• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会阶层对个体在荣誉-金钱博弈中决策倾向的影响:社会价值还是工具价值?

The Effects of Social Class on Individuals' Decision-Making Tendencies in a Prestige-Money Game: Social Value or Instrumental Value?

机构信息

Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, 3663 Zhongshan North Road, Putuo District, Shanghai, 200062, China.

Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, 100 Guilin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200234, China.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2019 Dec;35(4):1283-1302. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09827-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-019-09827-2
PMID:30632011
Abstract

Through a series of three experiments, this study explored the possible influence of social class on the decision-making tendency of prestige-seeking in a Prestige-Money Game, and further explored the internal sources of such influence. In Experiment 1, the participants' social class was manipulated to examine whether there were class effects in prestige-seeking when individuals of different social classes were paired together in a Prestige-Money Game. In Experiment 2, social rank, which only contained ranking differences, was adopted as a more abstract proxy variable for social class to investigate whether class effects still existed in prestige-seeking in a Prestige-Money Game. Based on the results of Experiment 1 and 2, Experiment 3 further explored the sources of motivation for prestige-seeking among subjects of different social class. The results showed that upper-class individuals showed greater money-seeking tendencies when facing an upper-class opponent, and showed greater prestige-seeking tendencies when facing a lower-class opponent. Such tendencies were derived from social rank; instrumental value played a substantial role. The game strategy of lower-class individuals were mainly oriented toward their personal needs. Specifically, they showed greater prestige-seeking when facing an upper-class opponent, and showed greater money-seeking when facing a lower-class opponent. Such tendencies were derived from the activation of their social class identity; the role of instrumental value was limited. These findings suggest that the essential differences in the game tendencies of individuals from different social classes in a Prestige-Money Game may originate from the fact that different social classes have different demands for the instrumental value and social value of prestige.

摘要

本研究通过三个实验,探讨了社会阶层对声望寻求决策倾向的可能影响,并进一步探究了这种影响的内在来源。实验 1 通过操纵被试的社会阶层,考察了在声望金钱博弈中,不同社会阶层的个体配对时是否存在声望寻求的阶层效应。实验 2 采用仅包含排名差异的社会等级作为社会阶层的更抽象替代变量,进一步探讨了在声望金钱博弈中,声望寻求是否仍然存在阶层效应。基于实验 1 和实验 2 的结果,实验 3 进一步探究了不同社会阶层被试的声望寻求动机来源。结果表明,上层个体在面对上层对手时表现出更大的金钱寻求倾向,而在面对下层对手时表现出更大的声望寻求倾向。这种倾向源于社会等级;工具价值起着重要作用。下层个体的游戏策略主要以个人需求为导向。具体来说,他们在面对上层对手时表现出更大的声望寻求,而在面对下层对手时表现出更大的金钱寻求。这种倾向源于他们的社会阶层身份的激活;工具价值的作用有限。这些发现表明,不同社会阶层个体在声望金钱博弈中的游戏倾向的根本差异可能源于不同社会阶层对声望的工具价值和社会价值的不同需求。

