Suppr超能文献

应用全病毒酶联免疫吸附试验、间接荧光抗体试验和病毒中和试验检测猪血清中的猪 1 型副流感病毒抗体。

Detection of porcine parainfluenza virus type-1 antibody in swine serum using whole-virus ELISA, indirect fluorescence antibody and virus neutralizing assays.

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, 1800 Christensen Drive, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.

Department of Statistics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Iowa State University, 2438 Osborn Drive, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.

出版信息

BMC Vet Res. 2022 Mar 21;18(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03196-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Porcine parainfluenza virus 1 (PPIV-1) is a respiratory virus in the family Paramyxoviridae and genus Respirovirus. It is closely related to bovine parainfluenza virus 3, human parainfluenza virus 1, and Sendai virus. Recent reports suggest PPIV-1 is widespread in swine herds in the United States and abroad. However, seroprevalence studies and the ability to evaluate cross neutralization between heterologous strains is not possible without validated antibody assays. This study describes the development of an indirect fluorescence antibody (IFA) assay, a whole virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (wv-ELISA) and a serum virus neutralization (SVN) assay for the detection of PPIV-1 antibodies using 521 serum samples collected from three longitudinal studies and two different challenge strains in swine.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) of the wv-ELISA (95% CI, 0.93-0.98) was significantly higher (p = 0.03) compared to the IFA (95% CI, 0.90-0.96). However, no significant difference was observed between the IFA and wv-ELISA when compared to the SVN (95% CI, 0.92-0.97). All three assays demonstrated relatively uniform results at a 99% true negative rate, with only 11 disagreements observed between the IFA, wv-ELISA and SVN.

CONCLUSIONS

All three serology assays detected PPIV-1 antibody in swine serum of known status that was collected from experimental studies. The SVN detected seroconversion earlier compared to the IFA and the wv-ELISA. Both the wv-ELISA and the SVN had similar diagnostic performance, while the IFA was not as sensitive as the wv-ELISA. All three assays are considered valid for routine diagnostic use. These assays will be important for future studies to screen seronegative swine for research, determine PPIV-1 seroprevalence, and to evaluate vaccine efficacy against PPIV-1 under experimental and field conditions.

摘要

背景

猪副流感病毒 1 型(PPIV-1)是副黏病毒科、副黏病毒属的呼吸道病毒,与牛副流感病毒 3 型、人副流感病毒 1 型和仙台病毒关系密切。最近的报道表明,PPIV-1 在美国和国外的猪群中广泛存在。然而,如果没有经过验证的抗体检测方法,就无法进行血清阳性率研究和评估异源毒株之间的交叉中和能力。本研究描述了间接荧光抗体(IFA)检测、全病毒酶联免疫吸附试验(wv-ELISA)和血清病毒中和(SVN)试验的建立,用于检测使用来自三个纵向研究和两种不同猪攻毒毒株的 521 份血清样本中的 PPIV-1 抗体。

结果

wv-ELISA 的曲线下面积(AUC,95%CI,0.93-0.98)明显高于 IFA(95%CI,0.90-0.96)(p=0.03)。然而,IFA 与 SVN 之间的 AUC 没有显著差异(95%CI,0.92-0.97)。在 99%的真阴性率下,所有三种检测方法的结果都相对一致,只有 11 个不一致的结果在 IFA、wv-ELISA 和 SVN 之间观察到。

结论

所有三种血清学检测方法都能检测到来自实验研究的已知状态的猪血清中的 PPIV-1 抗体。与 IFA 和 wv-ELISA 相比,SVN 更早地检测到血清转换。wv-ELISA 和 SVN 的诊断性能相似,而 IFA 不如 wv-ELISA 敏感。所有三种检测方法都被认为可用于常规诊断。这些检测方法将对未来的研究非常重要,用于筛选研究用的血清阴性猪,确定 PPIV-1 的血清阳性率,并评估疫苗对 PPIV-1 的效力,包括在实验和现场条件下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/8935814/5f613c282091/12917_2022_3196_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验