Barteit Sandra, Jahn Albrecht, Banda Sekelani S, Bärnighausen Till, Bowa Annel, Chileshe Geoffrey, Guzek Dorota, Jorge Margarida Mendes, Lüders Sigrid, Malunga Gregory, Neuhann Florian
Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 9;21(1):e12449. doi: 10.2196/12449.
E-learning has been heralded as a revolutionary force for medical education, especially for low-resource countries still suffering from a dire lack of health care workers. However, despite over two decades of e-learning endeavors and interventions across sub-Saharan Africa and other low- and middle-income countries, e-learning for medical education has not gained momentum and continues to fall short of the anticipated revolution. Many e-learning interventions have been cul-de-sac pilots that have not been scaled up but rather terminated after the pilot phase. This is usually a result of not adopting a system-wide approach, which leads to insufficient scope of training, insufficient technological maintenance and user support, unattainably high expectations, and unrealistic financial planning. Thus, a multitude of e-learning evaluations have failed to provide scientifically sound evidence of the effectiveness of e-learning for medical education in low-resource countries. Instead, it appears that technological development has overwhelmed rather than revolutionized medical education. The question of how to push e-learning into a higher gear in low-resource countries persists. Provision of e-learning as a technology is insufficient. E-learning needs to be vigorously and sustainably integrated into the local educational setting and aligned with national strategies and other national endeavors and interventions. Adhering to a standardized framework for the implementation and evaluation of e-learning endeavors is key, especially to bridge the gap in robust evidence that should also guide e-learning implementations. The primary objective of e-learning for medical education is to strengthen the health system in order to serve the population's health care needs and expectations. Currently, medical e-learning does not measure up to its potential or do justice to medical students in low-resource countries. Technology may help unfold the potential of e-learning, but an all-encompassing change is needed. This can only be achieved through a joint effort that follows a systematic and standardized framework, especially for implementation and evaluation.
电子学习被誉为医学教育的一股变革力量,对于仍严重缺乏医护人员的资源匮乏国家而言尤其如此。然而,尽管在撒哈拉以南非洲以及其他低收入和中等收入国家开展了二十多年的电子学习努力与干预措施,但医学教育的电子学习并未形成势头,仍未实现预期的变革。许多电子学习干预措施都是死胡同式的试点项目,未能扩大规模,而是在试点阶段之后就终止了。这通常是由于未采用全系统方法造成的,这种方法导致培训范围不足、技术维护和用户支持不足、期望过高难以实现以及财务规划不切实际。因此,众多电子学习评估未能提供科学合理的证据,证明电子学习在资源匮乏国家对医学教育的有效性。相反,技术发展似乎使医学教育不堪重负,而非带来变革。如何在资源匮乏国家推动电子学习加速发展的问题依然存在。仅提供电子学习技术是不够的。电子学习需要积极且可持续地融入当地教育环境,并与国家战略以及其他国家努力和干预措施保持一致。坚持电子学习努力实施和评估的标准化框架是关键,特别是要弥合有力证据方面的差距,这些证据也应指导电子学习的实施。医学教育电子学习的主要目标是加强卫生系统,以满足民众的医疗保健需求和期望。目前,医学电子学习未能发挥其潜力,也未公正对待资源匮乏国家的医学生。技术或许有助于发挥电子学习的潜力,但需要全面变革。这只能通过遵循系统和标准化框架的共同努力来实现,特别是在实施和评估方面。