Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 10;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0402-1.
Several studies on decentralisation have used the 'decision space' approach to assess the breadth of space made available to decision-makers at lower levels of the health system. However, in order to better understand how decentralisation becomes effective for the health sector, analysis should go beyond assessing decision space and include the dimensions of capacity and accountability. Building on Bossert's earlier work on the synergy of these dimensions, we analysed decision-making in the Philippines where governmental health services have been devolved to local governments since 1992.
Using a qualitative research design, we interviewed 27 key decision-makers at different levels of the Philippine health system and representing various local settings. We explored their perspectives on decision space, capacities and accountability in the health sector functions of planning, financing and budget allocation, programme implementation and service delivery, management of facilities, equipment and supplies, health workforce management, and data monitoring and utilisation. Analysis followed the Framework Method.
Across all functions, decision space for local decision-makers was assessed to be moderate or narrow despite 25 years of devolution. To improve decision-making in these functions, adjustments in local capacities should include, at the individual level, skills for strategic planning, management, priority-setting, evidence-informed policy-making and innovation in service delivery. At institutional levels, these desired capacities should include having a multi-stakeholder approach, generating revenues from local sources, partnering with the private sector and facilitating cooperation between local health facilities. On the other hand, adjustments in accountability should focus on the various mechanisms that can be enforced by the central level, not only to build the desired capacities and augment the inadequacies at local levels, but also to incentivise success and regulate failure by the local governments in performing the functions transferred to them.
To optimise decentralisation for the health sector, widening decision spaces for local decision-makers must be accompanied by the corresponding adjustments in capacities and accountability for promoting good decision-making at lower levels in the decentralised functions. Analysing the health system through the lens of this synergy is useful for exploring concrete policy adjustments in the Philippines as well as in other settings.
有几项关于权力下放的研究采用了“决策空间”方法来评估卫生系统较低层级决策者可利用的决策空间的广度。然而,为了更好地了解权力下放如何对卫生部门产生效果,分析不应仅限于评估决策空间,还应包括能力和问责制维度。本文在博塞特(Bossert)关于这些维度协同作用的早期工作基础上,分析了菲律宾的决策制定情况,菲律宾自 1992 年以来已将政府卫生服务下放给地方政府。
本研究采用定性研究设计,访谈了菲律宾卫生系统不同层级的 27 名关键决策者,代表了各种地方环境。我们探讨了他们对规划、筹资和预算分配、方案实施和服务提供、设施、设备和用品管理、卫生人力管理以及数据监测和利用等卫生部门职能的决策空间、能力和问责制的看法。分析遵循了框架方法。
尽管权力下放已经进行了 25 年,但在所有职能中,地方决策者的决策空间被评估为中等或狭窄。为了改善这些职能的决策制定,地方能力的调整应包括在个人层面上具备战略规划、管理、优先排序、循证决策制定和服务提供创新方面的技能。在机构层面上,这些期望的能力应包括采用多利益攸关方方法、从地方来源筹集收入、与私营部门合作以及促进地方卫生设施之间的合作。另一方面,问责制的调整应侧重于中央一级可以实施的各种机制,不仅是为了扩大地方决策者的决策空间,增强地方各级的能力,还为了激励地方政府在履行下放给它们的职能方面取得成功和规范失败。
为了优化卫生部门的权力下放,必须扩大地方决策者的决策空间,同时相应调整能力和问责制,以促进权力下放职能中较低层级的良好决策。通过这种协同作用分析卫生系统,有助于探索菲律宾以及其他环境中的具体政策调整。