• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性对使用非侵入性电子设备自我监测妊娠的态度:一项横断面多中心研究。

Women's Attitudes Toward Self-Monitoring of Their Pregnancy Using Noninvasive Electronic Devices: Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Women's Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Women's Clinic Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 7;7(1):e11458. doi: 10.2196/11458.

DOI:10.2196/11458
PMID:30617040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6329419/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy can be distressing, particularly if expectant mothers are worried about the well-being of their fetus. Consequently, the desire for reassurance and frequent fetal monitoring is often pronounced. Smart wearable devices and telemedicine are promising tools that could assist women in self-monitoring their pregnancy at home, hence disburdening emergency departments (EDs). They present the possibility to clarify the need for urgent care remotely and offer tighter pregnancy monitoring. However, patients' acceptance of such new technologies for fetal monitoring has not yet been explored extensively.

OBJECTIVE

This survey aimed to elucidate the attitudes of women toward self-monitoring of their pregnancy using noninvasive electronic devices. The technical details of the proposed devices were not specified.

METHODS

A cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted at the departments of obstetrics of the University Hospitals of Heidelberg and Leipzig, Germany. All patients seen in the obstetrics clinic who were above 18 years were offered participation. We designed a survey questionnaire including validated instruments covering population characteristics, issues in current and past pregnancies, as well as attitudes toward self-monitoring of pregnancy with smart devices.

RESULTS

A total of 509 pregnant women with no previous experience in telemedicine participated. Only a small minority of 5.9% (29/493) regarded self-monitoring with wearable devices as an alternative to consulting their physicians. Along these lines, only 7.7% (38/496) strongly believed they would visit the ED less often if such devices were readily available. However, if the procedure were combined with a Web-based telemetric physician consult, 13.5% (66/487) would be highly motivated to use the devices. Furthermore, significantly more women regarded it as an alternative prior to seeing a doctor when they perceived a decline in fetal movements (P<.001). Interestingly, women with university degrees had a higher propensity to engage in pregnancy self-monitoring compared with women without one (37% vs 23%; P=.001). Of the participants, 77.9% (381/489) would like smart wearable devices to measure fetal heart sounds, and 62.6% (306/489) wished to use the devices on their own. Feedback from a doctor or midwife was also very important in their choice of such devices (61.8%, 301/487 wished feedback). The intended frequency of use differed vastly among women, ranging from 13.8% (65/471) who would like to use such a device several times per day to 31.6% (149/471) who favored once per week at most.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results point to a skeptical attitude toward pregnancy self-monitoring among pregnant women. Nevertheless, many women are open to using devices for pregnancy monitoring in parallel to consulting their physician. The intention to use such devices several times daily or weekly, expressed by more than half of the participants, highlights the potential of such technologies.

摘要

背景

怀孕可能会让人感到不安,尤其是当孕妇担心胎儿的健康时。因此,她们通常会强烈渴望得到安慰和频繁的胎儿监测。智能可穿戴设备和远程医疗是很有前途的工具,可以帮助女性在家中进行自我妊娠监测,从而减轻急诊部门(ED)的负担。它们提供了远程明确紧急护理需求的可能性,并提供了更紧密的妊娠监测。然而,患者对这些用于胎儿监测的新技术的接受程度尚未得到广泛探索。

目的

本研究旨在阐明女性对使用非侵入性电子设备自我监测妊娠的态度。研究未具体说明拟议设备的技术细节。

方法

这是一项在德国海德堡和莱比锡大学附属医院妇产科进行的横断面多中心研究。向妇产科诊所中所有 18 岁以上的患者提供参与机会。我们设计了一份调查问卷调查,其中包括涵盖人口特征、当前和过去妊娠问题以及对使用智能设备自我监测妊娠的态度的经过验证的工具。

