Suppr超能文献

谁应为地方卫生服务做决策?菲律宾分权式卫生系统下决策偏好的混合方法研究

Who should decide for local health services? A mixed methods study of preferences for decision-making in the decentralized Philippine health system.

机构信息

Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

Balik Scientist Program, Department of Science and Technology Philippine Council for Health Research and Development (DOST PCHRD), Metro Manila, Philippines.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05174-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Philippines decentralized government health services through devolution to local governments in 1992. Over the years, opinions varied on the impact of devolved governance to decision-making for local health services. The objective of this study was to analyze decision-makers' perspectives on who should be making decisions for local health services and on their preferred structure of health service governance should they be able to change the situation.

METHODS

We employed a mixed methods approach that included an online survey in one region and in-depth interviews with purposively-selected decision-makers in the Philippine health system. Study participants were asked about their perspectives on decision-making in the functions of planning, health financing, resource management, human resources for health, health service delivery, and data management and monitoring. Analysis of survey results through visualization of data on charts was complemented by the themes that emerged from the qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews based on the Framework Method.

RESULTS

We received 24 online survey responses and interviewed 27 other decision-makers. Survey respondents expressed a preference to shift decision-making away from the local politician in favor of the local health officer in five functions. Most survey participants also preferred re-centralization. Analysis of the interviews suggested that the preferences expressed were likely driven by an expectation that re-centralization would provide a solution to the perceived politicization in decision-making and the reliance of local governments on central support.

CONCLUSIONS

Rather than re-centralize the health system, one policy option for consideration for the Philippines would be to maintain devolution but with a revitalized role for the central level to maintain oversight over local governments and regulate their decision-making for the functions. Decentralization, whether in the Philippines or elsewhere, must not only transfer decision-making responsibility to local levels but also ensure that those granted with the decision space could perform decision-making with adequate capacities and could grasp the importance of health services.

摘要

背景

菲律宾于 1992 年通过权力下放将政府卫生服务去中心化。多年来,对于权力下放对地方卫生服务决策的影响,意见不一。本研究的目的是分析决策者对谁应该为地方卫生服务做出决策的看法,以及如果他们能够改变现状,他们对卫生服务治理结构的偏好。

方法

我们采用了混合方法,包括在菲律宾一个地区进行在线调查和对菲律宾卫生系统中精心挑选的决策者进行深入访谈。研究参与者被问及他们对规划、卫生筹资、资源管理、卫生人力资源、卫生服务提供以及数据管理和监测等功能的决策的看法。通过图表可视化数据对调查结果进行分析,补充了基于框架方法对深入访谈的定性分析中出现的主题。

结果

我们收到了 24 份在线调查回复,并采访了另外 27 位决策者。调查受访者表示,在五个职能中,他们更倾向于将决策权从地方政客手中转移到地方卫生官员手中。大多数调查参与者也更倾向于重新集中化。对访谈的分析表明,表达的偏好可能是由于预期重新集中化将为决策中的政治化和地方政府对中央支持的依赖提供解决方案。

结论

菲律宾的一个政策选择不是重新集中卫生系统,而是考虑维持权力下放,但中央层面要加强监督和规范地方政府的决策,以维护其作用。无论是在菲律宾还是其他地方,权力下放不仅要将决策权下放给地方一级,而且还要确保授予决策空间的人能够在适当的能力下进行决策,并认识到卫生服务的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4447/7158124/02fdf9af3d33/12913_2020_5174_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验