继发性耐药情况。
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1987 Dec;55(4):672-9.
8
Viability of Mycobacterium leprae in lepromatous patients after five years of dapsone monotherapy supplemented with two years of multidrug therapy.在接受单药氨苯砜治疗五年并辅以两年多药治疗后,瘤型麻风患者体内麻风分枝杆菌的活力。
Indian J Lepr. 1995 Oct-Dec;67(4):427-33.
9
Susceptibility of strains of Mycobacterium leprae isolated prior to 1977 from patients with previously untreated lepromatous leprosy.1977年以前从未经治疗的瘤型麻风患者中分离出的麻风分枝杆菌菌株的药敏性。
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1986 Mar;54(1):11-5.
10
[Resistance of Mycobacterium leprae to dapsone and rifampicin: apropos of a survey carried out in the Cape Verde region (Senegal)].[麻风分枝杆菌对氨苯砜和利福平的耐药性:关于在佛得角地区(塞内加尔)开展的一项调查]
Med Trop (Mars). 1987 Apr-Jun;47(2):171-5.