Suppr超能文献

肝囊性包虫病1型与单纯性肝囊肿的鉴别:一项回顾性分析。

Differentiation between hepatic cystic echinococcosis types 1 and simple hepatic cysts: A retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Ran Bo, Aji Tuerganaili, Jiang Tieming, Zhang Ruiqing, Guo Qiang, Abulizi Abuduaini, Yimiti Yusfu, Wen Hao, Shao Yingmei

机构信息

Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Echinococcosis, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(1):e13731. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013731.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the clinic value of ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and serological testing in the differentiation between hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis (CE) types 1 and simple hepatic cysts.Totally 50 patients with CE Types 1 and 50 patients with simple hepatic cysts were included. All patients examined by ultrasound, CT and serological testing respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of diagnosis methods was drawn and their sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were compared. Pathology result was used as golden standard.The area under ROC curve of ultrasound was 0.97 and of CT and serological testing was 0.79 and 0.71 respectively. The sensitivity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of CE Types 1 was 96.00%, specificity was 98.00%, the positive likelihood ratio was 48.00, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.04. Disease prevalence was 50%, positive predictive value was 97.96%, and negative predictive value was 96.08%. The sensitivity of CT was 80.00%, specificity was 62.00%, positive likelihood ratio was 2.11, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.32. Disease prevalence was 50%, positive predictive value was 67.80%, and negative predictive value was 75.61%. The sensitivity of immunological test was 86.00%, specificity was 72.00%, positive likelihood ratio was 3.07, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.19. Disease prevalence was 50%, positive predictive value was 75.44%, and negative predictive value was 83.72%. Combined ultrasound and immunological test, the sensitivity and the specificity was 82% and 100% respectively. Combined CT and immunological test, the sensitivity the specificity was 70% and 82% respectively.In the differentiate diagnosis of CE Types 1 and simple hepatic cyst, ultrasound is better than CT with high sensitivity and specificity, therefore recommended. Immunological examination is an important complement to the imaging examination.

摘要

本研究旨在评估超声、计算机断层扫描(CT)及血清学检测在鉴别肝囊型包虫病1型与单纯性肝囊肿中的临床价值。共纳入50例肝囊型包虫病1型患者和50例单纯性肝囊肿患者。所有患者分别接受超声、CT及血清学检测。绘制诊断方法的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并比较其灵敏度、特异度、约登指数、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。病理结果作为金标准。超声的ROC曲线下面积为0.97,CT和血清学检测的分别为0.79和0.71。超声诊断肝囊型包虫病1型的灵敏度为96.00%,特异度为98.00%,阳性似然比为48.00,阴性似然比为0.04。疾病患病率为50%,阳性预测值为97.96%,阴性预测值为96.08%。CT的灵敏度为80.00%,特异度为62.00%,阳性似然比为2.11,阴性似然比为0.32。疾病患病率为50%,阳性预测值为67.80%,阴性预测值为75.61%。免疫学检测的灵敏度为86.00%,特异度为72.00%,阳性似然比为3.07,阴性似然比为0.19。疾病患病率为50%,阳性预测值为75.44%,阴性预测值为83.72%。超声与免疫学检测联合,灵敏度和特异度分别为82%和100%。CT与免疫学检测联合,灵敏度和特异度分别为70%和82%。在肝囊型包虫病1型与单纯性肝囊肿的鉴别诊断中,超声具有较高的灵敏度和特异度,优于CT,因此推荐使用。免疫学检查是影像学检查的重要补充。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a6f/6344192/ed9c7854b219/medi-98-e13731-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验