a Basic Biobehavioral and Psychological Sciences Branch , Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute , Rockville , MD , USA.
b Department of Psychiatry and Weill Institute for Neurosciences , University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , CA , USA.
Psychol Health. 2019 Mar;34(3):336-354. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1529313. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
Habitual use of emotion regulation strategies may influence physical health. We examined whether the tendencies to employ cognitive reappraisal and suppression were associated with health biomarkers, and whether stress and sleep quality mediated these associations. Design & main outcome measures: Using data from the Biomarkers substudy (n = 1255) of the national Midlife in the U.S. Study, we tested the hypothesis that there would be indirect, but not direct, associations of cognitive reappraisal and suppression to biomarker indicators of multisystem physiological dysregulation, that is, allostatic load (AL). We computed the proportion of biomarkers in the highest risk quartile within seven biological systems, and summed these scores to compute AL. Associations with the biological systems were also examined separately.
Neither reappraisal nor suppression was directly associated with AL or biomarker function in the seven biological systems. Suppression was indirectly associated with higher AL and greater dysregulation in the inflammatory, metabolic, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal systems via its relations to stress and sleep, p < 0.05. Reappraisal was indirectly associated with lower AL and less metabolic and inflammatory dysregulation, ps<0.05.
Suppression and reappraisal may have different downstream health effects via stress, sleep, and biomarker expression, suggesting malleable emotion regulation strategies may be an important intervention target.
习惯性地使用情绪调节策略可能会影响身体健康。我们研究了认知重评和抑制的倾向是否与健康生物标志物相关,以及压力和睡眠质量是否在这些关联中起中介作用。
利用来自美国中年生物标志物子研究(n=1255)的数据,我们检验了这样一个假设,即认知重评和抑制与多系统生理失调的生物标志物指标(即,全身适应综合征)之间存在间接而非直接的关联。我们计算了七个生物系统中处于最高风险四分位数的生物标志物比例,并将这些分数相加来计算全身适应综合征。还分别检查了与生物系统的关联。
重评和抑制都与 AL 或七个生物系统中的生物标志物功能没有直接关联。抑制通过与压力和睡眠的关系,与炎症、代谢和下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺系统中的更高 AL 和更大的失调呈间接相关,p<0.05。重评与较低的 AL 和较少的代谢和炎症失调呈间接相关,ps<0.05。
抑制和重评可能通过压力、睡眠和生物标志物表达产生不同的下游健康影响,这表明可塑的情绪调节策略可能是一个重要的干预目标。