结果

共有 509 名没有远程医疗经验的孕妇参与了研究。只有极少数(5.9%(29/493))的人认为使用可穿戴设备进行自我监测是咨询医生的替代方法。同样,只有 7.7%(38/496)的人强烈认为如果这些设备易于获得,他们去急诊的次数会减少。然而,如果该程序与基于网络的远程医生咨询相结合,那么 13.5%(66/487)的人将非常有动力使用这些设备。此外,当女性感知到胎儿运动减少时,更多的女性认为这是在看医生之前的一种替代方法(P<.001)。有趣的是,与没有大学学历的女性相比,具有大学学历的女性更倾向于进行妊娠自我监测(37%比 23%;P=.001)。在参与者中,77.9%(381/489)希望智能可穿戴设备测量胎儿的心跳声,62.6%(306/489)希望自行使用该设备。医生或助产士的反馈在她们选择此类设备时也非常重要(61.8%,301/487 希望得到反馈)。女性使用此类设备的频率差异很大,范围从 13.8%(65/471)希望每天使用几次到 31.6%(149/471)最多每周使用一次。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,孕妇对妊娠自我监测持怀疑态度。然而,许多女性愿意在咨询医生的同时使用设备进行妊娠监测。超过一半的参与者表达了每天或每周多次使用此类设备的意图,这突出了这些技术的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0a/6329419/52af8c0085ee/mhealth_v7i1e11458_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0a/6329419/52af8c0085ee/mhealth_v7i1e11458_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba0a/6329419/52af8c0085ee/mhealth_v7i1e11458_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Women's Attitudes Toward Self-Monitoring of Their Pregnancy Using Noninvasive Electronic Devices: Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study.女性对使用非侵入性电子设备自我监测妊娠的态度:一项横断面多中心研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 7;7(1):e11458. doi: 10.2196/11458.
2
Acceptance of a new non-invasive fetal monitoring system and attitude for telemedicine approaches in obstetrics: a case-control study.一种新型无创胎儿监测系统的接受度及产科远程医疗方法的态度:一项病例对照研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Dec;298(6):1085-1093. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4918-y. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
3
A Web-Based Survey Assessing the Attitudes of Health Care Professionals in Germany Toward the Use of Telemedicine in Pregnancy Monitoring: Cross-Sectional Study.一项基于网络的调查,评估德国医疗保健专业人员对远程医疗用于孕期监测的态度:横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Aug 8;6(8):e10063. doi: 10.2196/10063.
4
Home-Based Monitoring and Telemonitoring of Complicated Pregnancies: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of Current Practice in the Netherlands.家庭为基础的监测和复杂妊娠的远程监护:荷兰全国范围内当前实践的横断面调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 28;8(10):e18966. doi: 10.2196/18966.
5
Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women's experiences.家庭为基础的远程监护与高危妊娠住院治疗:对女性体验的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2779-4.
6
Perceptions and Challenges of Telehealth Obstetric Clinics Among Pregnant Women in Hong Kong: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.香港孕妇对远程医疗产科诊所的看法和挑战:横断面问卷调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 19;25:e46663. doi: 10.2196/46663.
7
Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.面向医疗保险人群的远程医疗:儿科、产科及临床医生间接居家干预措施
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001 Aug(24 Suppl):1-32.
8
Randomized comparison of a reduced-visit prenatal care model enhanced with remote monitoring.随机比较强化远程监测的简化产前护理模式。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):638.e1-638.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.034. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
9
Wearable technology for health monitoring during pregnancy: an observational cross-sectional survey study.可穿戴技术在妊娠期健康监测中的应用:一项观察性横断面调查研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jul;308(1):73-78. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06705-y. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
10
Perceptions and Acceptance of mHealth in Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.移动医疗在心血管疾病患者中的认知和接受度:一项横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 4;7(2):e10117. doi: 10.2196/10117.

引用本文的文献

1
Virtual-Based Prenatal Care Methods and Their Reported Outcomes-A Scoping Review.基于虚拟技术的产前护理方法及其报告结果——一项范围综述
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 18;8(8):e71150. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71150. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Consumer insights from a feasibility study on remote and extended use of a novel non-invasive wearable fetal electrocardiogram monitor.一项关于新型无创可穿戴胎儿心电图监测仪远程及长期使用可行性研究的消费者洞察。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 21;8(1):216. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01628-9.
3
Views and opinions of patients with glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration on vision home-monitoring: a UK-based focus group study.

