From the Departments of Medical Physics (M.G.W., Y.L., T.P.S., C.A.M.), Radiology (J.L.H., T.P.S., P.L., C.A.M., F.T.L.), Urology (J.L.H., F.T.L.), and Biomedical Engineering (T.P.S., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53705.
Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):241-249. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181362. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
Purpose To determine the feasibility of ultra-low-dose (ULD) CT fluoroscopy for performing percutaneous CT-guided interventions in an in vivo porcine model and to compare radiation dose, spatial accuracy, and metal artifact for conventional CT versus CT fluoroscopy. Materials and Methods An in vivo swine model was used (n = 4, ∼50 kg) for 20 procedures guided by 246 incremental conventional CT scans (mean, 12.5 scans per procedure). The procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and performed by two experienced radiologists from September 7, 2017, to August 8, 2018. ULD CT fluoroscopic acquisitions were simulated by using only two of 984 conventional CT projections to locate and reconstruct the needle, which was superimposed on a previously acquired and motion-compensated CT scan. The authors (medical physicists) compared the ULD CT fluoroscopy results to those of conventional CT for needle location, radiation dose, and metal artifacts using Deming regression and generalized mixed models. Results The average distance between the needle tip reconstructed using conventional CT and ULD CT fluoroscopy was 1.06 mm. Compared with CT fluoroscopy, the estimated dose for a percutaneous procedure, including planning acquisitions, was 0.99 mSv (21% reduction) for patients (effective dose) and 0.015 µGy (97% reduction) for physicians (scattered dose in air). Metal artifacts were statistically significantly reduced (P < .001, bootstrapping), and the average registration error of the motion compensation was within 1-3 mm. Conclusion Ultra-low-dose CT fluoroscopy has the potential to reduce radiation exposure for intraprocedural scans to patients and staff by a factor of approximately 500 times compared with conventional CT acquisition, while maintaining image quality without metal artifacts. © RSNA, 2019.
在活体猪模型中,确定超低剂量(ULD)CT 透视用于进行经皮 CT 引导介入的可行性,并比较常规 CT 与 CT 透视的辐射剂量、空间精度和金属伪影。
使用活体猪模型(n=4,体重约 50kg)进行 20 次介入,由 246 次递增常规 CT 扫描(每次介入平均扫描 12.5 次)引导。该研究经机构动物护理和使用委员会批准,由 2017 年 9 月 7 日至 2018 年 8 月 8 日期间两位经验丰富的放射科医生进行。使用仅 984 次常规 CT 投影中的两次来定位和重建针,然后将其叠加在之前获取并进行运动补偿的 CT 扫描上,模拟 ULD CT 透视采集。作者(医学物理学家)使用 Deming 回归和广义混合模型比较 ULD CT 透视与常规 CT 对针定位、辐射剂量和金属伪影的结果。
使用常规 CT 和 ULD CT 透视重建的针尖平均距离为 1.06mm。与 CT 透视相比,包括计划采集在内的经皮介入程序的估计剂量,对于患者(有效剂量)为 0.99mSv(降低 21%),对于医生(空气中散射剂量)为 0.015µGy(降低 97%)。金属伪影显著降低(P<0.001,自举法),运动补偿的平均配准误差在 1-3mm 范围内。
与常规 CT 采集相比,ULD CT 透视有可能将患者和工作人员的术中扫描辐射暴露降低约 500 倍,同时保持无金属伪影的图像质量。