1 Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism Center Hospital National Center for Global Health and Medicine Tokyo Japan.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jan 22;8(2):e011207. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011207.
Background This study aimed to assess whether the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1/tissue plasminogen activator ( PAI -1/ tPA ) ratio as a prothrombotic state is useful for optimizing cardiac treatment strategy. Methods and Results Using BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes) trial data, we used a Cox proportional hazard model to calculate hazard ratios with 95% CI s for cardiac events in patients receiving early revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting) or medical therapy, separately in patients with low (n=1276) and high (n=894) PAI -1/ tPA ratios. The primary outcome was major cardiac events, which was a composite end point including cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. The mean± SD follow-up period was 4.1±1.7 years. The risk of major cardiac events in patients with high PAI -1/ tPA ratio was significantly higher when receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI , 1.16-2.93; P=0.01) than when receiving medical therapy, whereas that in patients with low PAI -1/ tPA ratio did not differ significantly between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI , 0.66-1.36; P=0.77); the interaction between the cardiac treatment strategy and PAI -1/ tPA ratio was significant ( P=0.02). However, regardless of the PAI -1/ tPA ratio, major cardiac event risk seemed to be lower in patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafting than in those receiving medical therapy. Conclusions In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease, this study demonstrated that those with high PAI -1/ tPA ratio were at higher risks of major cardiac events when treated with percutaneous coronary intervention than when treated with intensive medical therapy.
背景 本研究旨在评估纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1/组织型纤溶酶原激活物(PAI-1/tPA)比值作为促血栓状态是否有助于优化心脏治疗策略。
方法和结果 利用 BARI 2D(旁路血管成形术血运重建治疗 2 型糖尿病)试验数据,我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型分别计算接受早期血运重建(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术)或药物治疗的患者中,低(n=1276)和高(n=894)PAI-1/tPA 比值患者的心脏事件风险比及其 95%CI。主要终点是主要心脏不良事件,这是包括心源性死亡和非致死性心肌梗死的复合终点。平均随访时间为 4.1±1.7 年。高 PAI-1/tPA 比值患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时发生主要心脏不良事件的风险明显高于接受药物治疗时(风险比,1.84;95%CI,1.16-2.93;P=0.01),而低 PAI-1/tPA 比值患者在两组之间差异无统计学意义(风险比,0.95;95%CI,0.66-1.36;P=0.77);心脏治疗策略和 PAI-1/tPA 比值之间的交互作用具有统计学意义(P=0.02)。然而,无论 PAI-1/tPA 比值如何,接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者主要心脏不良事件风险似乎低于接受药物治疗的患者。
结论 在患有 2 型糖尿病和冠状动脉疾病的患者中,本研究表明,与接受强化药物治疗相比,接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中 PAI-1/tPA 比值较高的患者发生主要心脏不良事件的风险更高。