Columbia University Medical Center.
Pennsylvania State University.
Health Psychol. 2018 Mar;37(3):301-305. doi: 10.1037/hea0000564. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Experimental studies have shown that 2 emotion regulation strategies-suppression and reappraisal-are associated with differential profiles of physiological activation in response to a stress test. The present study aims to add to those findings by investigating whether individual differences in trait emotion regulation strategies are associated with diurnal cortisol patterns in a naturalistic context.
A sample of 46 men and women from the Midlife in the United States II (MIDUS II) study completed the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) and provided 4 salivary cortisol samples per day over 4 consecutive days. Trait reappraisal and suppression were tested as predictors of 3 cortisol parameters averaged across days: cortisol awakening response (CAR), diurnal cortisol slope (DCS), and area under the curve with respect to ground (AUCg).
Higher scores on the suppression scale were associated with more physiological activation, as indicated by steeper CAR and flatter DCS. Suppression was not associated with AUCg, and reappraisal was not predictive of any cortisol parameter.
Individual differences in suppression, but not reappraisal, were linked to greater cortisol activation in this naturalistic study. These preliminary results add to a growing body of findings that link suppression to adverse psychological and physiological profiles. (PsycINFO Database Record
实验研究表明,两种情绪调节策略——抑制和重评——与应激测试中生理激活的不同特征有关。本研究旨在通过调查个体特质情绪调节策略的差异是否与自然环境中的日间皮质醇模式有关,进一步证实这些发现。
来自美国中期生活研究 II(MIDUS II)的 46 名男性和女性完成了情绪调节问卷(ERQ),并在连续 4 天内每天提供 4 份唾液皮质醇样本。特质重评和抑制被测试为 3 个皮质醇参数的预测因子:皮质醇觉醒反应(CAR)、日间皮质醇斜率(DCS)和基于地面的曲线下面积(AUCg)。
抑制量表的得分越高,表明 CAR 越陡峭,DCS 越平坦,生理激活越大。抑制与 AUCg 无关,重评与任何皮质醇参数均无相关性。
在这项自然主义研究中,抑制而非重评的个体差异与更大的皮质醇激活有关。这些初步结果增加了越来越多的发现,即抑制与不良的心理和生理特征有关。