• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为英国健康儿童计划2岁儿童健康与发育评估的一部分,《年龄与阶段问卷》第三版的可接受性与理解情况:家长和专业人士的观点

Acceptability and understanding of the Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition, as part of the Healthy Child Programme 2-year health and development review in England: Parent and professional perspectives.

作者信息

Kendall Sally, Nash Avril, Braun Andreas, Bastug Gonca, Rougeaux Emeline, Bedford Helen

机构信息

Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.

Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.

出版信息

Child Care Health Dev. 2019 Mar;45(2):251-256. doi: 10.1111/cch.12639.

DOI:10.1111/cch.12639
PMID:30661256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6849765/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Healthy Child Programme is the universal public health system in England to assess and monitor child health from 0 to 19. Following a review of measures for closer monitoring at age 2 years, the Department of Health for England implemented the Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ-3™; Hereon, ASQ-3).

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptability and understanding of the ASQ-3 in England by health professionals and parents.

METHOD

A mixed-methods approach was used. This paper reports on the qualitative data drawn from interviews with 40 parents and 12 focus groups with 85 health professionals. The data were analysed using applied thematic analysis.

FINDINGS

Overall, parents and health professionals found the ASQ-3 acceptable and understandable and could use it as a measure at age 2 years. The ability to work in partnership was valued. Some limitations included potential to cause anxiety, concerns around the safety of some of the items, and use of Americanized language. Health professional's training in the use the ASQ-3 was inconsistent.

CONCLUSION

The ASQ-3 is an acceptable and understandable measure to use as part of the 2-year assessment with some adaptations to the English context and some standardized training for health professionals.

摘要

背景

“健康儿童计划”是英格兰的全民公共卫生系统,用于评估和监测0至19岁儿童的健康状况。在对2岁时更密切监测措施进行审查后,英格兰卫生部实施了《年龄与阶段问卷》第三版(ASQ-3™;以下简称ASQ-3)。

目的

本研究的目的是评估健康专业人员和家长对英格兰ASQ-3的可接受性和理解程度。

方法

采用混合方法。本文报告了对40名家长的访谈以及与85名健康专业人员进行的12个焦点小组讨论得出的定性数据。使用应用主题分析法对数据进行了分析。

结果

总体而言,家长和健康专业人员认为ASQ-3是可接受且易于理解的,并且可以将其用作2岁时的一项评估工具。合作的能力受到重视。一些局限性包括可能引发焦虑、对某些项目安全性的担忧以及使用美式语言。健康专业人员在使用ASQ-3方面的培训不一致。

