• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

果蝇翅膀的局部变形和刚度分布。

Local deformation and stiffness distribution in fly wings.

作者信息

Wehmann Henja-Niniane, Heepe Lars, Gorb Stanislav N, Engels Thomas, Lehmann Fritz-Olaf

机构信息

Department of Animal Physiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Str. 3, Rostock 18059, Germany.

Department of Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological Institute, University of Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-Platz, 24118 Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

Biol Open. 2019 Jan 14;8(1):bio038299. doi: 10.1242/bio.038299.

DOI:10.1242/bio.038299
PMID:30642916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6361194/
Abstract

Mechanical properties of insect wings are essential for insect flight aerodynamics. During wing flapping, wings may undergo tremendous deformations, depending on the wings' spatial stiffness distribution. We here show an experimental evaluation of wing stiffness in three species of flies using a micro-force probe and an imaging method for wing surface reconstruction. Vertical deflection in response to point loads at 11 characteristic points on the wing surface reveals that average spring stiffness of bending lines between wing hinge and point loads varies ∼77-fold in small fruit flies and up to ∼28-fold in large blowflies. The latter result suggests that local wing deformation depends to a considerable degree on how inertial and aerodynamic forces are distributed on the wing surface during wing flapping. Stiffness increases with an increasing body mass, amounting to ∼0.6 Nm in fruit flies, ∼0.7 Nm in house flies and ∼2.6 Nm in blowflies for bending lines, running from the wing base to areas near the center of aerodynamic pressure. Wings of house flies have a ∼1.4-fold anisotropy in mean stiffness for ventral versus dorsal loading, while anisotropy is absent in fruit flies and blowflies. We present two numerical methods for calculation of local surface deformation based on surface symmetry and wing curvature. These data demonstrate spatial deformation patterns under load and highlight how veins subdivide wings into functional areas. Our results on wings of living animals differ from previous experiments on detached, desiccated wings and help to construct more realistic mechanical models for testing the aerodynamic consequences of specific wing deformations.

摘要

昆虫翅膀的力学特性对于昆虫飞行空气动力学至关重要。在翅膀扇动过程中,翅膀可能会发生巨大变形,这取决于翅膀的空间刚度分布。我们在此展示了使用微力探针和用于翅膀表面重建的成像方法对三种苍蝇翅膀刚度进行的实验评估。对翅膀表面11个特征点处的点载荷做出响应的垂直挠度表明,在小型果蝇中,翅膀铰链与点载荷之间弯曲线的平均弹簧刚度变化约77倍,在大型丽蝇中变化高达约28倍。后一结果表明,局部翅膀变形在很大程度上取决于翅膀扇动过程中惯性力和空气动力在翅膀表面的分布方式。刚度随着体重增加而增大,对于从翅膀基部延伸至空气动力压力中心附近区域的弯曲线而言,果蝇中的刚度约为0.6 Nm,家蝇中约为0.7 Nm,丽蝇中约为2.6 Nm。家蝇翅膀在腹侧与背侧加载时的平均刚度具有约1.4倍的各向异性,而果蝇和丽蝇中不存在各向异性。我们提出了两种基于表面对称性和翅膀曲率计算局部表面变形的数值方法。这些数据展示了负载下的空间变形模式,并突出了翅脉如何将翅膀细分为功能区域。我们对活体动物翅膀的研究结果与之前对分离、干燥翅膀的实验不同,有助于构建更现实的力学模型,以测试特定翅膀变形的空气动力学后果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/c597dc621856/biolopen-8-038299-g11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/888b94d7ee2b/biolopen-8-038299-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/9c1687fbaa0c/biolopen-8-038299-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/57cd4bb3cede/biolopen-8-038299-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/8214e9c430e4/biolopen-8-038299-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/20a6fa6061df/biolopen-8-038299-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/aa03766773a8/biolopen-8-038299-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/bebcbebc6b95/biolopen-8-038299-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/8acfdd130637/biolopen-8-038299-g8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/501c644dd212/biolopen-8-038299-g9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/3a1a3ad2d2ee/biolopen-8-038299-g10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/c597dc621856/biolopen-8-038299-g11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/888b94d7ee2b/biolopen-8-038299-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/9c1687fbaa0c/biolopen-8-038299-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/57cd4bb3cede/biolopen-8-038299-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/8214e9c430e4/biolopen-8-038299-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/20a6fa6061df/biolopen-8-038299-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/aa03766773a8/biolopen-8-038299-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/bebcbebc6b95/biolopen-8-038299-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/8acfdd130637/biolopen-8-038299-g8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/501c644dd212/biolopen-8-038299-g9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/3a1a3ad2d2ee/biolopen-8-038299-g10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c995/6361194/c597dc621856/biolopen-8-038299-g11.jpg

