Faiz Seyed Hamid Reza, Nader Nader D, Niknejadi Soraya, Davari-Farid Sina, Hobika Geoffrey G, Rahimzadeh Poupak
Department of Anesthesiology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Anesthesiology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
J Pain Res. 2019 Jan 4;12:201-207. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S179506. eCollection 2019.
To compare the efficacy of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric (IINB) nerve block to transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in controlling incisional pain after open inguinal hernia repair.
This was a prospective randomized clinical trial of 90 patients who received either IINB (N=45) or TAP block (N=45) using 0.2% bupivacaine 15 mL under ultrasound (US) guidance based on a random assignment in the postanesthesia care unit after having an open repair of inguinal hernia. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores were recorded immediately following, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after completion of the block. NRS scores at rest and during movement were recorded 24, 36, and 48 hours after surgery. Analgesic satisfaction level was also evaluated by a Likert-based patient questionnaire.
NRS scores were lower in the IINB group compared to the TAP block group both at rest and during movement. The difference in dynamic pain scores was statistically significant (=0.017). In addition, analgesic satisfaction was significantly greater in the IINB group than the TAP block group (mean score 2.43 vs 1.84, =0.001). Postoperative opioid requirements did not differ between the two groups.
This study demonstrated that compared to TAP block, local blockade of ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves provides better pain control after open repair of inguinal hernia when both blocks were administered under US guidance. Greater satisfaction scores also reflected superior analgesia in patients receiving IINB.
比较髂腹股沟/髂腹下神经阻滞(IINB)与腹横肌平面阻滞(TAP)在开放腹股沟疝修补术后控制切口疼痛的疗效。
这是一项前瞻性随机临床试验,90例患者在接受腹股沟疝开放修补术后,于麻醉后护理单元根据随机分配接受IINB(n = 45)或TAP阻滞(n = 45),使用0.2%布比卡因15 mL在超声(US)引导下进行。在阻滞完成后即刻、4、8、12和24小时记录数字评定量表(NRS)评分。在术后24、36和48小时记录静息和活动时的NRS评分。还通过基于李克特量表的患者问卷评估镇痛满意度。
IINB组静息和活动时的NRS评分均低于TAP阻滞组。动态疼痛评分的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.017)。此外,IINB组的镇痛满意度显著高于TAP阻滞组(平均评分2.43对1.84,P = 0.001)。两组术后阿片类药物需求量无差异。
本研究表明,与TAP阻滞相比,在超声引导下进行两种阻滞时,髂腹股沟和髂腹下神经局部阻滞在开放腹股沟疝修补术后能提供更好的疼痛控制。更高的满意度评分也反映了接受IINB的患者镇痛效果更佳。