• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绿色防控技术采纳行为的持续期分析。

Duration analysis on the adoption behavior of green control techniques.

机构信息

College of Economics, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, Shandong, China.

Research Center for Food Safety Co-governance of Shandong Province, Yantai Road 80#, Rizhao, 276826, Shandong Province, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Mar;26(7):6319-6327. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-04088-9. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-018-04088-9
PMID:30617899
Abstract

Based on field survey data of 366 traditional households (THs) and 364 family farms (FFs) from Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, a discrete-time cloglog model for parameter estimation was constructed to reveal factors that affect the two types of farms' duration from the awareness to the adoption of green control techniques (GCTs). Differences in the influencing factors affecting the duration of the two types of farmers were also discussed. The research results are as follows. First, the duration from awareness to adoption of GCTs is significantly shorter in FFs than that in THs. Second, a higher degree of education, risk preference, family financial status, perceived ease of use and usefulness of the technique, and extension of media and supervision of agricultural technique extension departments of local governments significantly reduce the duration from awareness to adoption of GCTs by THs and FFs, whereas a male head of household prolongs the duration. Third, the age, farm size, and number of laborers exert different impacts on the duration from awareness to adoption of GCTs by THs and FFs.

摘要

基于黄淮海平原 366 户传统农户(THs)和 364 户家庭农场(FFs)的实地调查数据,构建了一个离散时间 cloglog 模型进行参数估计,以揭示影响两类农场从绿色防控技术(GCTs)意识阶段到采用阶段持续时间的因素。还讨论了影响两类农民持续时间的因素差异。研究结果如下。首先,FFs 从意识到采用 GCTs 的持续时间明显短于 THs。其次,较高的教育程度、风险偏好、家庭经济状况、对技术易用性和有用性的感知,以及媒体的推广和地方政府农业技术推广部门的监督,显著缩短了 THs 和 FFs 从意识到采用 GCTs 的持续时间,而男性户主则延长了这一持续时间。第三,年龄、农场规模和劳动力数量对 THs 和 FFs 从意识到采用 GCTs 的持续时间产生不同的影响。

相似文献

1
Duration analysis on the adoption behavior of green control techniques.绿色防控技术采纳行为的持续期分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Mar;26(7):6319-6327. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-04088-9. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
2
Analysis of factors influencing family farms' adoption of green prevention and control techniques on an integrative framework of the TPB and NAM.基于 TPB 和 NAM 的整合框架分析影响家庭农场采用绿色防控技术的因素。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Jul;247:104314. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104314. Epub 2024 May 18.
3
Confucian values, trust, and family farm adoption of green control techniques.儒家价值观、信任与家庭农场对绿色防控技术的采用
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(28):35099-35111. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09724-x. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
4
Factors affecting the adoption of green prevention and control techniques by family farms: Evidence from Henan province of China.影响家庭农场采用绿色防控技术的因素:来自中国河南省的证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 22;13:1015802. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015802. eCollection 2022.
5
Adoption and income effects of new agricultural technology on family farms in China.中国新型农业技术对家庭农场的采纳和收入效应。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 26;17(4):e0267101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267101. eCollection 2022.
6
How Does Part-Time Farming Affect Farmers' Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Jianghan Plain, China?兼业经营如何影响江汉平原农户对保护性农业的采纳?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 18;17(16):5983. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165983.
7
Status and factors influencing on-farm conservation of Kam Sweet Rice (Oryza sativa L.) genetic resources in southeast Guizhou Province, China.中国贵州省东南部稻田甜水稻(Oryza sativa L.)遗传资源的保存现状及其影响因素。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018 Nov 29;14(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13002-018-0256-1.
8
Farmers' adoption behavior of conservation tillage technology: a multidimensional heterogeneity perspective.农民对保护性耕作技术的采用行为:多维异质性视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):37744-37761. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24716-9. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
9
Farmers' Willingness to Adopt Conservation Agriculture: New Evidence from Lebanon.农民采用保护性农业的意愿:来自黎巴嫩的新证据。
Environ Manage. 2017 Oct;60(4):693-704. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0904-6. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
10
Environmental impacts of modern agricultural technology diffusion in Bangladesh: an analysis of farmers' perceptions and their determinants.孟加拉国现代农业技术传播的环境影响:农民认知及其决定因素分析
J Environ Manage. 2003 Jun;68(2):183-91. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4797(03)00066-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Influencing Factors and Mechanism of Farmers' Green Production Behaviors in China.中国农民绿色生产行为的影响因素及作用机制分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 5;20(2):961. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20020961.
2
Factors affecting the adoption of green prevention and control techniques by family farms: Evidence from Henan province of China.影响家庭农场采用绿色防控技术的因素:来自中国河南省的证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 22;13:1015802. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015802. eCollection 2022.
3
Livelihoods, Technological Constraints, and Low-Carbon Agricultural Technology Preferences of Farmers: Analytical Frameworks of Technology Adoption and Farmer Livelihoods.

本文引用的文献

1
Farm-level economics of innovative tillage technologies: the case of no-till in the Altai Krai in Russian Siberia.创新耕作技术的农场经济:俄罗斯西伯利亚阿尔泰边疆区免耕的案例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jan;25(2):1016-1032. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9268-y. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
2
Pesticide Use and Risk Perceptions among Small-Scale Farmers in Anqiu County, China.中国安丘县小规模农户的农药使用与风险认知
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Dec 30;14(1):29. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010029.
3
Influential impacts of combined government policies for safe disposal of dead pigs on farmer behavior.
农民的生计、技术约束与低碳农业技术偏好:技术采纳与农民生计的分析框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 18;18(24):13364. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413364.
4
Identifying knowledge levels of aquaponics adopters.识别水培采用者的知识水平。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Feb;27(4):4536-4540. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06758-8. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
政府联合出台的病死猪无害化处理政策对养殖户行为的影响
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Feb;24(4):3997-4007. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-8154-3. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
4
Smallholder farmers' behavioural intentions towards sustainable agricultural practices.小农户对可持续农业实践的行为意图。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Feb 1;187:71-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
5
Control of vegetable pests in Benin - Farmers' preferences for eco-friendly nets as an alternative to insecticides.贝宁的蔬菜害虫防治 - 农民偏爱环保防虫网作为杀虫剂的替代品。
J Environ Manage. 2015 Jan 1;147:95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 28.