Department of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):419-427. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003596.
Implementation of delirium guidelines at ICUs is suboptimal. The aim was to evaluate the impact of a tailored multifaceted implementation program of ICU delirium guidelines on processes of care and clinical outcomes and draw lessons regarding guideline implementation.
A prospective multicenter, pre-post, intervention study.
ICUs in one university hospital and five community hospitals.
Consecutive medical and surgical critically ill patients were enrolled between April 1, 2012, and February 1, 2015.
Multifaceted, three-phase (baseline, delirium screening, and guideline) implementation program of delirium guidelines in adult ICUs.
The primary outcome was adherence changes to delirium guidelines recommendations, based on the Pain, Agitation and Delirium guidelines. Secondary outcomes were brain dysfunction (delirium or coma), length of ICU stay, and hospital mortality. A total of 3,930 patients were included. Improvements after the implementation pertained to delirium screening (from 35% to 96%; p < 0.001), use of benzodiazepines for continuous sedation (from 36% to 17%; p < 0.001), light sedation of ventilated patients (from 55% to 61%; p < 0.001), physiotherapy (from 21% to 48%; p < 0.001), and early mobilization (from 10% to 19%; p < 0.001). Brain dysfunction improved: the mean delirium duration decreased from 5.6 to 3.3 days (-2.2 d; 95% CI, -3.2 to -1.3; p < 0.001), and coma days decreased from 14% to 9% (risk ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.6; p < 0.001). Other clinical outcome measures, such as length of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and hospital mortality, did not change.
This large pre-post implementation study of delirium-oriented measures based on the 2013 Pain, Agitation, and Delirium guidelines showed improved health professionals' adherence to delirium guidelines and reduced brain dysfunction. Our findings provide empirical support for the differential efficacy of the guideline bundle elements in a real-life setting and provide lessons for optimization of guideline implementation programs.
在 ICU 实施谵妄指南的效果并不理想。本研究旨在评估针对 ICU 谵妄指南的定制多方面实施计划对护理流程和临床结局的影响,并总结指南实施经验。
前瞻性、多中心、前后对照、干预研究。
一所大学附属医院和五所社区医院的 ICU。
2012 年 4 月 1 日至 2015 年 2 月 1 日期间连续入组的成年危重症患者,包括内科和外科患者。
对成人 ICU 中的谵妄指南进行多方面、三阶段(基线、谵妄筛查和指南)实施计划。
主要结局是根据疼痛、躁动和谵妄指南评估对谵妄指南建议的依从性变化。次要结局为脑功能障碍(谵妄或昏迷)、ICU 住院时间和医院死亡率。共纳入 3930 例患者。实施后改善的措施包括:谵妄筛查(从 35%升至 96%;p < 0.001)、用于持续镇静的苯二氮䓬类药物(从 36%降至 17%;p < 0.001)、机械通气患者的浅镇静(从 55%升至 61%;p < 0.001)、物理治疗(从 21%升至 48%;p < 0.001)和早期活动(从 10%升至 19%;p < 0.001)。脑功能障碍得到改善:谵妄持续时间从 5.6 天缩短至 3.3 天(-2.2 d;95%CI,-3.2 至-1.3;p < 0.001),昏迷天数从 14%降至 9%(风险比,0.5;95%CI,0.4-0.6;p < 0.001)。其他临床结局指标,如机械通气时间、ICU 住院时间和医院死亡率,均未改变。
本项基于 2013 年疼痛、躁动和谵妄指南的以谵妄为导向的措施的大型前后对照实施研究显示,医护人员对谵妄指南的依从性提高,脑功能障碍减少。我们的研究结果为真实环境中指南方案各组成部分的差异化疗效提供了经验支持,并为优化指南实施方案提供了经验。