Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jan;72(1):39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.019. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
Health sector decentralization has been widely adopted to improve delivery of health services. While many argue that institutional capacities and mechanisms of accountability required to transform decentralized decision-making into improvements in local health systems are lacking, few empirical studies exist which measure or relate together these concepts. Based on research instruments administered to a sample of 91 health sector decision-makers in 17 districts of Pakistan, this study analyzes relationships between three dimensions of decentralization: decentralized authority (referred to as "decision space"), institutional capacities, and accountability to local officials. Composite quantitative indicators of these three dimensions were constructed within four broad health functions (strategic and operational planning, budgeting, human resources management, and service organization/delivery) and on an overall/cross-function basis. Three main findings emerged. First, district-level respondents report varying degrees of each dimension despite being under a single decentralization regime and facing similar rules across provinces. Second, within dimensions of decentralization-particularly decision space and capacities-synergies exist between levels reported by respondents in one function and those reported in other functions (statistically significant coefficients of correlation ranging from ρ=0.22 to ρ=0.43). Third, synergies exist across dimensions of decentralization, particularly in terms of an overall indicator of institutional capacities (significantly correlated with both overall decision space (ρ=0.39) and accountability (ρ=0.23)). This study demonstrates that decentralization is a varied experience-with some district-level officials making greater use of decision space than others and that those who do so also tend to have more capacity to make decisions and are held more accountable to elected local officials for such choices. These findings suggest that Pakistan's decentralization policy should focus on synergies among dimensions of decentralization to encouraging more use of de jure decision space, work toward more uniform institutional capacity, and encourage greater accountability to local elected officials.
卫生部门权力下放已被广泛采用,以改善卫生服务的提供。虽然许多人认为,将权力下放的决策转化为改善地方卫生系统所需的体制能力和问责机制尚不存在,但很少有实证研究来衡量或关联这些概念。本研究基于对巴基斯坦 17 个地区的 91 名卫生部门决策者样本进行的研究工具,分析了权力下放的三个维度之间的关系:权力下放的权力(称为“决策空间”)、体制能力和对地方官员的问责制。这三个维度的综合定量指标是在四个广泛的卫生职能(战略和运营规划、预算编制、人力资源管理以及服务组织/提供)以及整体/跨职能的基础上构建的。有三个主要发现。第一,尽管处于单一的权力下放制度之下,且在全省范围内面临着相似的规则,但地区一级的受访者报告了这三个维度的不同程度。第二,在权力下放的各个维度内——尤其是决策空间和能力——受访者在一个职能中报告的维度与在其他职能中报告的维度之间存在协同作用(相关系数统计显著,范围从 ρ=0.22 到 ρ=0.43)。第三,权力下放的各个维度之间存在协同作用,特别是在体制能力的总体指标方面(与总体决策空间(ρ=0.39)和问责制(ρ=0.23)显著相关)。本研究表明,权力下放是一种多样化的经验——一些地区一级的官员比其他官员更多地利用决策空间,而那些这样做的官员也往往有更多的决策能力,并对地方民选官员负责。这些发现表明,巴基斯坦的权力下放政策应侧重于权力下放各维度之间的协同作用,以鼓励更多地利用法定决策空间,努力实现更统一的体制能力,并鼓励对地方民选官员承担更大的问责制。