Department of Psychology, Multimodal Imaging and Cognitive Control Lab, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Sleep. 2019 Apr 1;42(4). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsz016.
Although sleep deprivation has long been known to negatively affect cognitive performance, the exact mechanisms through which it acts and what cognitive domains are affected most is still disputed. The current study provides a theory-driven approach to examine and explain the detrimental effects of sleep loss with a focus on attention and cognitive control.
Twenty-four participants (12 females; age: 24 ± 3 years) completed the experiment that involved laboratory-controlled over-night sleep deprivation and two control conditions, namely, a normally rested night at home and a night of sleep in the laboratory. Using a stop signal task in combination with electroencephalographic recordings, we dissociated different processes contributing to task performance such as sustained attention, automatic or bottom-up processing, and strategic or top-down control. At the behavioral level, we extracted reaction times, response accuracy, and markers of behavioral adjustments (post-error and post-stop slowing), whereas at the neural level event-related potentials (ERP) found in context of response inhibition (N2/P3) and error monitoring (ERN/Pe) were obtained.
It was found that 24 hr of sleep deprivation resulted in declined sustained attention and reduced P300 and Pe amplitudes, demonstrating a gradual breakdown of top-down control. In contrast, N200 and ERN as well as the stop-signal reaction time showed higher resilience to sleep loss signifying the role of automatic processing.
These results support the notion that sleep deprivation is more detrimental to cognitive functions that are relatively more dependent on mental effort and/or cognitive capacity, as opposed to more automatic control processes.
尽管睡眠剥夺长期以来一直被认为会对认知表现产生负面影响,但它的作用机制以及受影响最大的认知领域仍存在争议。本研究提供了一种理论驱动的方法来检查和解释睡眠剥夺的有害影响,重点关注注意力和认知控制。
24 名参与者(12 名女性;年龄:24 ± 3 岁)完成了实验,该实验涉及实验室控制的通宵睡眠剥夺和两种对照条件,即在家中正常休息的夜晚和在实验室中睡眠的夜晚。使用停止信号任务结合脑电图记录,我们分离了对任务表现有贡献的不同过程,例如持续注意力、自动或自上而下的处理以及策略或自上而下的控制。在行为水平上,我们提取了反应时间、反应准确性和行为调整的标记(错误后和停止后减速),而在神经水平上,我们获得了与反应抑制(N2/P3)和错误监测(ERN/Pe)相关的事件相关电位(ERP)。
发现 24 小时的睡眠剥夺导致持续注意力下降和 P300 和 Pe 幅度减小,表明自上而下的控制逐渐崩溃。相比之下,N200 和 ERN 以及停止信号反应时间对睡眠剥夺的抵抗力更高,表明自动处理的作用。
这些结果支持这样一种观点,即睡眠剥夺对相对更依赖于心理努力和/或认知能力的认知功能的影响更大,而不是对更自动的控制过程的影响更大。