• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分娩教育对未来医疗保健决策的感知益处。

Perceived Benefits of Childbirth Education on Future Health-Care Decision Making.

作者信息

Leach Jane, Bowles Betty, Jansen Lauren, Gibson Martha

出版信息

J Perinat Educ. 2017;26(1):49-56. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.26.1.49.

DOI:10.1891/1058-1243.26.1.49
PMID:30643377
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6314322/
Abstract

The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the perception of women regarding long-term effects of childbirth education on future health-care decision making. This qualitative study used a purposive sample of 10 women who participated in facilitated focus groups. Analysis of focus group narratives provided themes in order of prevalence: (a) self-advocacy, (b) new skills, (c) anticipatory guidance, (d) control, (e) informed consent, and (f) trust. This small exploratory study does not answer the question of whether childbirth education influences future health-care decision making, but it demonstrates that the themes and issues from participants who delivered 15-30 years ago were comparable to current findings in the literature.

摘要

这项定性研究的目的是探讨女性对分娩教育对未来医疗保健决策的长期影响的看法。这项定性研究采用了有目的抽样,选取了10名参与焦点小组讨论的女性。对焦点小组讨论记录的分析得出了按出现频率排序的主题:(a)自我主张,(b)新技能,(c)预期指导,(d)控制,(e)知情同意,以及(f)信任。这项小型探索性研究并未回答分娩教育是否会影响未来医疗保健决策这一问题,但它表明,15至30年前分娩的参与者提出的主题和问题与当前文献中的研究结果相当。

相似文献

1
Perceived Benefits of Childbirth Education on Future Health-Care Decision Making.分娩教育对未来医疗保健决策的感知益处。
J Perinat Educ. 2017;26(1):49-56. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.26.1.49.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
3
4
Decision Making about Hospital Arrival among Low-Risk Nulliparous Women after Spontaneous Labor Onset at Home.低危初产妇在家中自发临产时的入院决策。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jul;63(4):455-461. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12741. Epub 2018 May 15.
5
Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.关于采用预测试教育方法以增强BRCA1基因检测知情决策的对照试验。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Jan 15;89(2):148-57. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.2.148.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
The challenges for nurses communicating with and gaining valid consent from adults with intellectual disabilities within the accident and emergency care service.护士在事故与急救护理服务中与成年智障患者沟通并获得有效同意所面临的挑战。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Sep;16(9):1678-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01642.x. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
8
Capacity and consent: Knowledge and practice of legal and healthcare standards.能力与同意:法律和医疗标准的知识与实践。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Feb;26(1):71-83. doi: 10.1177/0969733016687162. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
9
At pains to consent: A narrative inquiry into women's attempts of natural childbirth.努力争取同意:对女性自然分娩尝试的叙事探究
Women Birth. 2016 Aug;29(4):310-20. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
10
"As Long as You Ask": A Qualitative Study of Biobanking Consent-Oncology Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Attitudes, Motivations, and Experiences-the B-PPAE Study.“只要你问”:一项关于生物库同意的定性研究——肿瘤患者和医疗保健专业人员的态度、动机和经验——B-PPAE 研究。
Oncologist. 2019 Jun;24(6):844-856. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0233. Epub 2018 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Holistic antenatal education class interventions: a systematic review of the prioritisation and involvement of Indigenous Peoples' of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States over a 10-year period 2008 to 2018.整体产前教育课程干预措施:对2008年至2018年这10年间新西兰奥特亚罗瓦、澳大利亚、加拿大和美国原住民的优先事项和参与情况的系统评价
Arch Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;80(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00927-x.

本文引用的文献

1
First do no harm: interventions during childbirth.首先,不要造成伤害:分娩期间的干预措施。
J Perinat Educ. 2013 Spring;22(2):83-92. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.22.2.83.
2
Continuing education module top 10: tips on teaching lamaze classes.继续教育模块十大要点:拉玛泽分娩法课程教学小贴士
J Perinat Educ. 2012 Fall;21(4):248-52. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.21.4.248.
3
The Impact of Choice and Control on Women's Childbirth Experiences.选择与控制权对女性分娩体验的影响。
J Perinat Educ. 2012 Summer;21(3):158-68. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.21.3.158.
4
Steps toward innovative childbirth education: selected strategies from the blueprint for action.迈向创新分娩教育的步骤:行动蓝图中的选定策略
J Perinat Educ. 2010 Summer;19(3):17-20. doi: 10.1624/105812410X514422.
5
Blueprint for action: steps toward a high-quality, high-value maternity care system.行动计划:迈向高质量、高价值的孕产妇保健体系。
Womens Health Issues. 2010 Jan-Feb;20(1 Suppl):S18-49. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2009.11.007.
6
Listening to Mothers II: Report of the Second National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences: Conducted January-February 2006 for Childbirth Connection by Harris Interactive(R) in partnership with Lamaze International.倾听母亲II:美国第二次全国妇女生育经历调查的报告:2006年1月至2月由哈里斯互动公司(Harris Interactive®)与拉梅兹国际(Lamaze International)合作,为分娩连接组织开展。
J Perinat Educ. 2007 Fall;16(4):9-14. doi: 10.1624/105812407X244769.
7
Birth plans: the good, the bad, and the future.分娩计划:优点、缺点与未来。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Mar-Apr;35(2):295-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00042.x.