Gorman Johnathon, Zbarsky Steven J, Courtemanche Rebecca J M, Arneja Jugpal S, Heran Manraj K S, Courtemanche Douglas J
1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1 Canada.
2Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4 Canada.
CVIR Endovasc. 2018;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s42155-018-0009-1. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
Percutaneous sclerotherapy is the preferred method of treatment for VMs (venous malformations). However, treatment protocols vary, and research on the most effective sclerosant is conflicting. Additionally, there is limited knowledge on the effect of sclerosant volume on treatment outcome. This study aims to determine the outcomes and complications of image-guided sclerotherapy for VMs with respect to sclerosant and sclerosant volume. Towards this, a 10-year retrospective chart review was conducted of patients with VMs treated with sclerotherapy at the Vascular Anomalies Clinic at British Columbia Children's Hospital.
Thirty-four patients with VMs were treated of which 15 had a successful outcome, 13 had a failed outcome, and 6 had additional planned treatments after the study time period. Lesions on the head and neck or classified as type I or II had the highest success rates. Combination therapy with both ethanol and 3% STS (sodium tetradecyl sulphate), and ethanol alone had a higher success rate (64% and 60%) compared to 3% STS (11%). Major complications were most associated with 3% STS (17%) followed by ethanol (9%), and no major complications were found with combination. No relationship between the volume of sclerosant per lesion volume and outcome was found.
Combination and ethanol were the most effective sclerosants in terms of highest success rates and lowest complication rates, and sclerosant volume per lesion volume had no effect on outcomes. Future work should aim at studying larger sample sizes to account for the multiple factors that may influence the choice of sclerosant and treatment outcomes.
经皮硬化疗法是静脉畸形(VMs)的首选治疗方法。然而,治疗方案各不相同,关于最有效的硬化剂的研究结果相互矛盾。此外,关于硬化剂体积对治疗结果的影响的了解有限。本研究旨在确定影像引导下VMs硬化疗法在硬化剂和硬化剂体积方面的治疗结果及并发症。为此,对不列颠哥伦比亚儿童医院血管畸形诊所接受硬化疗法治疗的VMs患者进行了为期10年的回顾性病历审查。
34例VMs患者接受了治疗,其中15例治疗成功,13例治疗失败,6例在研究时间段后有额外的计划治疗。头颈部病变或分类为I型或II型的病变成功率最高。与单独使用3%十四烷基硫酸钠(STS)(11%)相比,乙醇和3% STS联合治疗以及单独使用乙醇的成功率更高(分别为64%和60%)。主要并发症大多与3% STS有关(17%),其次是乙醇(9%),联合治疗未发现主要并发症。未发现每病变体积的硬化剂体积与治疗结果之间存在关联。
就最高成功率和最低并发症率而言,联合治疗和乙醇是最有效的硬化剂,每病变体积的硬化剂体积对治疗结果没有影响。未来的工作应旨在研究更大的样本量,以考虑可能影响硬化剂选择和治疗结果的多种因素。