Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC (De Boelelaan), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Contact Dermatitis. 2019 Jun;80(6):365-373. doi: 10.1111/cod.13214. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of developing hand dermatitis (HD). Guidelines recommend moisturizers to prevent HD, but in practice their effectiveness has been poorly investigated.
To assess whether an intervention aimed at improving skin care leads to a reduction in HD severity.
In this 1-year randomized controlled trial, 9 wards (285 HCWs) were allocated to an intervention group (IG), and 10 wards (216 HCWs) were allocated to the control group (CG). The intervention included provision of cream dispensers with electronic monitoring of use, regularly communicated to the HCWs. The primary and secondary outcomes were change from baseline in Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) score (ΔHECSI) and change in natural moisturizing factor (NMF) level (ΔNMF).
At 12 months, the rates of loss to follow-up were 41% and 39% in the IG and the CG, respectively. The HECSI score was reduced in the IG by -6.2 points (95%CI: -7.7 to -4.7) and in the CG by -4.2 points (95%CI: -6.0 to -2.4). There was no significant difference in ΔHECSI or ΔNMF between the groups. Relative improvement in the HECSI score was significantly higher in the IG than in the CG (56% vs 44%). In a subgroup of HCWs with mild HD, the IG showed a larger HECSI score decrease than the CG (P < 0.001).
Although there was no significant effect on the primary outcomes, the intervention showed overall positive effects on the HECSI score.
医护人员(HCWs)有患手部皮炎(HD)的风险。指南建议使用保湿剂来预防 HD,但实际上其效果尚未得到充分研究。
评估旨在改善皮肤护理的干预措施是否会导致 HD 严重程度降低。
在这项为期 1 年的随机对照试验中,将 9 个病房(285 名 HCWs)分配到干预组(IG),将 10 个病房(216 名 HCWs)分配到对照组(CG)。干预措施包括提供带有电子使用监测器的乳膏分配器,并定期向 HCWs传达信息。主要和次要结局是基线时 Hand Eczema Severity Index(HECSI)评分的变化(ΔHECSI)和天然保湿因子(NMF)水平的变化(ΔNMF)。
在 12 个月时,IG 和 CG 的失访率分别为 41%和 39%。IG 的 HECSI 评分降低了-6.2 分(95%CI:-7.7 至-4.7),CG 降低了-4.2 分(95%CI:-6.0 至-2.4)。两组之间ΔHECSI 或ΔNMF 没有显著差异。IG 组 HECSI 评分的相对改善明显高于 CG 组(56%比 44%)。在 HD 轻度的 HCWs 亚组中,IG 显示出比 CG 更大的 HECSI 评分降低(P<0.001)。
尽管主要结局没有显著影响,但干预措施对 HECSI 评分总体上有积极影响。