• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在加拿大公共住房中为脆弱的老年人实施社区 paramedicine 计划以减少 9-1-1 紧急医疗服务呼叫:一项多地点集群随机对照试验。

Reducing 9-1-1 Emergency Medical Service Calls By Implementing A Community Paramedicine Program For Vulnerable Older Adults In Public Housing In Canada: A Multi-Site Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Sep-Oct;23(5):718-729. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1566421. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1080/10903127.2019.1566421
PMID:30624150
Abstract

Older adults account for 38-48% of emergency medical service (EMS) calls, have more chronic diseases, and those with low income have lower quality of life. Mobile integrated health and community paramedicine may help address these health inequalities and reduce EMS calls. This study examines the effectiveness of the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic) program in decreasing EMS calls and improving health outcomes in low-income older adults. This was an open-label, pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted within subsidized public housing buildings for older adults in 5 paramedic services across Ontario, Canada. A total of 30 apartment buildings were eligible (>50 units, >60% of units occupied by older adults, unique postal code, available match for pairing). Paired buildings were randomly allocated to intervention (CP@clinic for one year) or control (usual care) via computer-generated randomization. The CP@clinic intervention is a community-based, paramedic-led, health promotion and disease prevention program held weekly in building common rooms. CP@clinic includes risk assessment with validated tools, decision support, health promotion, referrals to resources, and reports back to family doctors. All residents could participate, but only older adults (55 years and older) were included in analyses. The primary outcome was building-level EMS calls from paramedic service databases. Secondary outcomes were individual-level changes in chronic disease risk factors and quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs). Data were analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations to account for clustering by sites. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference in EMS calls (mean difference = -0.37/100 apartment units/month, 95%CI: -0.98 to 0.24). Sensitivity analysis excluding data from 2 building pairs with eligibility changes after intervention initiation revealed a significant difference in EMS calls in favor of the intervention buildings (mean difference = -0.90/100 apartment units/month, 95%CI: -1.54 to -0.26). At the individual level, there was a significant QALY increase (mean difference = 0.06, 95%CI: 0.02 to 0.10) and blood pressure decrease (systolic mean change = 3.65 mmHg, 95%CI: 2.37 to 4.94; diastolic mean change = 2.03 mmHg, 95%CI: 1.00 to 3.06). CP@clinic showed a significant decrease in EMS calls, decrease in BP, and improvement in QALYs among older adults in subsidizing public housing, suggesting this simple program should be replicated in other communities with public housing. Clinicaltrials.gov, Registration no. NCT02152891.

摘要

老年人占急救医疗服务(EMS)呼叫的 38-48%,他们有更多的慢性疾病,而收入较低的老年人生活质量较低。移动综合健康和社区护理人员可能有助于解决这些健康不平等问题,并减少 EMS 呼叫。本研究旨在探讨社区护理人员在诊所(CP@clinic)方案在减少低收入老年人的 EMS 呼叫和改善健康结果方面的有效性。这是一项在加拿大安大略省 5 个护理服务机构的补贴公共住房建筑内进行的、开放标签、务实、集群随机对照试验。共有 30 栋公寓楼符合条件(>50 个单元,>60%的单元由老年人居住,独特的邮政编码,可用于配对)。通过计算机生成的随机化对配对建筑物进行随机分配干预(CP@clinic 持续一年)或对照(常规护理)。CP@clinic 干预是一种基于社区的、由护理人员领导的、促进健康和预防疾病的方案,每周在建筑物的公共休息室举行。CP@clinic 包括使用经过验证的工具进行风险评估、决策支持、健康促进、转介资源和向家庭医生报告。所有居民都可以参加,但只有老年人(55 岁及以上)被纳入分析。主要结局是从护理服务数据库中获得的建筑物级别的 EMS 呼叫。次要结局是慢性病危险因素和调整后的生命年(QALY)的个体水平变化。使用广义估计方程分析数据,以考虑站点聚类。意向治疗分析显示,EMS 呼叫无显著差异(平均差异=-0.37/100 个公寓单元/月,95%CI:-0.98 至 0.24)。排除干预启动后资格发生变化的 2 对建筑物的数据后进行敏感性分析显示,干预组的 EMS 呼叫有显著差异(平均差异=-0.90/100 个公寓单元/月,95%CI:-1.54 至 -0.26)。在个体水平上,QALY 显著增加(平均差异=0.06,95%CI:0.02 至 0.10),血压下降(收缩压平均变化=3.65mmHg,95%CI:2.37 至 4.94;舒张压平均变化=2.03mmHg,95%CI:1.00 至 3.06)。CP@clinic 显示,在补贴公共住房的老年人中,EMS 呼叫显著减少,血压下降,QALY 改善,这表明该简单方案应在其他有公共住房的社区中复制。Clinicaltrials.gov,注册号 NCT02152891。