结论

ASQ-3是一项可接受且易于理解的评估工具,可作为2岁评估的一部分,对其进行一些针对英国情况的调整,并为健康专业人员提供一些标准化培训。

相似文献

1
Acceptability and understanding of the Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition, as part of the Healthy Child Programme 2-year health and development review in England: Parent and professional perspectives.作为英国健康儿童计划2岁儿童健康与发育评估的一部分,《年龄与阶段问卷》第三版的可接受性与理解情况:家长和专业人士的观点
Child Care Health Dev. 2019 Mar;45(2):251-256. doi: 10.1111/cch.12639.
2
Comparison of the ASQ and PEDS in screening for developmental delay in children presenting for primary care.比较 ASQ 与 PEDS 在初级保健就诊儿童发育迟缓筛查中的应用。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2011 Sep;32(7):499-511. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31822552e9.
3
Comparative Accuracy of Developmental Screening Questionnaires.发育筛查问卷的比较准确性。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Apr 1;174(4):366-374. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6000.
4
Validity of the ages and stages questionnaires in term and preterm infants.适用于足月和早产儿的年龄与阶段问卷的有效性。
Pediatrics. 2013 May;131(5):e1468-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3313. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
5
[Studies of the norm and psychometrical properties of the ages and stages questionnaires, third edition, with a Chinese national sample].[《年龄与阶段问卷》第三版在中国全国样本中的常模及心理测量学特性研究]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;53(12):913-8.
6
The psychometric properties of the Ages & Stages Questionnaires for ages 2-2.5: a systematic review.2至2.5岁年龄段与阶段问卷的心理测量特性:一项系统综述。
Child Care Health Dev. 2017 Jan;43(1):1-17. doi: 10.1111/cch.12397. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
7
The effects of military deployment on early child development.军事部署对儿童早期发育的影响。
US Army Med Dep J. 2014 Oct-Dec:81-6.
8
ASQ-3 scores are sensitive to small differences in age in a Peruvian infant population.在秘鲁婴儿群体中,ASQ-3评分对年龄上的微小差异很敏感。
Child Care Health Dev. 2017 Jul;43(4):556-565. doi: 10.1111/cch.12469. Epub 2017 May 7.
9
Concurrent validity of the ages and stages questionnaires with Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III at 2 years - Singapore cohort study.2 岁时年龄与阶段问卷与贝利婴幼儿发育量表 III 的同时效度-新加坡队列研究。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2024 Jan;65(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2023.03.013. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
10
The use of parent-completed questionnaires to investigate developmental outcomes in large populations of children exposed to antiseizure medications in pregnancy.使用家长完成的问卷来调查在怀孕期间接触抗癫痫药物的大量儿童的发育结果。
Epilepsia. 2024 Jul;65(7):2017-2029. doi: 10.1111/epi.18001. Epub 2024 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Developmental Outcomes After 50 Years of Newborn Bloodspot Screening for Classical Galactosaemia in the Republic of Ireland.爱尔兰共和国对典型半乳糖血症进行新生儿血斑筛查50年后的临床和发育结局
JIMD Rep. 2025 May 26;66(3):e70022. doi: 10.1002/jmd2.70022. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Early child development in England: cross-sectional analysis of ASQ-3 records from the 2-2½-year universal health visiting review using national administrative data (Community Service Dataset, CSDS).英格兰的幼儿发展:利用国家行政数据(社区服务数据集,CSDS)对2至2.5岁儿童普遍健康访视复查中的ASQ-3记录进行横断面分析。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2025 Feb 27;9(2):2459. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v9i2.2459. eCollection 2024.
3
What do parents, professionals and policy colleagues want from a universal assessment of child development in the early years? A qualitative study in England.家长、专业人士和政策同行对于早期儿童发展的全面评估有何期望?一项在英国开展的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 9;14(12):e091080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091080.
4
Clinical utility and psychometric properties of tools for early detection of developmental concerns and disability in young children: A scoping review.幼儿发育问题和残疾早期检测工具的临床效用及心理测量特性:一项范围综述
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025 Mar;67(3):286-306. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16076. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
5
Is it feasible to nest a Trial within a Cohort Study (TwiCS) to evaluate an early years parenting programme? A Born in Bradford's Better Start study protocol.在队列研究中嵌套一项试验(TwiCS)以评估早期育儿计划是否可行?布拉德福德出生队列的更好开端研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Jan 30;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01441-9.
6
Implementation of child-centred outcome measures in routine paediatric healthcare practice: a systematic review.在常规儿科医疗保健实践中实施以儿童为中心的结局测量指标:系统评价。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jul 3;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02143-9.
7
The influence of sociodemographic factors and response style on caregiver report of infant developmental status.社会人口统计学因素及应答方式对照顾者报告的婴儿发育状况的影响。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jan 11;10:1080163. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1080163. eCollection 2022.
8
Variation in health visiting contacts for children in England: cross-sectional analysis of the 2-2½ year review using administrative data (Community Services Dataset, CSDS).英格兰儿童健康访视接触情况的变化:使用行政数据(社区服务数据集,CSDS)对 2-2 岁半审查的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 22;12(2):e053884. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053884.
9
Agreement Between Mothers and Fieldworkers While Assessing Child Development Using Ages and Stages Questionnaires, Third Edition in Nepal.尼泊尔母亲与现场工作人员在使用《年龄与阶段问卷(第三版)》评估儿童发育时的一致性
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 12;11:579412. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579412. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
How embedded is public involvement in mainstream health research in England a decade after policy implementation? A realist evaluation.公众参与在英国主流健康研究中的嵌入程度如何?政策实施十年后的一项现实主义评估。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Apr;23(2):98-106. doi: 10.1177/1355819617750688.
2
Ages and Stages Questionnaire: a global screening scale.年龄与发育阶段问卷:一种全球筛查量表。
Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2017 Jan-Feb;74(1):5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bmhimx.2016.07.008. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
3
Validation of the Chilean version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-CL) in Community Health Settings.智利版年龄与发育阶段问卷(ASQ-CL)在社区卫生环境中的验证。
Early Hum Dev. 2015 Dec;91(12):671-6. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
4
Support for the global feasibility of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire as developmental screener.支持《年龄与阶段问卷》作为发育筛查工具在全球范围内的可行性。
Early Hum Dev. 2009 Jul;85(7):443-7. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.03.001. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
5
Communication about child development during well-child visits: impact of parents' evaluation of developmental status screener with or without an informational video.儿童健康检查期间关于儿童发育的沟通:有无信息视频情况下家长对发育状况筛查工具评估的影响
Pediatrics. 2008 Nov;122(5):e1091-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1773.
6
A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires.《挪威版年龄与发育阶段问卷》的效度研究
Acta Paediatr. 2007 May;96(5):748-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00246.x.
7
Ages and Stages Questionnaire used to measure cognitive deficit in children born extremely preterm.用于测量极早产儿认知缺陷的年龄与发育阶段问卷。
Acta Paediatr. 2005 Sep;94(9):1327-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb02095.x.
8
Parent-completed developmental screening in a Norwegian population sample: a comparison with US normative data.挪威人群样本中家长完成的发育筛查:与美国常模数据的比较。
Acta Paediatr. 2004 Nov;93(11):1525-9. doi: 10.1080/08035250410033051.