• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体差异的神经影像学:潜在变量建模视角。

Neuroimaging of individual differences: A latent variable modeling perspective.

机构信息

Washington University in St. Louis, Psychological and Brain Sciences, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.

Washington University in St. Louis, Psychological and Brain Sciences, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Mar;98:29-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.022. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.022
PMID:30611798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6980382/
Abstract

Neuroimaging data is being increasingly utilized to address questions of individual difference. When examined with task-related fMRI (t-fMRI), individual differences are typically investigated via correlations between the BOLD activation signal at every voxel and a particular behavioral measure. This can be problematic because: 1) correlational designs require evaluation of t-fMRI psychometric properties, yet these are not well understood; and 2) bivariate correlations are severely limited in modeling the complexities of brain-behavior relationships. Analytic tools from psychometric theory such as latent variable modeling (e.g., structural equation modeling) can help simultaneously address both concerns. This review explores the advantages gained from integrating psychometric theory and methods with cognitive neuroscience for the assessment and interpretation of individual differences. The first section provides background on classic and modern psychometric theories and analytics. The second section details current approaches to t-fMRI individual difference analyses and their psychometric limitations. The last section uses data from the Human Connectome Project to provide illustrative examples of how t-fMRI individual differences research can benefit by utilizing latent variable models.

摘要

神经影像学数据正越来越多地被用于解决个体差异问题。当使用任务相关功能磁共振成像(t-fMRI)进行检查时,个体差异通常通过在每个体素的 BOLD 激活信号与特定行为测量之间进行相关性来研究。这可能会产生问题,因为:1)相关设计需要评估 t-fMRI 的心理计量特性,但这些特性尚未得到很好的理解;2)双变量相关性在模拟大脑-行为关系的复杂性方面受到严重限制。心理计量理论中的分析工具,如潜在变量建模(例如,结构方程建模)可以帮助同时解决这两个问题。本综述探讨了将心理计量理论和方法与认知神经科学相结合,用于评估和解释个体差异的优势。第一节提供了经典和现代心理计量理论和分析的背景。第二节详细介绍了当前 t-fMRI 个体差异分析方法及其心理计量学局限性。最后一节使用人类连接组计划的数据,提供了说明性示例,说明如何通过使用潜在变量模型使 t-fMRI 个体差异研究受益。

相似文献

1
Neuroimaging of individual differences: A latent variable modeling perspective.个体差异的神经影像学:潜在变量建模视角。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Mar;98:29-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.022. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
2
Idiosynchrony: From shared responses to individual differences during naturalistic neuroimaging.非同步现象:自然神经影像学中的从共享反应到个体差异。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jul 15;215:116828. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116828. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
3
Ten simple rules for predictive modeling of individual differences in neuroimaging.神经影像学个体差异预测建模的 10 个简单规则。
Neuroimage. 2019 Jun;193:35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.057. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
4
Predicting individual traits from unperformed tasks.从未执行的任务中预测个体特征。
Neuroimage. 2022 Apr 1;249:118920. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118920. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
5
A Connectivity-Based Psychometric Prediction Framework for Brain-Behavior Relationship Studies.基于连通性的脑-行为关系研究心理计量预测框架。
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jul 5;31(8):3732-3751. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab044.
6
What Is the Test-Retest Reliability of Common Task-Functional MRI Measures? New Empirical Evidence and a Meta-Analysis.常见任务态功能磁共振测量的重测信度如何?新的实证证据和荟萃分析。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;31(7):792-806. doi: 10.1177/0956797620916786. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
7
Reliability of variability and complexity measures for task and task-free BOLD fMRI.任务态和静息态 fMRI 的变异性和复杂性测量的可靠性。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Jul 15;45(10):e26778. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26778.
8
The role of neural load effects in predicting individual differences in working memory function.神经负荷效应在预测工作记忆功能个体差异中的作用。
Neuroimage. 2021 Dec 15;245:118656. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118656. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
9
A comprehensive assessment of regional variation in the impact of head micromovements on functional connectomics.对头微运动对功能连接组学影响的区域变异进行全面评估。
Neuroimage. 2013 Aug 1;76:183-201. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
10
Nonlinear latent representations of high-dimensional task-fMRI data: Unveiling cognitive and behavioral insights in heterogeneous spatial maps.高维任务功能磁共振成像数据的非线性潜在表征:揭示异质空间图谱中的认知和行为见解。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 8;19(8):e0308329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308329. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Latent Growth Models of Longitudinal Changes in Functional Connectivity during Early Stage Psychosis.早期精神病性功能连接纵向变化的潜在增长模型
Neuroinformatics. 2025 Aug 14;23(3):43. doi: 10.1007/s12021-025-09742-5.
2
Reliability of structural brain change in cognitively healthy adult samples.认知健康成年样本中脑结构变化的可靠性。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Apr 22;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00547. eCollection 2025.
3
Pulse Pressure Impairs Cognition via White Matter Disruption.脉压通过白质破坏损害认知。

