Hirashima Natsuko
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2016;118(5):344-350.
As a member of the Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology's Committee to Improve the Medical Specialist System, I have used the Committee's discussions as my start- ing point for describing what action needs to be taken to update psychiatric medical specialist qualifications under the new medical specialist framework while retaining its key principles. The gist of the reform of the medical specialist system is that tasks such as clearing up confusion at clinical sites and restoring the public's trust in physicians should not be assigned to outside institutions. Instead, groups of physicians will themselves set up and run a self-reg- ulating organization that sets out their ideals as to quality, etc., and holds the profession to these ideals. To prevent any loss of professional pride and autonomy, they must establish, on their own initiative, a highly transparent system that the general public will accept, and which will support and develop high-quality medical professionals. In other words, building a system such as this cannot be considered separately from the process of educating specialized medical doctors. Medical specialists are expected to continue undergoing appropriate training and to maintain and enhance their competencies. Qualification as a medical specialist shows that the individual is continuing to undergo training to enhance his or her excellence as a medical spe- cialist and, at the same time, ensures his or her professional value. The key requirement for updating medical specialist qualifications is for the individual to be engaged in medical practice. Medical care provided at departments of psychiatry differs somewhat from that offered by other clinical departments and/or fields, since it covers a broad range of areas that can extend outside the clinical services offered at hospitals. Knowledge, skills and attitudes as a psychiatric medical specialist are evaluated based on a review of case reports. In addition to psychiatry-related content, training must cover themes related to pro- fessionalism such as medical ethics and legislation, as well as subjects necessary to obtain the latest medical knowledge such as clinical research and evidence-based medicine (EBM). Physi- cians intending to newly qualify as medical specialists need to be engaged in some sort of research, and to have the competency to compile and present the outcomes of their studies, as well as having a proven track record. Out of consideration to the actual circumstances, in the field of psychiatry, academic achievement is not a necessary condition for updating medical specialist qualifications. Japanese Medical Specialty Board supports this position. As defined in the upcoming reform of the medical specialist system, a medical specialist is a personal qualification. At the same time, it is individuals who play a role as a member of an autonomous group, responsible for maintaining the value of this qualification.
作为日本精神神经学会完善医学专科制度委员会的成员,我以委员会的讨论为出发点,阐述在新的医学专科框架下更新精神科医学专科资格需要采取哪些行动,同时保留其关键原则。医学专科制度改革的要点是,诸如消除临床现场的混乱以及恢复公众对医生的信任等任务,不应交给外部机构。相反,医生群体将自行设立并运营一个自我监管组织,该组织明确其对质量等方面的理想,并使该行业遵守这些理想。为防止职业自豪感和自主性的丧失,他们必须主动建立一个公众能够接受的高度透明的体系,该体系将支持和培养高质量的医学专业人员。换句话说,建立这样一个体系不能与培养专科医生的过程分开考虑。医学专科医生预计要持续接受适当的培训,并维持和提升自己的能力。医学专科资格表明个人正在持续接受培训,以提升其作为医学专科医生的卓越水平,同时确保其专业价值。更新医学专科资格的关键要求是个人从事医疗实践。精神科提供的医疗服务与其他临床科室和/或领域有所不同,因为它涵盖广泛的领域,可能延伸到医院提供的临床服务之外。作为精神科医学专科医生的知识、技能和态度是根据病例报告审查来评估的。除了与精神科相关的内容外,培训还必须涵盖与职业精神相关的主题,如医学伦理和立法,以及获取最新医学知识所需的科目,如临床研究和循证医学(EBM)。打算新获得医学专科资格的医生需要从事某种研究,具备整理和展示其研究成果的能力,并有可靠的记录。考虑到实际情况,在精神科领域,学术成就不是更新医学专科资格的必要条件。日本医学专科委员会支持这一立场。在即将到来的医学专科制度改革中所定义的,医学专科资格是一种个人资格。同时,是个人作为一个自治团体的成员发挥作用,负责维护这一资格的价值。