Davison Karen M, D'Andreamatteo Carla, Mitchell Scott, Vanderkooy Pat
1School of Nursing, University of British Columbia,Vancouver,British Columbia,Canada.
3Dietitians of Canada,Toronto,Ontario,Canada.
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Mar;20(4):712-725. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002056. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
To develop a national nutrition and mental health research agenda based on the engagement of diverse stakeholders and to assess research priorities by stakeholder groups.
A staged, integrated and participatory initiative was implemented to structure a national nutrition and mental health research agenda that included: (i) national stakeholder consultations to prioritize research questions; (ii) a workshop involving national representatives from research, policy and practice to further define priorities; (iii) triangulation of data to formulate the agenda; and (iv) test hypotheses about stakeholder influences on decision making.
Canada.
Diverse stakeholders including researchers, academics, administrators, service providers, policy makers, practitioners, non-profit, industry and funding agency representatives, front-line workers, individuals with lived experience of a mental health condition and those who provide care for them.
This first-of-its-kind research priority-setting initiative showed points of agreement among diverse stakeholders (n 899) on research priorities aimed at service provision; however, respondents with lived experience of a mental health condition (themselves or a family member) placed emphasis on prevention and mental health promotion-based research. The final integrated agenda identified four research priorities, including programmes and services, service provider roles, the determinants of health and knowledge translation and exchange. These research priorities aim to identify effective models of care, enhance collaboration, inform policy makers and foster knowledge dissemination.
Since a predictor of research uptake is the involvement of relevant stakeholders, a sustained and deliberate effort must continue to engage collaboration that will lead to the optimization of nutrition and mental health-related outcomes.
基于不同利益相关者的参与制定国家营养与心理健康研究议程，并按利益相关者群体评估研究重点。
实施了一项分阶段、综合且参与性的举措，以构建国家营养与心理健康研究议程，该议程包括：（i）全国利益相关者协商，以确定研究问题的优先级；（ii）举办一次研讨会，让来自研究、政策和实践领域的国家代表进一步明确重点；（iii）对数据进行三角测量以制定议程；（iv）检验关于利益相关者对决策影响的假设。
加拿大。
不同的利益相关者，包括研究人员、学者、管理人员、服务提供者、政策制定者、从业者、非营利组织、行业和资助机构代表、一线工作者、有心理健康状况亲身经历的个人以及为他们提供护理的人员。
这项首创的研究重点设定举措显示，不同利益相关者（n = 899）在旨在提供服务的研究重点上存在共识；然而，有心理健康状况亲身经历（本人或家庭成员）的受访者强调基于预防和心理健康促进的研究。最终的综合议程确定了四个研究重点，包括项目与服务、服务提供者角色、健康决定因素以及知识转化与交流。这些研究重点旨在确定有效的护理模式、加强合作、为政策制定者提供信息并促进知识传播。
由于研究应用的一个预测因素是相关利益相关者的参与，必须持续并刻意努力促进合作，这将带来营养与心理健康相关成果的优化。