相似文献

1
The Effects of Social Class on Individuals' Decision-Making Tendencies in a Prestige-Money Game: Social Value or Instrumental Value?社会阶层对个体在荣誉-金钱博弈中决策倾向的影响:社会价值还是工具价值?
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Dec;35(4):1283-1302. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09827-2.
2
Correction to: The Effects of Social Class on Individuals' Decision-Making Tendencies in a Prestige-Money Game: Social Value or Instrumental Value?对《社会阶层对个人在声望-金钱博弈中决策倾向的影响:社会价值还是工具价值?》的勘误
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Dec;36(4):1411. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09849-w.
3
Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence.两种登顶的途径:有证据表明,支配地位和威望是通往社会地位和影响力的两条截然不同但可行的途径。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Jan;104(1):103-25. doi: 10.1037/a0030398. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
4
When fertile, women seek status via prestige but not dominance.当女性有生育能力时,她们通过追求威望而不是支配地位来获得地位。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 16;119(46):e2205451119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2205451119. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
5
Dominance, prestige, and the role of leveling in human social hierarchy and equality.统治、威望以及等级划分在人类社会等级和平等中的作用。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Jun;33:238-244. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
6
A Status-Seeking Account of Psychological Entitlement.寻求地位的心理特权解释。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Jul;45(7):1113-1128. doi: 10.1177/0146167218808501. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
7
Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making.敌友之间:社会决策中内隐可信度判断的影响
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):796-803. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
8
Is status a zero-sum game? Zero-sum beliefs increase people's preference for dominance but not prestige.地位是一场零和博弈吗?零和信念会增加人们对支配地位而非威望的偏好。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Feb;152(2):389-409. doi: 10.1037/xge0001282. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
9
Life History Strategies, Prestige, and Dominance: An Evolutionary Developmental View of Social Hierarchy.生活史策略、威望与支配地位:社会等级制度的进化发展视角
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Apr;49(4):627-641. doi: 10.1177/01461672221078667. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
10
Two signals of social rank: Prestige and dominance are associated with distinct nonverbal displays.两种社会地位信号:威望和支配地位与不同的非言语表现有关。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Jan;118(1):89-120. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000181. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Late-life psychiatric factors and life satisfaction are associated with cognitive errors: evidence from an experimental module of a large-scale survey in India.晚年精神因素和生活满意度与认知错误有关:来自印度大规模调查实验模块的证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 29;14(1):25917. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76180-9.
2
Decision-Making and the Alternative Five Factor Personality Model: Exploring the Role of Personality Traits, Age, Sex and Social Position.决策与替代性五因素人格模型:探索人格特质、年龄、性别和社会地位的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 27;12:717705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717705. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategically Stunning: The Professional Motivations Behind the Lipstick Effect.《口红效应:专业动机背后的战略性惊艳》
Psychol Sci. 2016 Aug;27(8):1157-68. doi: 10.1177/0956797616654677. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
2
Trickle-Down Preferences: Preferential Conformity to High Status Peers in Fashion Choices.涓滴偏好:时尚选择中对高地位同伴的优先从众行为
PLoS One. 2016 May 4;11(5):e0153448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153448. eCollection 2016.
3
Social-Class Differences in Consumer Choices: Working-Class Individuals Are More Sensitive to Choices of Others Than Middle-Class Individuals.
消费者选择中的社会阶层差异:工人阶级个体比中产阶级个体对他人的选择更敏感。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Apr;42(4):430-43. doi: 10.1177/0146167216634043.
4
Failure at the top: How power undermines collaborative performance.高层的失败:权力如何破坏协作绩效。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Feb;110(2):261-86. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000045.
5
Status Decreases Dominance in the West but Increases Dominance in the East.地位在西方下降,但在东方上升。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Feb;27(2):127-37. doi: 10.1177/0956797615612694. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
6
Social status modulates the neural response to unfairness.社会地位会调节对不公平现象的神经反应。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Jan;11(1):1-10. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv086. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature.追求地位是人类的基本动机吗?对实证文献的回顾。
Psychol Bull. 2015 May;141(3):574-601. doi: 10.1037/a0038781. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
8
Social class, power, and selfishness: when and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically.社会阶层、权力与自私:上层和下层阶级个体在何时以及为何做出不道德行为。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Mar;108(3):436-49. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000008. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
9
Effects of "face" consciousness on status consumption among Chinese consumers: perceived social value as a mediator.“面子”意识对中国消费者地位消费的影响:感知社会价值作为中介变量
Psychol Rep. 2015 Feb;116(1):280-91. doi: 10.2466/17.07.PR0.116k11w3. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
10
The undervalued self: social class and self-evaluation.被低估的自我:社会阶层与自我评价。
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 5;5:1404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01404. eCollection 2014.