Heirene Robert, John Bev, Roderique-Davies Gareth
Addictions Research Group, University of South Wales, School of Psychology & Therapeutic Studies, Pontypridd, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02618. eCollection 2018.
Neuropsychological assessment is central to identifying and determining the extent of Alcohol-Related Cognitive Impairment (ARCI). The present systematic review aimed to synthesize and discuss the evidence appraising the neuropsychological tests used to assess ARCI in order to support clinicians and researchers in selecting appropriate tests for use with this population. We searched for studies investigating the psychometric, diagnostic and practical values of tools used in the screening, diagnosis, and assessment of Korsakoff's Syndrome (KS), Alcohol-Related Dementia (ARD), and those with a specific diagnosis of Alcohol-Related Brain Damage (ARBD). The following databases were searched in March 2016 and again in August 2018: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psych-INFO, ProQuest Psychology, and Science Direct. Study quality was assessed using a checklist designed by the authors to evaluate the specific factors contributing to robust and clearly reported studies in this area. A total of 43 studies were included following the screening of 3646 studies by title and abstract and 360 at full-text. Meta-analysis was not appropriate due to heterogeneity in the tests and ARCI samples investigated in the studies reviewed. Instead, review findings were narratively synthesized and divided according to five domains of assessment: cognitive screening, memory, executive function, intelligence and test batteries, and premorbid ability. Effect sizes () were calculated to supplement findings. Overall, several measures demonstrated sensitivity to the cognitive deficits associated with chronic alcoholism and an ability to differentiate between gradations of impairment. However, findings relating to the other psychometric qualities of the tests, including those important for the accurate assessment and monitoring of ARCI (e.g., test-retest reliability), were entirely absent or limited. Additionally, the synthesis of neuropsychological outcomes presented here supports the recent impetus for a move away from discrete diagnoses (e.g., KS, ARD) and the distinctions between them toward more broad and inclusive diagnostic conceptualizations of ARCI, thereby recognizing the heterogeneity in presentation. Based on the evidence reviewed, provisional recommendations for appropriate tests in each domain of assessment are presented, though further validation of most tests is warranted. Review findings can support efficient and evidenced-based test-selection and guide future research in this area.
神经心理学评估对于识别和确定酒精相关认知障碍(ARCI)的程度至关重要。本系统综述旨在综合并讨论评估用于评估ARCI的神经心理学测试的证据,以支持临床医生和研究人员为该人群选择合适的测试。我们搜索了调查用于筛查、诊断和评估柯萨科夫综合征(KS)、酒精相关痴呆(ARD)以及特定诊断为酒精相关脑损伤(ARBD)的工具的心理测量、诊断和实用价值的研究。2016年3月和2018年8月对以下数据库进行了搜索:医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、心理学文摘数据库(Psych-INFO)、ProQuest心理学数据库和科学Direct数据库。使用作者设计的清单评估研究质量,以评估有助于该领域研究稳健且报告清晰的具体因素。在通过标题和摘要筛选3646项研究以及全文筛选360项研究后,共纳入43项研究。由于所审查研究中测试和ARCI样本的异质性,不适合进行荟萃分析。相反,综述结果进行了叙述性综合,并根据五个评估领域进行划分:认知筛查、记忆、执行功能、智力和测试组合以及病前能力。计算效应量()以补充研究结果。总体而言,一些测量方法显示出对与慢性酒精中毒相关的认知缺陷的敏感性以及区分损伤程度的能力。然而,关于测试的其他心理测量质量的研究结果,包括那些对准确评估和监测ARCI很重要的结果(如重测信度),完全缺失或有限。此外,这里呈现的神经心理学结果的综合支持了最近从离散诊断(如KS、ARD)及其之间的区别转向更广泛和包容性更强的ARCI诊断概念化的趋势,从而认识到表现形式的异质性。基于所审查的证据,给出了每个评估领域合适测试的临时建议,不过大多数测试仍需进一步验证。综述结果可以支持高效且基于证据的测试选择,并指导该领域的未来研究。