Department of Clinical Microbiology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, PMB, UPO, Kumasi 00233, Ghana.
Kumasi Centre for Collaborative Research in Tropical Medicine, PMB, UPO, KNUST, Kumasi 00233, Ghana.
Viruses. 2019 Jan 9;11(1):43. doi: 10.3390/v11010043.
Known human coronaviruses are believed to have originated in animals and made use of intermediate hosts for transmission to humans. The intermediate hosts of most of the human coronaviruses are known, but not for HCoV-NL63. This study aims to assess the possible role of some major domestic livestock species as intermediate hosts of HCoV-NL63. We developed a testing algorithm for high throughput screening of livestock sera with ELISA and confirmation with recombinant immunofluorescence assay testing for antibodies against HCoV-NL63 in livestock. Optimization of the ELISA showed a capability of the assay to significantly distinguish HCoV-NL63 from HCoV-229E (U = 27.50, < 0.001) and HCoV-OC43 (U = 55.50, < 0.001) in coronavirus-characterized sera. Evaluation of the assay with collected human samples showed no significant difference in mean optical density values of immunofluorescence-classified HCoV-NL63-positive and HCoV-NL63-negative samples ( (1, 215) = 0.437, = 0.509). All the top 5% ( = 8) most reactive human samples tested by ELISA were HCoV-NL63 positive by immunofluorescence testing. In comparison, only a proportion (84%, = 42) of the top 25% were positive by immunofluorescence testing, indicating an increased probability of the highly ELISA reactive samples testing positive by the immunofluorescence assay. None of the top 5% most ELISA reactive livestock samples were positive for HCoV-NL63-related viruses by immunofluorescence confirmation. Ghanaian domestic livestock are not likely intermediate hosts of HCoV-NL63-related coronaviruses.
已知的人类冠状病毒据信起源于动物,并利用中间宿主将其传播给人类。大多数人类冠状病毒的中间宿主已为人知,但 HCoV-NL63 除外。本研究旨在评估一些主要的家畜物种作为 HCoV-NL63 中间宿主的可能作用。我们开发了一种用于检测家畜血清中 HCoV-NL63 抗体的 ELISA 高通量筛选检测方法,并通过重组免疫荧光检测进行确认。ELISA 的优化显示该检测方法能够显著区分 HCoV-NL63 与 HCoV-229E(U = 27.50,<0.001)和 HCoV-OC43(U = 55.50,<0.001)。用人收集的样本评估该检测方法,发现免疫荧光分类的 HCoV-NL63 阳性和 HCoV-NL63 阴性样本的平均光密度值无显著差异((1, 215) = 0.437, = 0.509)。ELISA 检测中反应性最强的前 5%(= 8)个样本均通过免疫荧光检测呈 HCoV-NL63 阳性。相比之下,只有 25%的前 25%样本通过免疫荧光检测呈阳性,这表明 ELISA 反应性强的样本通过免疫荧光检测呈阳性的可能性增加。通过免疫荧光确认,ELISA 反应性最强的前 5%家畜样本中没有一个对 HCoV-NL63 相关病毒呈阳性。加纳的家畜不太可能是 HCoV-NL63 相关冠状病毒的中间宿主。