• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防悖论的历史视角:当总体人群发生变化时。

Historical perspectives on prevention paradox: When the population moves as a whole.

作者信息

Raza Syed Ahsan, Salemi Jason Lee, Zoorob Roger Jamil

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2018 Nov-Dec;7(6):1163-1165. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_275_18.

DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_275_18
PMID:30613490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6293948/
Abstract

Rose's is critical reading for students and teachers in public health as well as practitioners of family and preventive medicine. In his classic, Geoffrey Rose outlines the prevention paradox that led to a discussion of two main preventive approaches to a disease, the individual- and population-based. This commentary briefly provides historical perspectives and viewpoints on the message of fundamental importance that when the population moves as a whole, the relative differences are the characteristics not of individuals but of populations. The "population as a whole" has been adopted in the lexicon of public health, enriched by Hippocrates' treatise on air, water, and places; Durkheim's collective consciousness; Pickering's continuous unimodal distribution; and Keys' charts of contrasting distributions. These readings should provide the public health professionals with a critical understanding of prevention paradox when they tend to focus only on the expression of the root cause above ground but fail to at the roots beneath the ground.

摘要

罗斯的著作对于公共卫生专业的学生和教师以及家庭医学和预防医学从业者来说都是批判性阅读材料。在他的经典著作中,杰弗里·罗斯概述了预防悖论,引发了对一种疾病的两种主要预防方法的讨论,即基于个体和基于人群的方法。这篇评论简要提供了关于一个至关重要信息的历史视角和观点,即当整个人口群体发生变化时,相对差异是人群而非个体的特征。“整个人口群体”已被纳入公共卫生词汇中,希波克拉底关于空气、水和地方的论述、涂尔干的集体意识、皮克林的连续单峰分布以及凯斯的对比分布图表丰富了这一概念。这些读物应能让公共卫生专业人员在倾向于只关注地面上根本原因的表现而未能深入探究地面下的根源时,对预防悖论有批判性的理解。

相似文献

1
Historical perspectives on prevention paradox: When the population moves as a whole.预防悖论的历史视角:当总体人群发生变化时。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2018 Nov-Dec;7(6):1163-1165. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_275_18.
2
The idea of uniform change: is it time to revisit a central tenet of Rose's "Strategy of Preventive Medicine"?统一变化的理念:是时候重新审视罗斯“预防医学策略”的核心原则了吗?
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Dec;104(6):1497-1507. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.127357. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
3
Rose's population strategy of prevention need not increase social inequalities in health.罗斯的预防人群策略不一定会增加健康方面的社会不平等。
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;39(2):372-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp315. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
4
Why the prevention paradox is a paradox, and why we should solve it: a philosophical view.为什么预防悖论是一个悖论,以及我们为什么应该解决它:一种哲学观点。
Prev Med. 2011 Oct;53(4-5):250-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
5
Population-based prevention of eating disorders: an application of the Rose prevention model.基于人群的饮食失调预防:罗斯预防模型的应用。
Prev Med. 2001 Mar;32(3):268-83. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0797.
6
Geoffrey Rose's Strategy of Prevention Applied to COVID-19.杰弗里·罗斯的预防策略应用于新冠疫情。
Health Secur. 2020 Dec;18(6):502-504. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0037. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
7
Sick individuals and sick populations: 20 years later.患病个体与患病群体:20年后
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 May;60(5):396-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.042770.
8
The Prevention Paradox Mark II: an appeal for diversity in public health.预防悖论 Mark II:呼吁公共卫生领域的多样性。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2017 Dec 1;39(4):e142-e144. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw133.
9
A critique of Geoffrey Rose's 'population strategy' for preventive medicine.对杰弗里·罗斯预防医学“人群策略”的批判。
J R Soc Med. 1995 Nov;88(11):607-10. doi: 10.1177/014107689508801102.
10
From primary care to the revolving door of hospital readmission: Relevance of Geoffrey Rose's call for a population strategy.从初级保健到医院再入院的循环:杰弗里·罗斯呼吁实施人口战略的意义。
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Mar 15;14:100848. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100848. eCollection 2019 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of an app to prevent negative outcomes of cyberbullying: A cluster randomized controlled trial.一款预防网络欺凌负面后果的应用程序的效果:一项整群随机对照试验。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Apr 22;4(4):e0000819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000819. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Spillover effects from a type 2 diabetes integrated model of care in 22,706 Australians: an open cohort stepped wedge trial.22706 名澳大利亚人 2 型糖尿病综合护理模式的溢出效应:一项开放队列分步楔形试验。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2024 Sep 10;24(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12902-024-01692-4.
3
Unveiling the Significance and Challenges of Integrating Prevention Levels in Healthcare Practice.揭示在医疗保健实践中整合预防层次的意义和挑战。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231186500. doi: 10.1177/21501319231186500.
4
The COVID-19 pandemic and temporal change in metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease: A natural experiment within the HELIUS study.新冠疫情与心血管疾病代谢危险因素的时间变化:HELIUS研究中的一项自然实验
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Sep;23:101432. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101432. Epub 2023 May 19.
5
The Paradox of Suicide Prevention.自杀预防的悖论。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 15;19(22):14983. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214983.
6
Using Digital Technology to Reduce the Prevalence of Mental Health Disorders in Populations: Time for a New Approach.利用数字技术降低人群中心理健康障碍的流行率:是时候采取新方法了。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 24;22(7):e17493. doi: 10.2196/17493.
7
Correlates and inequality of underweight and overweight among women of reproductive age: Evidence from the 2016 Nepal Demographic Health Survey.育龄妇女体重过轻和超重的相关因素及不平等:来自 2016 年尼泊尔人口健康调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 May 10;14(5):e0216644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216644. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
High Blood Pressure.高血压
Br Med J. 1939 Jan 7;1(4070):1-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.4070.1.
2
Transcending the known in public health practice: the inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations.超越公共卫生实践中的已知:不平等悖论:人群方法与弱势群体
Am J Public Health. 2008 Feb;98(2):216-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114777. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
3
Commentary: causes of incidence and causes of cases--a Durkheimian perspective on Rose.评论:发病率原因与病例原因——涂尔干视角下的罗斯观点
Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Jun;30(3):435-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.3.435.
4
A critique of Geoffrey Rose's 'population strategy' for preventive medicine.对杰弗里·罗斯预防医学“人群策略”的批判。
J R Soc Med. 1995 Nov;88(11):607-10. doi: 10.1177/014107689508801102.
5
The population paradox.人口悖论
J R Soc Med. 1995 Nov;88(11):605-6.
6
Epidemiological studies related to coronary heart disease: characteristics of men aged 40-59 in seven countries.与冠心病相关的流行病学研究:七个国家中40至59岁男性的特征
Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1966;460:1-392.
7
Sick individuals and sick populations.患病个体与患病群体。
Int J Epidemiol. 1985 Mar;14(1):32-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/14.1.32.
8
Intersalt: an international study of electrolyte excretion and blood pressure. Results for 24 hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion. Intersalt Cooperative Research Group.国际食盐与血压关系研究(INTERSALT):电解质排泄与血压的国际研究。24小时尿钠和钾排泄结果。INTERSALT合作研究组
BMJ. 1988 Jul 30;297(6644):319-28. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6644.319.