Suppr超能文献

描述三家学术医疗中心 ICU 病房交接班的特点:过程和看法。

Characterising ICU-ward handoffs at three academic medical centres: process and perceptions.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California San Francisco Medical Center at Parnassus, San Francisco, California, USA

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Aug;28(8):627-634. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008328. Epub 2019 Jan 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited literature about physician handoffs between the intensive care unit (ICU) and the ward, and best practices have not been described. These patients are uniquely vulnerable given their medical complexity, diagnostic uncertainty and reduced monitoring intensity. We aimed to characterise the structure, perceptions and processes of ICU-ward handoffs across three teaching hospitals using multimodal methods: by identifying the handoff components involved in communication failures and describing common processes of patient transfer.

METHODS

We conducted a study at three academic medical centres using two methods to characterise the structure, perceptions and processes of ICU-ward transfers: (1) an anonymous resident survey characterising handoff communication during ICU-ward transfer, and (2) comparison of process maps to identify similarities and differences between ICU-ward transfer processes across the three hospitals.

RESULTS

Of the 295 internal medicine residents approached, 175 (59%) completed the survey. 87% of the respondents recalled at least one adverse event related to communication failure during ICU-ward transfer. 95% agreed that a well-structured handoff template would improve ICU-ward transfer. Rehabilitation needs, intravenous access/hardware and risk assessments for readmission to the ICU were the most frequently omitted or incorrectly communicated components of handoff notes. More than 60% of the respondents reported that notes omitted or miscommunicated pending results, active subspecialty consultants, nutrition and intravenous fluids, antibiotics, and healthcare decision-maker information at least twice per month. Despite variable process across the three sites, all process maps demonstrated flaws and potential for harm in critical steps of the ICU-ward transition.

CONCLUSION

In this multisite study, despite significant process variation across sites, almost all resident physicians recalled an adverse event related to the ICU-ward handoff. Future work is needed to determine best practices for ICU-ward handoffs at academic medical centres.

摘要

背景

目前关于重症监护病房(ICU)与病房之间的医生交接班的文献有限,也尚未描述最佳实践。这些患者由于其医疗复杂性、诊断不确定性和减少的监测强度而变得尤为脆弱。我们旨在使用多种方法来描述三个教学医院之间的 ICU 病房交接的结构、感知和流程:通过识别沟通失败所涉及的交接组件,并描述常见的患者转移流程。

方法

我们在三个学术医疗中心进行了一项研究,使用两种方法来描述 ICU 病房交接的结构、感知和流程:(1)一项匿名住院医师调查,描述 ICU 病房交接期间的交接沟通;(2)比较流程图,以识别三个医院之间 ICU 病房交接流程的相似点和不同点。

结果

在接触的 295 名内科住院医师中,有 175 名(59%)完成了调查。87%的受访者回忆起至少一次与 ICU 病房交接期间沟通失败相关的不良事件。95%的受访者同意,一个结构良好的交接模板将改善 ICU 病房交接。康复需求、静脉通路/硬件以及 ICU 再入院风险评估是交接记录中最常被遗漏或错误传达的部分。超过 60%的受访者报告说,记录中至少每月两次遗漏或错误传达待处理结果、活跃的专科顾问、营养和静脉输液、抗生素以及医疗决策者信息。尽管三个地点的流程存在差异,但所有流程图都在 ICU 病房过渡的关键步骤中显示出缺陷和潜在的危害。

结论

在这项多地点研究中,尽管各地点的流程存在显著差异,但几乎所有住院医师都回忆起与 ICU 病房交接相关的不良事件。未来需要确定学术医疗中心 ICU 病房交接的最佳实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验