本文引用的文献

1
Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studies.小样本量降低了基于任务的功能磁共振成像研究的可重复性。
Commun Biol. 2018 Jun 7;1:62. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0073-z. eCollection 2018.
2
Model Implied Instrumental Variables (MIIVs): An Alternative Orientation to Structural Equation Modeling.模型隐含工具变量(MIIVs):对结构方程建模的另一种取向。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2019 Jan-Feb;54(1):31-46. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1483224. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
3
Statistical Challenges in "Big Data" Human Neuroimaging.“大数据”人类神经影像学中的统计挑战。
Hypertension. 2025 Sep;82(9):1480-1491. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.24543. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
4
Neural Topologies of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory: A Latent Variable Approach to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.强化敏感性理论的神经拓扑结构:一种用于磁共振成像数据的潜在变量方法。
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2025 May 7;5(5):100526. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100526. eCollection 2025 Sep.
5
Social pain is associated with altered developmental trajectories of connectivity among the triple network model of psychopathology.社会疼痛与精神病理学三重网络模型中连接性的发育轨迹改变有关。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 May 20;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf037.
6
Engagement of neural systems varies with level of executive function during late childhood: Evidence from a structural equation modeling approach to data from the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study.儿童晚期神经系统的参与程度随执行功能水平而变化:来自青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究数据的结构方程建模方法的证据。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Mar 15;73:101549. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101549.
7
Trait state occasion (TSO) modeling of event-related potentials (ERPs).事件相关电位(ERP)的特质状态情境(TSO)建模。
Biol Psychol. 2025 Mar;196:109000. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.109000. Epub 2025 Mar 8.
8
Measuring and interpreting individual differences in fetal, infant, and toddler neurodevelopment.测量和解读胎儿、婴儿及幼儿神经发育的个体差异。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Mar 1;73:101539. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101539.
9
Reliability of structural brain change in cognitively healthy adult samples.认知健康成年样本中脑结构变化的可靠性。
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 20:2024.06.03.592804. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.03.592804.
10
Enhancing task fMRI individual difference research with neural signatures.利用神经特征增强任务功能磁共振成像个体差异研究。
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 31:2025.01.30.25321355. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.30.25321355.
Neuron. 2018 Jan 17;97(2):263-268. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.018.
4
Combining region- and network-level brain-behavior relationships in a structural equation model.在结构方程模型中结合区域和网络水平的大脑-行为关系。
Neuroimage. 2018 Jan 15;165:158-169. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
5
The Role of Psychometrics in Individual Differences Research in Cognition: A Case Study of the AX-CPT.心理测量学在认知领域个体差异研究中的作用:以AX - CPT为例
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 4;8:1482. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01482. eCollection 2017.
6
Multimodal neural correlates of cognitive control in the Human Connectome Project.多模态神经关联的认知控制在人类连接组计划。
Neuroimage. 2017 Dec;163:41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.081. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
7
Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning.在心理学中选择预测而不是解释:来自机器学习的教训。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1100-1122. doi: 10.1177/1745691617693393. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
8
Fixing the stimulus-as-fixed-effect fallacy in task fMRI.纠正任务功能磁共振成像中刺激作为固定效应的谬误。
Wellcome Open Res. 2016 Dec 9;1:23. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.10298.2.
9
Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature.对近期认知神经科学和心理学文献中已发表的效应量和检验效能的实证评估。
PLoS Biol. 2017 Mar 2;15(3):e2000797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000797. eCollection 2017 Mar.
10
Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research.审视前沿:迈向透明且可重复的神经影像学研究。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Feb;18(2):115-126. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.167. Epub 2017 Jan 5.