相似文献

1
Reducing 9-1-1 Emergency Medical Service Calls By Implementing A Community Paramedicine Program For Vulnerable Older Adults In Public Housing In Canada: A Multi-Site Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.在加拿大公共住房中为脆弱的老年人实施社区 paramedicine 计划以减少 9-1-1 紧急医疗服务呼叫:一项多地点集群随机对照试验。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Sep-Oct;23(5):718-729. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1566421. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
2
Evaluation of a community paramedicine health promotion and lifestyle risk assessment program for older adults who live in social housing: a cluster randomized trial.评价社区医护人员对居住在社会住房中的老年人进行健康促进和生活方式风险评估项目:一项整群随机试验。
CMAJ. 2018 May 28;190(21):E638-E647. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170740.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a community paramedicine programme for low-income seniors living in subsidised housing: the community paramedicine at clinic programme (CP@clinic).针对居住在保障性住房中的低收入老年人的社区护理计划的成本效益分析:诊所社区护理计划(CP@clinic)
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 27;10(10):e037386. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037386.
4
Effectiveness of a community paramedic-led health assessment and education initiative in a seniors' residence building: the Community Health Assessment Program through Emergency Medical Services (CHAP-EMS).社区护理人员主导的老年人居住建筑健康评估与教育倡议的成效:通过紧急医疗服务开展的社区健康评估项目(CHAP-EMS)
BMC Emerg Med. 2017 Mar 9;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12873-017-0119-4.
5
Rationale and methods of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of a Community Health Assessment Programme with Emergency Medical Services (CHAP-EMS) implemented on residents aged 55 years and older in subsidised seniors' housing buildings in Ontario, Canada.一项针对加拿大安大略省补贴型老年公寓中55岁及以上居民实施的社区健康评估计划与紧急医疗服务(CHAP-EMS)有效性的多中心随机对照试验的基本原理和方法。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 11;5(6):e008110. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008110.
6
Design and rationale for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial of the Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP) for social housing residents in Ontario and Quebec, Canada.加拿大安大略省和魁北克省社会住房居民心血管健康意识计划(CHAP)的实用群组随机试验的设计和原理。
Trials. 2019 Dec 23;20(1):760. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3806-5.
7
Rationale and methods of an Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Community Paramedicine at Home (CP@home) program for frequent users of emergency medical services in multiple Ontario regions: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.安大略省多个地区针对紧急医疗服务频繁使用者的家庭社区护理(CP@home)项目效果评估的基本原理和方法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Jan 23;20(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3107-4.
8
Development of a community health and wellness pilot in a subsidised seniors' apartment building in Hamilton, Ontario: Community Health Awareness Program delivered by Emergency Medical Services (CHAP-EMS).安大略省汉密尔顿市一个补贴型老年公寓楼社区健康与福祉试点项目的开展:由紧急医疗服务部门提供的社区健康意识项目(CHAP - EMS)。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Apr 1;8:113. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1061-8.
9
Perspectives from the frontline of two North American community paramedicine programs: an observational, ethnographic study.来自两个北美社区护理计划前线的观点:一项观察性的人种志研究。
Rural Remote Health. 2019 Feb;19(1):4888. doi: 10.22605/RRH4888. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
10
Perceived value and benefits of the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic) programme: a descriptive qualitative study.社区医疗计划(CP@clinic)的感知价值和益处:一项描述性定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 21;13(11):e076066. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076066.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Need and Demand for a Community Emergency Paramedic Strategy in the Ambulance Rescue System of Hamburg, Germany.评估德国汉堡急救系统中社区紧急护理人员策略的需求与要求。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;13(9):979. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13090979.
2
A qualitative RE-AIM evaluation of an embedded community paramedicine program in an Ontario Family Health Team.安大略省一个家庭健康团队中嵌入式社区护理计划的定性RE-AIM评估。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Mar 22;26(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02777-2.
3
Effects of the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic) program on the health behaviours of older adults residing in social housing: secondary outcomes of a cluster-randomized trial.
社区门诊护理(CP@clinic)项目对居住在社会住房中的老年人健康行为的影响:一项整群随机试验的次要结果
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21997-w.
4
Chronic disease prevalence and preventive care among Ontario social housing residents compared with the general population: a population-based cohort study.安大略省社会住房居民与普通人群相比的慢性病患病率及预防保健:一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2025 May 9;79(6):437-444. doi: 10.1136/jech-2024-222762.
5
Development and evaluation of a low-cost database solution for the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic) database.用于诊所社区护理(CP@clinic)数据库的低成本数据库解决方案的开发与评估。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Dec 27;3(12):e0000689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000689. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Older adults in social housing: A systemically vulnerable population that needs to be prioritized.社会住房中的老年人:一个需要优先考虑的系统性弱势群体。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Nov 27;2(12):qxae154. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae154. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
COVID-19 and social care screening for older adults in social housing: a CP@clinic adaptation.COVID-19 和社会住房中老年人的社会关怀筛查:CP@clinic 的适应。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05549-2.
8
Community Paramedicine Program in Social Housing and Health Service Utilization: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.社区医疗计划在社会住房和卫生服务利用中的应用:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2441288. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41288.
9
Timing of emergency medical services activations for falls.跌倒后紧急医疗服务启动的时机。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr Plus. 2024 Jun;1(2). doi: 10.1016/j.aggp.2024.100020. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
10
Beyond flashing lights and sirens: Community paramedicine as health safety nets for older adults.超越闪烁的灯光和警报声:社区护理作为老年人的健康安全网。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Sep;72(9):2640-2643. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19087. Epub 2024 Jul 15.