Dalton Kieran, O'Mahony Denis, O'Sullivan David, O'Connor Marie N, Byrne Stephen
Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Department of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Drugs Aging. 2019 Mar;36(3):279-288. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-0627-2.
Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted simultaneously in the same Irish university teaching hospital have shown that provision of Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions (STOPP)/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START) recommendations to attending prescribers by a physician or a pharmacist can reduce in-hospital adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in older adults (≥ 65 years). The aims of this study were to compare the prescriber implementation rates of STOPP/START recommendations between the physician approach and the pharmacist approach in these two RCTs and to provide a narrative summary of the comparable clinical outcomes.
Data were extracted from the two RCT published papers and their associated computerised databases to calculate the percentage prescriber implementation rates for the STOPP/START recommendations. The Chi-square test was used to quantify the differences in prescriber implementation rates, with differences considered statistically significant where p < 0.05.
Prescriber implementation rates of the STOPP and START recommendations made by the physician were 81.2% and 87.4% respectively, significantly higher than those made by the pharmacist (39.2% and 29.5% respectively), p < 0.0001. A greater absolute risk reduction in patients with ADRs was shown with the physician's intervention compared to the pharmacist's intervention (9.3% vs 6.8%).
This study shows that the methods of communication and the medium through which the STOPP/START recommendations are delivered significantly affect their implementation. Non-implementation of some pharmacist-delivered recommendations may be contributing to preventable ADRs in older adults. Thus, future research should aim to identify the factors influencing prescriber implementation of pharmacist recommendations in order to inform the design of more effective pharmacist interventions in optimising older patients' pharmacotherapy.
在爱尔兰同一所大学教学医院同时进行的两项随机对照试验(RCT)表明,由医生或药剂师向开处方者提供老年人处方筛查工具(STOPP)/提醒医生正确治疗的筛查工具(START)建议,可降低老年人(≥65岁)的院内药物不良反应(ADR)。本研究的目的是比较这两项RCT中医生方法和药剂师方法在STOPP/START建议方面的处方者实施率,并提供可比临床结果的叙述性总结。
从两项RCT发表的论文及其相关的计算机数据库中提取数据,以计算STOPP/START建议的处方者实施率百分比。采用卡方检验来量化处方者实施率的差异,p<0.05时差异被认为具有统计学意义。
医生提出的STOPP和START建议的处方者实施率分别为81.2%和87.4%,显著高于药剂师提出的实施率(分别为39.2%和29.5%),p<0.0001。与药剂师的干预相比,医生的干预在ADR患者中显示出更大的绝对风险降低(9.3%对6.8%)。
本研究表明,STOPP/START建议的沟通方式和传递媒介显著影响其实施。一些药剂师提供的建议未得到实施可能导致老年人出现可预防的ADR。因此,未来的研究应旨在确定影响处方者实施药剂师建议的因素,以便为设计更有效的药剂师干预措施提供信息,以优化老年患者的药物治疗。