• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

资金最雄厚的数字健康公司及其对高负担、高成本疾病的影响。

Top-Funded Digital Health Companies And Their Impact On High-Burden, High-Cost Conditions.

机构信息

Kyan Safavi is the David F. Torchiana Health Policy and Management Fellow at the Massachusetts General Physicians Organization and an instructor at Harvard Medical School in the Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, in Boston.

Simon C. Mathews is an assistant professor of medicine in the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, and head of clinical innovation, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, both in Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jan;38(1):115-123. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05081.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05081
PMID:30615535
Abstract

Digital health companies hold promise to address major health care challenges, though little has been published on their impact. We identified the twenty top-funded private US-based digital health companies to analyze their products and services, related peer-reviewed evidence, and the potential for impact on patients with high-burden conditions. Data analytics (including artificial intelligence and big data) was the most common company type. Companies producing biosensors had the greatest funding. Publications were concentrated among a small number of companies. Healthy volunteers were most commonly studied. Few studies enrolled high-burden populations, and few measured their impact in terms of outcomes, cost, or access to care. These data suggest that leading digital health companies have not yet demonstrated substantial impact on disease burden or cost in the US health care system. Our findings indicate the importance of fostering an environment, with regard to policy and the consumer market, that encourages the development of evidence-based, high-impact products.

摘要

数字健康公司有望解决主要的医疗保健挑战,但关于它们的影响却鲜有报道。我们确定了 20 家资金最雄厚的美国本土数字健康公司,以分析它们的产品和服务、相关同行评议证据,以及对高负担疾病患者产生影响的潜力。数据分析(包括人工智能和大数据)是最常见的公司类型。生产生物传感器的公司获得的资金最多。出版物集中在少数几家公司中。健康志愿者是最常被研究的对象。很少有研究纳入高负担人群,也很少有研究从结果、成本或获得医疗保健的角度衡量其影响。这些数据表明,领先的数字健康公司尚未证明它们在美国医疗保健系统中对疾病负担或成本产生了重大影响。我们的研究结果表明,重要的是要营造一种政策和消费者市场环境,鼓励开发基于证据、具有高影响力的产品。

相似文献

1
Top-Funded Digital Health Companies And Their Impact On High-Burden, High-Cost Conditions.资金最雄厚的数字健康公司及其对高负担、高成本疾病的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jan;38(1):115-123. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05081.
2
The promise of biomedical innovation.生物医学创新的前景。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Feb;34(2):198. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1491.
3
4
Strategic Opportunities for Leveraging Low-cost, High-impact Technological Innovations to Promote Cardiovascular Health in India.利用低成本、高影响力的技术创新促进印度心血管健康的战略机遇。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Feb 21;29(Suppl 1):145-152. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S1.145. eCollection 2019.
5
How to compete with Google and Co.: big data and artificial intelligence in stones.如何与谷歌等公司竞争:石头中的大数据和人工智能。
Curr Opin Urol. 2019 Mar;29(2):135-142. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000578.
6
Market watch: a framework for biomedical innovation in emerging markets.市场观察:新兴市场生物医学创新框架
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014 Sep;13(9):646-7. doi: 10.1038/nrd4413.
7
Fostering healthcare innovation in public hospitals: the Queensland experience.促进公立医院的医疗创新:昆士兰的经验
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jan;43(6):672-675. doi: 10.1071/AH18055.
8
High Spending Growth Rates For Key Diseases In 2000-14 Were Driven By Technology And Demographic Factors.2000-14 年主要疾病的高支出增长率是由技术和人口因素驱动的。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jun;37(6):915-924. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1688.
9
High technology health care.高科技医疗保健。
Natl Forum. 1989 Fall;69(4):14-7.
10
Accelerating Innovation in Ophthalmic Digital Health: New Frontiers for Medical Devices.加速眼科数字健康领域的创新:医疗设备的新前沿
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 1;135(12):1291-1292. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4376.

引用本文的文献

1
How is Engagement Defined Across Health Care Services and Technology Companies? A Systematic Review.医疗保健服务和科技公司如何定义参与度?一项系统综述。
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2025 Aug 6;3(3):100256. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100256. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Top-funded digital health companies offering lifestyle interventions for dementia prevention: Company overview and evidence analysis.获得大量资金的数字健康公司提供预防痴呆症的生活方式干预措施:公司概况与证据分析。
PLoS One. 2025 May 5;20(5):e0323390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323390. eCollection 2025.
3
Digital Mental Health Screening, Feedback, and Referral System for Teens With Socially Complex Needs: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Integrating the Teen Assess, Check, and Heal System into Pediatric Primary Care.
针对有复杂社交需求青少年的数字心理健康筛查、反馈与转诊系统:将青少年评估、检查与康复系统整合到儿科初级保健中的随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Feb 18;14:e65245. doi: 10.2196/65245.
4
Digital health technologies and innovation patterns in diabetes ecosystems.糖尿病生态系统中的数字健康技术与创新模式。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 5;11:20552076241311740. doi: 10.1177/20552076241311740. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
A personal sensing technology enabled service versus a digital psychoeducation control for primary care patients with depression and anxiety: a pilot randomized controlled trial.基于个人感知技术的服务与数字心理教育对照用于初级保健患者抑郁和焦虑的初步随机对照试验
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06284-z.
6
Top-funded companies offering digital health interventions for the prevention and treatment of depression: a systematic market analysis.为预防和治疗抑郁症提供数字健康干预措施的资金雄厚的公司:系统的市场分析。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Nov 4;82(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01424-z.
7
Implementation of a Technology-Enabled Diabetes Self-Management Peer Coaching Intervention for Patients With Poorly Controlled Diabetes: Quasi-Experimental Case Study.为糖尿病控制不佳患者实施基于技术的糖尿病自我管理同伴辅导干预:准实验性案例研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2024 Oct 15;9:e54370. doi: 10.2196/54370.
8
Patient Engagement with Conversational Agents in Health Applications 2016-2022: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.患者在健康应用中与对话式代理的互动 2016-2022:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
J Med Syst. 2024 Apr 10;48(1):40. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02059-x.
9
The Political Economy of Digital Health Equity: Structural Analysis.数字健康公平的政治经济学:结构分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 26;26:e46971. doi: 10.2196/46971.
10
Non-pharmaceutical interventions to optimize cancer immunotherapy.优化癌症免疫疗法的非药物干预措施。
Oncoimmunology. 2023 Sep 28;12(1):2255459. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2023.2255459. eCollection 2023.