• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转发谣言:纠正错误信息失败中的意识形态不对称。

Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation.

机构信息

Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.

Princeton University, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jan;50(1):3-17. doi: 10.1177/01461672221114222. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1177/01461672221114222
PMID:36047663
Abstract

We used supervised machine-learning techniques to examine ideological asymmetries in online rumor transmission. Although liberals were more likely than conservatives to communicate in general about the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings (Study 1, = 26,422) and 2020 death of the sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein (Study 2, = 141,670), conservatives were more likely to share rumors. Rumor-spreading decreased among liberals following official correction, but it among conservatives. Marathon rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly 10 times more often post-correction. Epstein rumors were spread twice as often by conservatives pre-correction, and nearly, eight times more often post-correction. With respect to ideologically congenial rumors, conservatives circulated the rumor that the Clinton family was involved in Epstein's death 18.6 times more often than liberals circulated the rumor that the Trump family was involved. More than 96% of all fake news domains were shared by conservative Twitter users.

摘要

我们使用有监督的机器学习技术来研究网络谣言传播中的意识形态不对称。尽管在 2013 年波士顿马拉松爆炸案(研究 1,N=26422)和 2020 年性交易者杰弗里·爱泼斯坦死亡案(研究 2,N=141670)中,自由派比保守派更有可能普遍传播信息,但保守派更有可能传播谣言。在官方纠正后,自由派传播谣言的情况有所减少,但保守派则不然。在未经修正的情况下,保守派传播马拉松谣言的频率是自由派的两倍,修正后的频率则是自由派的近 10 倍。在未经修正的情况下,保守派传播爱泼斯坦谣言的频率是自由派的两倍,修正后的频率则是自由派的近 8 倍。在涉及意识形态一致的谣言方面,保守派传播克林顿家族与爱泼斯坦之死有关的谣言的频率是自由派传播特朗普家族与爱泼斯坦之死有关的谣言的 18.6 倍。超过 96%的虚假新闻域名是由保守派推特用户分享的。

相似文献

1
Rumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation.转发谣言:纠正错误信息失败中的意识形态不对称。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jan;50(1):3-17. doi: 10.1177/01461672221114222. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
2
Hot Topic Recognition of Health Rumors Based on Anti-Rumor Articles on the WeChat Official Account Platform: Topic Modeling.基于微信公众号反谣言文章的健康谣言热点话题识别:主题建模。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 21;25:e45019. doi: 10.2196/45019.
3
Partisan asymmetries in exposure to misinformation.党派之间在接触错误信息方面的不对称性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 19;12(1):15671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19837-7.
4
Ideological asymmetries in online hostility, intimidation, obscenity, and prejudice.网络仇恨、恐吓、淫秽和偏见中的意识形态不对称。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 15;13(1):22345. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46574-2.
5
Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?从左到右发推文:网络政治交流是否不止是一个回音室?
Psychol Sci. 2015 Oct;26(10):1531-42. doi: 10.1177/0956797615594620. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
6
Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on Facebook.在 Facebook 上接触政治新闻时存在不对称的意识形态隔离。
Science. 2023 Jul 28;381(6656):392-398. doi: 10.1126/science.ade7138. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
7
Dynamic graph convolutional networks with attention mechanism for rumor detection on social media.基于注意力机制的动态图卷积网络用于社交媒体谣言检测
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 18;16(8):e0256039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256039. eCollection 2021.
8
Monitoring Misinformation on Twitter During Crisis Events: A Machine Learning Approach.监测危机事件中的推特虚假信息:一种机器学习方法。
Risk Anal. 2022 Aug;42(8):1728-1748. doi: 10.1111/risa.13634. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
9
Of pandemics, politics, and personality: The role of conscientiousness and political ideology in the sharing of fake news.论大流行病、政治和人格:尽责性和政治意识形态在假新闻传播中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 May;151(5):1154-1177. doi: 10.1037/xge0001120. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
10
The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum.自由派和保守派的道德刻板印象:政治光谱上差异的夸大。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050092. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Fact-checking information from large language models can decrease headline discernment.对来自大语言模型的信息进行事实核查可能会降低标题辨别能力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Dec 10;121(50):e2322823121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322823121. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
2
The inhibitory impact of collaboration on the continued influence effect of misinformation.协作对错误信息持续影响效应的抑制作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 25;15:1487146. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1487146. eCollection 2024.
3
Differences in misinformation sharing can lead to politically asymmetric sanctions.
信息错误传播的差异可能导致政治上的非对称制裁。
Nature. 2024 Oct;634(8034):609-616. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07942-8. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
4
Bypassing as a non-confrontational influence strategy.回避:一种非对抗性的影响策略。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Oct;59:101855. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101855. Epub 2024 Jul 31.