Lee J E, Kim S H, Shin S K, Wachholtz A, Lee J H
Department of Psychology, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea.
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA.
Pain Res Manag. 2018 Dec 2;2018:6038406. doi: 10.1155/2018/6038406. eCollection 2018.
Although the evidence of the attentional bias of chronic pain individuals toward pain-related information is established in the literature, few studies examined the time course of attention toward pain stimuli and the role of pain catastrophizing on attentional engagement toward pain-related information. This study examined the time course of attention to pain-related information and the role of pain catastrophizing on attentional engagement for pain-related information. Participants were fifty young adult participants with chronic pain (35% male, 65% female; M = 21.8 years) who completed self-report questionnaires assessing pain catastrophizing levels (Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)), depression (the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)), anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)), and pain disability (the Pain Disability Index: (PDI)). Attentional engagements to pain- and anger-related information were measured by the eye tracker. Significant interaction effects were found between (1) time and stimulus type for pain-related information ( (5, 245) = 11.55, < 0.001) and (2) bias scores and pain catastrophizing ( (1, 48) = 6.736, < 0.05). These results indicated that the degree of increase for pain bias scores were significantly greater than anger bias scores as levels of pain catastrophizing increased. Results of the present study provided the evidence for the attentional bias and information processing model which has clinical implications; high levels of pain catastrophizing may impair individuals' ability to cope with chronic pain by increasing attentional engagement toward pain-related information. The present study can add knowledge to attentional bias and pain research as this study investigated the time course of attention and the role of pain catastrophizing on attentional engagement toward pain-related information for adults with chronic pain conditions.
尽管慢性疼痛个体对疼痛相关信息存在注意偏向的证据在文献中已得到证实,但很少有研究考察对疼痛刺激的注意时间进程以及疼痛灾难化对与疼痛相关信息的注意参与度的作用。本研究考察了对疼痛相关信息的注意时间进程以及疼痛灾难化在对疼痛相关信息的注意参与度方面的作用。参与者为五十名患有慢性疼痛的年轻成年个体(35%为男性,65%为女性;平均年龄 = 21.8岁),他们完成了自我报告问卷,以评估疼痛灾难化水平(疼痛灾难化量表(PCS))、抑郁(流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES - D))、焦虑(状态 - 特质焦虑量表(STAI))和疼痛残疾程度(疼痛残疾指数:(PDI))。通过眼动仪测量对疼痛和愤怒相关信息的注意参与度。研究发现:(1)对于疼痛相关信息,时间和刺激类型之间存在显著的交互作用(F(5, 245) = 11.55,p < 0.001);(2)偏向分数和疼痛灾难化之间存在显著交互作用(F(1, 48) = 6.736,p < 0.05)。这些结果表明,随着疼痛灾难化水平的增加,疼痛偏向分数的增加程度显著大于愤怒偏向分数。本研究结果为具有临床意义的注意偏向和信息加工模型提供了证据;高水平的疼痛灾难化可能通过增加对疼痛相关信息的注意参与度来损害个体应对慢性疼痛的能力。本研究能够为注意偏向和疼痛研究增添知识,因为该研究考察了注意的时间进程以及疼痛灾难化在患有慢性疼痛的成年人对疼痛相关信息的注意参与度方面的作用。