• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄相关的互惠和单边亲社会行为判断差异。

Age-related differences in judgments of reciprocal and unilateral prosocial behaviors.

机构信息

Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.

Faculty of Education, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Apr;180:69-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.009. Epub 2019 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.009
PMID:30639769
Abstract

We examined age-related differences in evaluating reciprocal prosocial behavior (e.g., helping someone who has helped you) and unilateral prosocial behavior (e.g., helping someone who has previously refused your request for help). Participants were kindergarteners, second and fifth graders, and undergraduate students (N = 110). We examined the trait evaluations of reciprocal and unilateral prosocial protagonists, behavior predictions of the participants in reciprocal and unilateral situations, and behavior predictions of others (including reciprocal and unilateral protagonists and others known to the participants) in reciprocal and unilateral prosocial situations. Results revealed that most kindergarteners did not focus on whether help was reciprocal or unilateral, and there were no clear differences in trait evaluations or predicted reciprocal or unilateral prosocial behaviors. In contrast, older children and undergraduates tended to focus on the difference between reciprocal and unilateral help. They evaluated unilateral protagonists more positively than reciprocal protagonists, and they judged the likelihood that others would engage in unilateral prosocial behaviors as lower than the likelihood that they would engage in reciprocal behaviors. However, most participants, regardless of age, predicted that they themselves would act prosocially in both reciprocal and unilateral situations. We discuss how the current results have implications for research on age-related trends in evaluating reciprocity and morality.

摘要

我们考察了年龄相关差异在评估互惠亲社会行为(例如,帮助曾经帮助过你的人)和单边亲社会行为(例如,帮助之前拒绝过你帮助请求的人)中的作用。参与者包括幼儿园儿童、二年级和五年级学生以及大学生(N=110)。我们考察了互惠和单边亲社会主角的特质评估、参与者在互惠和单边情境中的行为预测,以及在互惠和单边亲社会情境中他人(包括互惠和单边主角以及参与者认识的其他人)的行为预测。结果表明,大多数幼儿园儿童并不关注帮助是互惠的还是单边的,在特质评估或预测互惠或单边亲社会行为方面没有明显差异。相比之下,年龄较大的儿童和大学生往往更关注互惠和单边帮助之间的差异。他们更积极地评价单边主角,认为他人更有可能表现出单边亲社会行为,而不是互惠行为。然而,大多数参与者,无论年龄大小,都预测自己在互惠和单边情境中都会表现出亲社会行为。我们讨论了当前的结果如何对评估互惠性和道德的年龄相关趋势的研究产生影响。

相似文献

1
Age-related differences in judgments of reciprocal and unilateral prosocial behaviors.年龄相关的互惠和单边亲社会行为判断差异。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Apr;180:69-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.009. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
2
What Accounts for Prosocial Behavior? Roles of Moral Identity, Moral Judgment, and Self-Efficacy Beliefs.亲社会行为的成因是什么?道德认同、道德判断和自我效能信念的作用。
J Genet Psychol. 2018 Sep-Oct;179(5):231-245. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2018.1491472. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
3
From being nice to being kind: development of prosocial behaviors.从友善到善良:亲社会行为的发展。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Apr;20:45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.036. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
4
[The influence of prosocial behaviors on evaluations of morality and warmth].[亲社会行为对道德与温暖感评价的影响]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2017 Feb;87(6):590-9. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.87.15045.
5
Learning how to help others: two-year-olds' social learning of a prosocial act.学习如何帮助他人:两岁儿童对亲社会行为的社会学习。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Apr;114(4):543-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 25.
6
Defend, Stand By, or Join In?: The Relative Influence of Moral Identity, Moral Judgment, and Social Self-Efficacy on Adolescents' Bystander Behaviors in Bullying Situations.捍卫、旁观还是参与?:道德认同、道德判断和社会自我效能感对青少年在欺凌情境中旁观者行为的相对影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Oct;48(10):2051-2064. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01089-w. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
7
Behavioral and sociocognitive correlates of ratings of prosocial behavior and sociometric status.亲社会行为评分与社会测量地位的行为及社会认知相关因素
J Genet Psychol. 1988 Mar;149(1):5-15. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1988.10532133.
8
Is extraordinary prosocial behavior more valuable than ordinary prosocial behavior?非凡的亲社会行为比普通的亲社会行为更有价值吗?
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 23;13(4):e0196340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196340. eCollection 2018.
9
Cheating in the name of others: Offering prosocial justifications promotes unethical behavior in young children.假借他人之名行骗:为亲社会行为提供合理借口会助长幼儿的不道德行为。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Jan;177:187-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
10
Early life stress moderates the relationship between age and prosocial behaviors.早期生活压力调节了年龄与亲社会行为之间的关系。
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Aug;94:104029. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104029. Epub 2019 Jun 14.