Portalatín Edwin L, Carrazana Luis F, Colon Roberto, Abreu Ricardo, Rivera Dennys, Lojo Luis
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Portalatín, Dr. Carrazana, Dr. Colon, and Dr. Lojo), University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus, and the Orthopaedic Department, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus (Dr. Abreu and Rivera), San Juan, Puerto Rico.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Nov 2;2(11):e071. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00071. eCollection 2018 Nov.
Patient satisfaction is an increasingly emphasized measure of patient-centered care and important component of reimbursement programs. Orthopaedic surgeons are regarded as low-empathy surgeons. Our goals were to understand the role of anatomic models during the orthopaedic appointment and how their use can affect patient satisfaction and perceived empathy.
New patients at an outpatient clinic were asked to participate in a postencounter questionnaire to asses empathy perception (n = 304). Clinic days were randomly assigned to use anatomic models during the encounter to assist with clinical information transmission. The instrument provided contained Consultation and Relational Empathy questionnaire (ie, a person-centered process that was developed to measure empathy in the context of the therapeutic relationship during a one-on-one consultation between a clinician and a patient).
A total of 304 participants were included in the study. Analyses of the sociodemographic characteristics did not reveal any significant difference between the control and experimental groups. Consultation and Relational Empathy scores for the nonanatomic group (46.0 ± 9.0) and anatomic group (48.0 ± 7.7) were not statistically different ( = 0.482). The encounter time was significantly increased with the use of anatomic models ( < 0.005).
The use of anatomic models during initial orthopaedic encounter did not improve perceived empathy and satisfaction scores in our study. Longer encounter time in the orthopaedic appointment does not mean higher empathy perception.
Orthopaedic surgeons have the duty to find new strategies to improve communication with the patient. Better communication has been associated with better patient satisfaction. Further investigation should be considered to use other strategies to provide better care for our patients.
患者满意度是衡量以患者为中心的医疗服务的一项日益受到重视的指标,也是报销计划的重要组成部分。骨科医生被认为是缺乏同理心的医生。我们的目标是了解解剖模型在骨科门诊中的作用,以及其使用如何影响患者满意度和感知到的同理心。
门诊新患者被要求参与一份会诊后问卷,以评估同理心感知(n = 304)。门诊日被随机分配,在会诊期间使用解剖模型以协助临床信息传递。所提供的工具包含咨询与关系同理心问卷(即一种以患者为中心的过程,旨在测量临床医生与患者一对一咨询期间治疗关系背景下的同理心)。
本研究共纳入304名参与者。对社会人口学特征的分析未发现对照组和实验组之间有任何显著差异。非解剖模型组(46.0 ± 9.0)和解剖模型组(48.0 ± 7.7)的咨询与关系同理心得分无统计学差异(P = 0.482)。使用解剖模型时会诊时间显著增加(P < 0.005)。
在我们的研究中,骨科初次会诊期间使用解剖模型并未提高感知到的同理心和满意度得分。骨科门诊中较长的会诊时间并不意味着更高的同理心感知。
骨科医生有责任寻找新策略来改善与患者的沟通。更好的沟通与更高的患者满意度相关。应考虑进一步研究以使用其他策略为我们的患者提供更好的护理。