Suppr超能文献

决策平衡与思考阶梯辅助 HIV 暴露前预防干预措施的采纳和维持。

Decisional Balance and Contemplation Ladder to Support Interventions for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Uptake and Persistence.

机构信息

1 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

2 Department of Psychology, Center for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies & Training, Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY), New York, New York.

出版信息

AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2019 Feb;33(2):67-78. doi: 10.1089/apc.2018.0136. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

Abstract

Fewer than 60,000 males-inclusive of all sexual identities-were prescribed HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) by mid-2017 in the United States. Efforts to increase PrEP uptake among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM), in particular, are ongoing in research and practice settings, but few tools exist to support interventions. We aimed to develop and validate tools to support motivational interviewing interventions for PrEP. In 2017, a national sample of HIV-negative GBM of relatively high socioeconomic status (n = 786) was asked about sexual behaviors that encompass Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for PrEP use, a 35-item decisional-balance scale (i.e., PrEP-DB) assessing benefits and consequences of PrEP use, and questions assessing location on the motivational PrEP cascade and derivative-the PrEP contemplation ladder. Principal axis factoring with oblique promax rotation was used for PrEP-DB construct identification and item reduction. The final 20-item PrEP-DB performed well; eigenvalues indicating a 4-factor solution provided an adequate fit to the data. Factors included the following: health benefits (α = 0.91), health consequences (α = 0.82), social benefits (α = 0.72), and social consequences (α = 0.86). Ladder scores increased across the cascade (ρ = 0.89, p < 0.001), and health benefits (β = 0.50, p < 0.001) and health consequences (β = -0.37, p < 0.001) were more strongly associated with ladder location than social benefits (β = 0.05, p > 0.05) and social consequences (β = -0.05, p > 0.05) in the fully adjusted regression model. The PrEP-DB demonstrated good reliability and predictive validity, and the ladder had strong construct validity with the motivational PrEP cascade. PrEP uptake and persistence interventions and additional empirical work could benefit from the utility of these measures.

摘要

截至 2017 年年中,美国仅有不到 6 万名男性(包括所有性取向的男性)被开具了 HIV 暴露前预防(PrEP)药物。目前,在研究和实践领域,正在努力增加男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性(GBM)人群对 PrEP 的接受程度,但支持干预的工具很少。我们旨在开发和验证支持 PrEP 动机性访谈干预的工具。2017 年,对来自具有较高社会经济地位的 HIV 阴性 GBM 的全国性样本(n=786)进行了性行为调查,这些行为涵盖了疾病预防控制中心关于 PrEP 使用的指导方针,同时还调查了一项包含 35 个条目的决策平衡量表(即 PrEP-DB),该量表评估了 PrEP 使用的利弊,以及评估处于动机性 PrEP 级联的位置以及衍生的 PrEP 思考梯级的问题。使用斜交 Promax 旋转的主成分因子分析来确定 PrEP-DB 结构并进行项目缩减。最终的 20 项 PrEP-DB 表现良好;特征值表明,四因素解决方案为数据提供了足够的拟合。这些因素包括以下方面:健康益处(α=0.91)、健康后果(α=0.82)、社会益处(α=0.72)和社会后果(α=0.86)。随着级联的推进,阶梯分数增加(ρ=0.89,p<0.001),健康益处(β=0.50,p<0.001)和健康后果(β=-0.37,p<0.001)与阶梯位置的关联度强于社会益处(β=0.05,p>0.05)和社会后果(β=-0.05,p>0.05),这在完全调整的回归模型中得到了证实。PrEP-DB 具有良好的可靠性和预测有效性,阶梯在动机性 PrEP 级联中具有很强的结构有效性。PrEP 的采用和维持干预措施以及其他实证工作可以从这些措施的实用性中受益。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验