Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182533. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2533.
Positive psychological interventions for improving health have received increasing attention recently. Evidence on the impact of such interventions on pain, and racial disparities in pain, is limited.
To assess the effects of a positive psychological intervention on pain and functional difficulty in veterans with knee osteoarthritis.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Staying Positive With Arthritis Study is a large, double-blinded randomized clinical trial powered to detect race differences in self-reported pain in response to a positive psychological intervention compared with a neutral control intervention. Data were collected from 2 urban Veterans Affairs medical centers. Participants included non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic African American patients aged 50 years or older with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Mailings were sent to 5111 patients meeting these criteria, of whom 839 were fully screened, 488 were eligible, and 360 were randomized. Enrollment lasted from July 8, 2015, to February 1, 2017, with follow-up through September 6, 2017.
The intervention comprised a 6-week series of evidence-based activities to build positive psychological skills (eg, gratitude and kindness). The control program comprised similarly structured neutral activities. Programs were delivered via workbook and weekly telephone calls with interventionists.
The primary outcomes were self-reported pain and functional difficulty measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC; range 0-100). Secondary outcomes included affect balance and life satisfaction.
The sample included 180 non-Hispanic white patients and 180 non-Hispanic African American patients (mean [SD] age, 64.2 [8.8] years; 76.4% were male). Mean (SD) baseline scores for WOMAC pain and functional difficulty were 48.8 (17.6) and 46.8 (18.1), respectively. Although both decreased significantly over time (pain: χ23 = 49.50, P < .001; functional difficulty: χ23 = 22.11, P < .001), differences were small and did not vary by treatment group or race. Exploratory analyses suggested that the intervention had counterintuitive effects on secondary outcomes.
The results of this randomized clinical trial do not support the use of positive psychological interventions as a stand-alone treatment for pain among white or African American veterans with knee osteoarthritis. Adaptations are needed to identify intervention components that resonate with this population, and the additive effect of incorporating positive psychological interventions into more comprehensive pain treatment regimens should be considered.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02223858.
最近,改善健康的积极心理干预措施受到了越来越多的关注。关于此类干预措施对疼痛的影响,以及疼痛方面的种族差异的证据有限。
评估积极心理干预对膝骨关节炎退伍军人疼痛和功能障碍的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:与关节炎保持积极态度研究是一项大型的、双盲随机临床试验,其目的是检测与中性对照干预相比,积极心理干预对自报疼痛的种族差异。数据来自 2 家城市退伍军人事务医疗中心。参与者包括年龄在 50 岁或以上、被诊断为骨关节炎的非西班牙裔白人和非西班牙裔非裔美国人。向符合这些标准的 5111 名患者发送了邮件,其中 839 名患者接受了全面筛查,488 名患者符合条件,360 名患者被随机分配。招募工作于 2015 年 7 月 8 日至 2017 年 2 月 1 日进行,随访至 2017 年 9 月 6 日。
干预措施包括一系列基于证据的活动,以建立积极的心理技能(例如,感恩和善良)。控制方案包括结构相同的中性活动。通过工作簿和每周与干预者的电话提供方案。
主要结果是使用西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC;范围 0-100)测量的自报疼痛和功能障碍。次要结果包括情感平衡和生活满意度。
样本包括 180 名非西班牙裔白人和 180 名非西班牙裔非裔美国人(平均[标准差]年龄 64.2[8.8]岁;76.4%为男性)。WOMAC 疼痛和功能障碍的基线平均(标准差)评分分别为 48.8(17.6)和 46.8(18.1)。尽管两者都随着时间的推移显著下降(疼痛:χ23=49.50,P<0.001;功能障碍:χ23=22.11,P<0.001),但差异较小,且不受治疗组或种族的影响。探索性分析表明,干预对次要结果产生了意想不到的影响。
这项随机临床试验的结果不支持将积极的心理干预作为白人或非裔美国退伍军人膝骨关节炎疼痛的单一治疗方法。需要进行调整,以确定与该人群产生共鸣的干预措施,并且应考虑将积极的心理干预纳入更全面的疼痛治疗方案中以增加效果。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02223858。