Fukui Elle Mizuki, Lyons Patrick G, Harris Emily, McCune Emma K, Rojas Juan C, Santhosh Lekshmi
School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, John T Milliken Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, United States.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Feb 6;12:e40918. doi: 10.2196/40918.
The intensive care unit (ICU)-ward transfer poses a particularly high-risk period for patients. The period after transfer has been associated with adverse events and additional work for care teams related to miscommunication or omission of information. Standardized handoff processes have been found to reduce communication errors and adverse patient events in other clinical environments but are understudied at the ICU-ward interface. We previously developed an electronic ICU-ward transfer tool, ICU-PAUSE, which embeds the key elements and diagnostic reasoning to facilitate a safe transfer of care at ICU discharge.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the implementation process of the ICU-PAUSE handoff tool across 10 academic medical centers, including the rate of adoption and acceptability, as perceived by clinical care teams.
ICU-PAUSE will be implemented in the medical ICU across 10 academic hospitals, with each site customizing the tool to their institution's needs. Our mixed methods study will include a combination of a chart review, quantitative surveys, and qualitative interviews. After a 90-day implementation period, we will conduct a retrospective chart review to evaluate the rate of uptake of ICU-PAUSE. We will also conduct postimplementation surveys of providers to assess perceptions of the tool and its impact on the frequency of communication errors and adverse events during ICU-ward transfers. Lastly, we will conduct semistructured interviews of faculty stakeholders with subsequent thematic analysis with the goal of identifying benefits and barriers in implementing and using ICU-PAUSE.
ICU-PAUSE was piloted in the medical ICU at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, the teaching hospital of Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, in 2019. As of July 2022, implementation of ICU-PAUSE is ongoing at 6 of 10 participating sites. Our results will be published in 2023.
Our process of ICU-PAUSE implementation embeds each step of template design, uptake, and customization in the needs of users and key stakeholders. Here, we introduce our approach to evaluate its acceptability, usability, and impact on communication errors according to the tenets of sociotechnical theory. We anticipate that ICU-PAUSE will offer an effective handoff tool for the ICU-ward transition that can be generalized to other institutions.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40918.
重症监护病房(ICU)向普通病房的转运对患者来说是一个特别高风险的时期。转运后的这段时间与不良事件以及护理团队因信息沟通不畅或遗漏而产生的额外工作有关。在其他临床环境中,标准化的交接班流程已被证明可以减少沟通错误和不良患者事件,但在ICU与普通病房交接方面的研究较少。我们之前开发了一种电子ICU病房转运工具ICU-PAUSE,它嵌入了关键要素和诊断推理,以促进ICU出院时的安全护理交接。
本研究的目的是评估ICU-PAUSE交接班工具在10个学术医疗中心的实施过程,包括临床护理团队所感知的采用率和可接受性。
ICU-PAUSE将在10家学术医院的内科ICU中实施,每个站点根据其机构的需求对该工具进行定制。我们的混合方法研究将包括病历审查、定量调查和定性访谈。在90天的实施期后,我们将进行回顾性病历审查,以评估ICU-PAUSE的采用率。我们还将对提供者进行实施后调查,以评估他们对该工具的看法及其对ICU病房转运期间沟通错误频率和不良事件的影响。最后,我们将对教职员工利益相关者进行半结构化访谈,并随后进行主题分析,以确定实施和使用ICU-PAUSE的益处和障碍。
2019年,ICU-PAUSE在圣路易斯华盛顿大学医学院的教学医院巴恩斯-犹太医院的内科ICU进行了试点。截至2022年7月,10个参与站点中有6个正在实施ICU-PAUSE。我们的结果将于2023年发表。
我们的ICU-PAUSE实施过程将模板设计、采用和定制的每一步都融入了用户和关键利益相关者的需求。在此,我们介绍我们的方法,以根据社会技术理论的原则评估其可接受性、可用性以及对沟通错误的影响。我们预计ICU-PAUSE将为ICU向普通病房的过渡提供一种有效的交接班工具,并可推广到其他机构。
国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/40918。