Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia.
University of Malaya Primary Care Research Group, Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Singapore Med J. 2019 Nov;60(11):596-604. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019011. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) was the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide in 2008 (1.23 million cases, 9.7%). CRC screening was shown to be effective in reducing 70% of CRC mortality. However, the screening rate for CRC remains poor.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among primary care physicians (PCPs) in public primary care clinics in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. A 30-item self-administered questionnaire was used to assess the knowledge and practice of CRC screening.
The response rate was 86.4% (n = 197/228). Less than half (39.1%) of the respondents answered correctly for all risk stratification scenarios. Mean knowledge score on CRC screening modalities was 48.7% ± 17.7%. The knowledge score was positively associated with having postgraduate educational qualification and usage of screening guidelines. Overall, 69.9% of PCPs reported that they practised screening. However, of these, only 25.9% of PCPs screened over 50% of all eligible patients. PCPs who agreed that screening was cost-effective (odds ratio [OR] 3.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69‒6.59) and those who agreed that they had adequate resources in their locality (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.01‒3.68) were more likely to practise screening. Knowledge score was not associated with the practice of screening (p = 0.185).
Knowledge and practice of CRC screening was inadequate among PCPs. Knowledge of screening did not translate into its practice. PCPs' perceptions about cost-effectiveness of screening and adequate resources were important determinants of the practice of screening.
2008 年,结直肠癌(CRC)是全球第三大常见癌症(123 万例,9.7%)。CRC 筛查被证明可有效降低 70%的 CRC 死亡率。然而,CRC 的筛查率仍然很低。
在马来西亚吉隆坡的公立初级保健诊所,对初级保健医生(PCP)进行了横断面调查。使用 30 项自我管理问卷评估 CRC 筛查的知识和实践情况。
应答率为 86.4%(n=197/228)。不到一半(39.1%)的受访者对所有风险分层场景的回答均正确。CRC 筛查方法的知识得分平均为 48.7%±17.7%。知识得分与具有研究生教育资格和使用筛查指南呈正相关。总体而言,69.9%的 PCP 报告他们进行了筛查。然而,在这些医生中,只有 25.9%的医生对所有符合条件的患者进行了超过 50%的筛查。认为筛查具有成本效益的 PCP(比值比 [OR] 3.34,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.69‒6.59)和认为他们在当地有足够资源的 PCP(OR 1.92,95%CI 1.01‒3.68)更有可能进行筛查。知识得分与筛查实践无关(p=0.185)。
PCP 对 CRC 筛查的知识和实践不足。对筛查的了解并未转化为实际操作。PCP 对筛查的成本效益和足够资源的看法是筛查实践的重要决定因素。