• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Idylla™呼吸道(IFV-RSV)检测板与GeneXpert Xpert®流感/呼吸道合胞病毒检测的比较:一项针对鼻咽和中鼻甲样本的回顾性研究。

Comparison of the Idylla™ Respiratory (IFV-RSV) panel with the GeneXpert Xpert® Flu/RSV assay: a retrospective study with nasopharyngeal and midturbinate samples.

作者信息

Wouters Yannick, Keyaerts Els, Rector Annabel, Van Even Ellen, Vissers Steven, Koletzki Diana, Pattery Theresa, Rousseau Els, Van Ranst Marc, Laffut Wim

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Heilig Hart Hospital Lier, Mechelsestraat 24, 2500 Lier, Belgium.

Laboratory of Clinical and Epidemiological Virology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 May;94(1):33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.11.022. Epub 2018 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.11.022
PMID:30638655
Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the performance of the Idylla™ Respiratory (IFV-RSV) panel to the GeneXpert Xpert® Flu/RSV assay and establish the performance of a midturbinate swab compared to nasopharyngeal sampling. Considering GeneXpert® assay as imperfect reference standard, a positive percentage agreement between both assays of 98-100% for influenza A and 96-99% for influenza B could be calculated when 354 nasopharyngeal and 325 midturbinate swabs were retrospectively analyzed. Comparing midturbinate samples to nasopharyngeal specimens of 321 subjects, positive percentage agreement varied from 42% to 94% depending on both target virus and assay used. Negative percentage agreements ranged from 98% to 100% for both methods and sample type comparison. The Idylla™ assay showed excellent performance compared to the GeneXpert® assay for the detection of influenza virus. The study also showed a slightly better performance for nasopharyngeal sampling compared to the use of a midturbinate swab.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较Idylla™呼吸道(IFV-RSV)检测板与GeneXpert Xpert®流感/呼吸道合胞病毒检测的性能,并确定中鼻甲拭子与鼻咽采样相比的性能。将GeneXpert®检测视为不完善的参考标准,在对354份鼻咽拭子和325份中鼻甲拭子进行回顾性分析时,两种检测方法对甲型流感的阳性百分比一致性为98%-100%,对乙型流感为96%-99%。在比较321名受试者的中鼻甲样本与鼻咽标本时,根据目标病毒和所用检测方法的不同,阳性百分比一致性在42%至94%之间。两种方法和样本类型比较的阴性百分比一致性在98%至100%之间。与GeneXpert®检测相比,Idylla™检测在流感病毒检测方面表现出色。该研究还表明,与使用中鼻甲拭子相比,鼻咽采样的性能略好。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Idylla™ Respiratory (IFV-RSV) panel with the GeneXpert Xpert® Flu/RSV assay: a retrospective study with nasopharyngeal and midturbinate samples.Idylla™呼吸道(IFV-RSV)检测板与GeneXpert Xpert®流感/呼吸道合胞病毒检测的比较:一项针对鼻咽和中鼻甲样本的回顾性研究。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 May;94(1):33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.11.022. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
2
The performance of Luminex ARIES Flu A/B & RSV and Cepheid Xpert Flu/RSV XC for the detection of influenza A, influenza B, and respiratory syncytial virus in prospective patient samples.Luminex ARIES Flu A/B & RSV 和 Cepheid Xpert Flu/RSV XC 在前瞻性患者样本中检测甲型流感、乙型流感和呼吸道合胞病毒的性能。
J Clin Virol. 2017 Oct;95:84-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
3
Performance Characteristics of Xpert Flu/RSV XC Assay.Xpert Flu/RSV XC检测的性能特征
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Aug;53(8):2720-1. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00972-15. Epub 2015 May 27.
4
Comparison of Six Sample-to-Answer Influenza A/B and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Nucleic Acid Amplification Assays Using Respiratory Specimens from Children.比较六种样本到答案的流感 A/B 和呼吸道合胞病毒核酸扩增检测方法,使用儿童呼吸道标本。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Oct 25;56(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00930-18. Print 2018 Nov.
5
Accurate PCR Detection of Influenza A/B and Respiratory Syncytial Viruses by Use of Cepheid Xpert Flu+RSV Xpress Assay in Point-of-Care Settings: Comparison to Prodesse ProFlu.利用 Cepheid Xpert Flu+RSV Xpress 检测试剂盒在即时检测点对流感 A/B 和呼吸道合胞病毒的精确 PCR 检测:与 Prodesse ProFlu 的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jan 24;56(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01237-17. Print 2018 Feb.
6
Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the Luminex Aries Flu A/B & RSV Assay for Pediatric and Adult Respiratory Tract Specimens.用于儿科和成人呼吸道标本的Luminex Aries流感A/B和呼吸道合胞病毒检测的多中心临床评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Aug;55(8):2431-2438. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00318-17. Epub 2017 May 24.
7
Comparison of Cepheid Xpert Flu/RSV XC and BioFire FilmArray for Detection of Influenza A, Influenza B, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus.Cepheid Xpert Flu/RSV XC与BioFire FilmArray在检测甲型流感、乙型流感和呼吸道合胞病毒方面的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Jul;54(7):1902-1903. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00084-16. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
8
Feasibility and Performance of Self-Collected Nasal Swabs for Detection of Influenza Virus, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, and Human Metapneumovirus.自采鼻拭子检测流感病毒、呼吸道合胞病毒和人类偏肺病毒的可行性和性能。
J Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 1;224(5):831-838. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab023.
9
Comparison of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV Assay to in-house Flu/RSV triplex real-time RT-PCR for rapid molecular detection of Influenza A, Influenza B and Respiratory Syncytial Virus in respiratory specimens.比较 Cepheid Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV 检测与实验室自建 Flu/RSV 三重实时 RT-PCR 快速分子检测呼吸道标本中甲型流感、乙型流感和呼吸道合胞病毒。
J Med Microbiol. 2018 Nov;67(11):1576-1580. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000841. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
Accuracy and Discomfort of Different Types of Intranasal Specimen Collection Methods for Molecular Influenza Testing in Emergency Department Patients.不同类型的鼻腔标本采集方法用于急诊科患者分子流感检测的准确性和不适感。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;71(4):509-517.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Expert consensus on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infections in children.儿童呼吸道合胞病毒感染诊断、治疗和预防专家共识。
World J Pediatr. 2024 Jan;20(1):11-25. doi: 10.1007/s12519-023-00777-9. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
2
Recommendations for respiratory syncytial virus surveillance at the national level.国家层面呼吸道合胞病毒监测建议。
Eur Respir J. 2021 Oct 1;58(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.03766-2020. Print 2021 Sep.
3
Comparison of detection rate of 16 sampling methods for respiratory viruses: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of clinical data and systematic review.
16 种呼吸道病毒采样方法检测率的比较:基于临床数据的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析和系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov;5(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003053.