Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;20(1):58-63. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.10.39843. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
During residency, the faculty's role is to provide supervision while granting the trainee autonomy. This concept is termed entrustment. The goal is appropriate progression from supervision to autonomy while decreasing oversight as residents train. The objective of this study was to better understand the factors affecting the degree of autonomy or supervision faculty choose to provide residents.
This was a qualitative study of resident and faculty perceptions. We conducted two faculty and two resident focus groups. We then transcribed the transcripts of the audiotaped discussions and coded them using grounded theory.
Analysis of the transcripts yielded four major factors affecting entrustment of residents.Patient Factors included the acuity of the patient, sociomedical issues of patient/family, and complexity of risk with patient or procedure. For example, "sometimes there are families and patients who are exceedingly difficult that immediately sort of force me [to allow less autonomy]." included patient volume and systems protocols (i.e., trauma). "If you're very busy and you have a resident that you already trust, you will give them more rope because you're trying to juggle more balls." included the year of training, resident performance, clinical direct observation, and patient presentations. "But if you have a resident that you do not trust […] I tell them you're going to do this, this, this, this, this." included confidence in his/her own practice, risk-averse attitude, degree of ownership of the patient, commitment to education, and personality (e.g., micro-manager). Significant variability in entrustment by faculty existed, from being "micromanagers" to not seeing the patients. One resident noted: "There are some attendings, no matter how much they like you and how much you've worked with them, they're always going to be in your face in the trauma bay. And there's some attendings that are going to be ghosts."
Multiple factors affect the amount of autonomy and entrustment given to residents and their level of supervision by faculty, leading to wide variability in entrustment. In the end, regardless of resident, patient, or environment, some faculty are more likely to entrust than others.
住院医师培训期间,带教老师的职责是在赋予住院医师自主权的同时提供监督。这一概念被称为委托。目标是在住院医师培训过程中,从监督到自主的适当进展,同时减少监督。本研究的目的是更好地理解影响带教老师选择给予住院医师自主权或监督程度的因素。
这是一项对住院医师和带教老师认知的定性研究。我们进行了两次带教老师和两次住院医师焦点小组讨论。然后,我们将录音讨论的文字记录转录并使用扎根理论进行编码。
对文字记录的分析产生了影响委托住院医师的四个主要因素。患者因素包括患者的病情严重程度、患者/家庭的社会医学问题以及患者或手术的风险复杂性。例如,“有时会遇到非常困难的家庭和患者,这立即迫使我[允许减少自主权]。”包括患者数量和系统方案(即创伤)。“如果您很忙,并且已经信任某个住院医师,那么您会给他们更多的自主权,因为您试图处理更多的事情。”包括培训年限、住院医师表现、临床直接观察和患者陈述。“但是,如果您不信任某个住院医师[...]我会告诉他们您将做这个,这个,这个,这个,这个。”包括对自己实践的信心、规避风险的态度、对患者的所有权程度、对教育的承诺和个性(例如,微观管理者)。带教老师在委托方面存在显著的变异性,从“微观管理者”到不看患者。一位住院医师指出:“有些主治医生,无论他们多么喜欢你,无论你与他们合作了多久,他们在创伤病房里总是会盯着你。而有些主治医生则像幽灵一样。”
多种因素会影响给予住院医师的自主权和委托程度,以及带教老师的监督水平,从而导致委托的广泛变异性。最终,无论患者、环境如何,有些带教老师比其他带教老师更有可能委托。