相似文献

1
Local deformation and stiffness distribution in fly wings.果蝇翅膀的局部变形和刚度分布。
Biol Open. 2019 Jan 14;8(1):bio038299. doi: 10.1242/bio.038299.
2
Elastic deformation and energy loss of flapping fly wings.扑翼飞行中翅膀的弹性变形和能量损耗。
J Exp Biol. 2011 Sep 1;214(Pt 17):2949-61. doi: 10.1242/jeb.045351.
3
Aerodynamic performance of two-dimensional, chordwise flexible flapping wings at fruit fly scale in hover flight.二维弦向柔性扑翼在果蝇尺度下悬停飞行时的空气动力学性能。
Bioinspir Biomim. 2015 May 6;10(3):036007. doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/10/3/036007.
4
Flexural stiffness in insect wings. II. Spatial distribution and dynamic wing bending.昆虫翅膀的抗弯刚度。II. 空间分布与翅膀动态弯曲
J Exp Biol. 2003 Sep;206(Pt 17):2989-97. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00524.
5
Wing deformation improves aerodynamic performance of forward flight of bluebottle flies flying in a flight mill.翅膀变形提高了在飞行笼中飞行的蓝瓶蝇的前飞空气动力性能。
J R Soc Interface. 2024 Jul;21(216):20240076. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0076. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
6
Structural dynamics and aerodynamics measurements of biologically inspired flexible flapping wings.生物启发式柔性扑翼的结构动力学和空气动力学测量。
Bioinspir Biomim. 2011 Mar;6(1):016009. doi: 10.1088/1748-3182/6/1/016009. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
7
Into thin air: Contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta.消失于稀薄空气中:气动力和惯性弹力对烟草天蛾翅膀弯曲的作用
J Exp Biol. 2003 Sep;206(Pt 17):2999-3006. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00502.
8
Three-dimensional wing structure attenuates aerodynamic efficiency in flapping fly wings.三维翼结构会降低扑翼飞行中的空气动力学效率。
J R Soc Interface. 2020 Mar;17(164):20190804. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0804. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
9
Effect of chordwise wing flexibility on flapping flight of a butterfly model using immersed-boundary lattice Boltzmann simulations.翼弦向柔性对基于浸入边界格子玻尔兹曼方法模拟的蝴蝶扑翼飞行的影响。
Phys Rev E. 2019 Jul;100(1-1):013104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.100.013104.
10
An experimental comparative study of the efficiency of twisted and flat flapping wings during hovering flight.悬停飞行过程中扭曲翼和平直扑翼效率的实验对比研究。
Bioinspir Biomim. 2017 Apr 19;12(3):036009. doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/aa65e6.

引用本文的文献

1
A hull reconstruction-reprojection method for pose estimation of free-flying fruit flies.自由飞行果蝇位姿估计的船体重建-重投影方法。
J Exp Biol. 2023 Nov 1;226(21). doi: 10.1242/jeb.245853. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
2
Model-Based Tracking of Fruit Flies in Free Flight.基于模型的果蝇自由飞行跟踪
Insects. 2022 Nov 3;13(11):1018. doi: 10.3390/insects13111018.
3
Physical intelligence as a new paradigm.身体智能作为一种新范式。

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement of shape and deformation of insect wing.昆虫翅膀形状和变形的测量。
Rev Sci Instrum. 2018 Jan;89(1):014301. doi: 10.1063/1.5019200.
2
Effects of flexibility and aspect ratio on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings.扑翼气动性能的灵活性和纵横比的影响。
Bioinspir Biomim. 2018 Mar 14;13(3):036001. doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/aaaac1.
3
Slow viscoelastic response of resilin.弹性蛋白的缓慢粘弹性响应。
Extreme Mech Lett. 2021 Apr 26;46:101340. eCollection 2021 Jul 30.
4
Wing Design in Flies: Properties and Aerodynamic Function.果蝇翅膀的设计:特性与空气动力学功能
Insects. 2020 Jul 23;11(8):466. doi: 10.3390/insects11080466.
5
Morphological diversification has led to inter-specific variation in elastic wing deformation during flight in scarab beetles.形态多样性导致了金龟子在飞行过程中弹性翅膀变形的种间差异。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Apr 15;7(4):200277. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200277. eCollection 2020 Apr.
6
Three-dimensional wing structure attenuates aerodynamic efficiency in flapping fly wings.三维翼结构会降低扑翼飞行中的空气动力学效率。
J R Soc Interface. 2020 Mar;17(164):20190804. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0804. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2018 Apr;204(4):409-417. doi: 10.1007/s00359-018-1248-2. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
4
Artificial Manduca sexta forewings for flapping-wing micro aerial vehicles: how wing structure affects performance.用于扑翼微型飞行器的人工摩蚊前翅:机翼结构如何影响性能。
Bioinspir Biomim. 2017 Sep 26;12(5):055003. doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/aa7ea3.
5
Investigation of span-chordwise bending anisotropy of honeybee forewings.蜜蜂前翅展向-弦向弯曲各向异性的研究
Biol Open. 2017 May 15;6(5):619-624. doi: 10.1242/bio.022541.
6
Environment-specific modulation of odorant representations in the honeybee brain.蜜蜂大脑中气味表征的环境特异性调节。
Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Dec;44(12):3080-3093. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13438. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
7
Wing flexibility improves bumblebee flight stability.翅膀的灵活性可提高大黄蜂飞行的稳定性。
J Exp Biol. 2016 Nov 1;219(Pt 21):3384-3390. doi: 10.1242/jeb.133157. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
8
Effect of microstructure on the mechanical and damping behaviour of dragonfly wing veins.微观结构对蜻蜓翅脉的力学和阻尼性能的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Feb 17;3(2):160006. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160006. eCollection 2016 Feb.
9
Ultrastructure of dragonfly wing veins: composite structure of fibrous material supplemented by resilin.蜻蜓翅脉的超微结构:由弹性蛋白补充的纤维材料复合结构。
J Anat. 2015 Oct;227(4):561-82. doi: 10.1111/joa.12362.
10
A comparative study of the effects of vein-joints on the mechanical behaviour of insect wings: I. Single joints.翅脉关节对昆虫翅膀力学行为影响的比较研究:I. 单个关节
Bioinspir Biomim. 2015 Aug 20;10(5):056003. doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/10/5/056003.