本文引用的文献

1
A Web-Based Survey Assessing the Attitudes of Health Care Professionals in Germany Toward the Use of Telemedicine in Pregnancy Monitoring: Cross-Sectional Study.一项基于网络的调查,评估德国医疗保健专业人员对远程医疗用于孕期监测的态度:横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Aug 8;6(8):e10063. doi: 10.2196/10063.
2
In-Person Health Care as Option B.将面对面医疗保健作为备选方案B。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):104-106. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1710735.
3
The Promise, Growth, and Reality of Mobile Health - Another Data-free Zone.移动健康的前景、发展与现实——另一个无数据区域
青光眼和年龄相关性黄斑变性患者对家庭视力监测的看法和意见:一项基于英国的焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 13;14(7):e080619. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080619.
4
Home monitoring of fetal heart rhythm: Lived experiences of women with anti-SSA/Ro52 autoantibodies and their co-parents.胎儿心率家庭监测:抗 SSA/Ro52 自身抗体阳性妇女及其共同父母的生活体验。
Lupus. 2024 Jun;33(7):685-692. doi: 10.1177/09612033241244465. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
5
Mitigating Health-Related Uncertainties During Pregnancy: The Role of Smart Health Monitoring Technologies.减轻孕期健康相关不确定性:智能健康监测技术的作用。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 25;26:e48493. doi: 10.2196/48493.
6
Usability and Perception of a Wearable-Integrated Digital Maternity Record App in Germany: User Study.德国一款可穿戴集成数字产妇记录应用程序的可用性与用户感知:用户研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 Dec 15;6:e50765. doi: 10.2196/50765.
7
Expectations related to home-based telemonitoring of high-risk pregnancies: A qualitative study addressing healthcare providers' and users' views in Norway.基于家庭的高危妊娠远程监护的预期:一项针对挪威医疗保健提供者和使用者观点的定性研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Feb;103(2):276-285. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14726. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
8
Feasibility and Acceptance of Self-Guided Mobile Ultrasound among Pregnant Women in Routine Prenatal Care.自我引导式移动超声在常规产前护理孕妇中的可行性与接受度
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 22;12(13):4224. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134224.
9
Virtual prenatal visits associated with high measures of patient experience and satisfaction among average-risk patients: a prospective cohort study.虚拟产前访视在一般风险孕妇中与较高的患者体验和满意度相关:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 6;23(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05421-y.
10
The use and role of telemedicine in maternal fetal medicine around the world: an up-to-date.远程医疗在全球围产医学中的应用与作用:最新进展
Health Technol (Berl). 2023;13(3):365-372. doi: 10.1007/s12553-023-00742-6. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 23;377(21):2010-2011. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1713180. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
4
Telehealth.远程医疗
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 19;377(16):1585-1592. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1503323.
5
A qualitative study of COPD-patients' experience of a telemedicine intervention.一项关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者远程医疗干预体验的定性研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Nov;107:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
6
Effectiveness of Telemonitoring in Obstetrics: Scoping Review.远程监测在产科中的有效性:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 27;19(9):e327. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7266.
7
Barriers and benefits to using mobile health technology after operation: A qualitative study.术后使用移动健康技术的障碍与益处:一项定性研究。
Surgery. 2017 Sep;162(3):605-611. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
8
Health App Possession Among Smartphone or Tablet Owners in Hong Kong: Population-Based Survey.香港智能手机或平板电脑用户的健康应用程序拥有情况:基于人群的调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Jun 5;5(6):e77. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7628.
9
Virtual Visits and Patient-Centered Care: Results of a Patient Survey and Observational Study.虚拟就诊与以患者为中心的医疗:一项患者调查及观察性研究的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 26;19(5):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7374.
10
Perceptions of Patient Engagement Applications During Pregnancy: A Qualitative Assessment of the Patient's Perspective.孕期患者参与应用程序的认知:基于患者视角的定性评估
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 May 26;5(5):e73. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7040.