Suppr超能文献

比较三因素和五因素特质模型:与监禁罪犯样本中的精神病态和其他临床标准的关系。

Comparing the Triarchic and Five-Factor Trait Models: Relations With Psychopathy and Other Clinical Criteria in an Incarcerated Offender Sample.

机构信息

Florida State University.

University of Michigan.

出版信息

J Pers Disord. 2019 Dec;33(6):792-817. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_378. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

Abstract

This study compared how normative personality dimensions of the Five-Factor Model (FFM) and neurobehavioral traits of the triarchic model relate to psychopathic tendencies and clinical outcomes in an incarcerated sample of 277 Italian male offenders. Associations between triarchic model traits, measured using the TriPM and the FFM dimensions, measured using the NEO-FFI, were consistent with prior studies. Scores on the TriPM, particularly the Disinhibition scale, were associated with substance abuse and self-harm behavior over and above the presence of psychopathy, and beyond the personality dimensions indexed by the NEO-FFI. By contrast, the Neuroticism and Extraversion scales showed incremental validity, over and above psychopathy and TriPM scores, in predicting depressive tendencies. Lastly, both NEO-FFI and TriPM scales contributed to prediction of staff ratings of behavior in prison and prognosis for release, above and beyond psychopathy. These findings highlight potential advantages of the FFM and triarchic trait models for predicting clinical outcomes.

摘要

这项研究比较了五因素模型(FFM)的规范人格维度和三因素模型的神经行为特征与 277 名意大利男性罪犯囚犯样本中的精神病倾向和临床结果的关系。使用 TriPM 测量的三因素模型特征与使用 NEO-FFI 测量的 FFM 维度之间的关联与先前的研究一致。TriPM 的得分,特别是抑制量表,与物质滥用和自残行为有关,且超过精神病的存在,以及超过 NEO-FFI 所标记的人格维度。相比之下,神经质和外向性量表在预测抑郁倾向方面表现出增量有效性,超过了精神病和 TriPM 得分。最后,无论是 NEO-FFI 还是 TriPM 量表,都有助于预测监狱工作人员对行为的评价和释放的预后,超过了精神病的影响。这些发现强调了 FFM 和三因素特质模型在预测临床结果方面的潜在优势。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验