Gortner S R, Gilliss C L, Shinn J A, Sparacino P A, Rankin S, Leavitt M, Price M, Hudes M
School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco.
J Adv Nurs. 1988 Sep;13(5):649-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1988.tb01459.x.
To enhance individual and family health during recovery from heart surgery, this study employed nursing interventions based on self-efficacy and family stress theory during the hospitalization period and for 3 months thereafter. The effectiveness of the interventions were assessed through a randomized trial in which 67 prospective bypass and valve surgery patients, aged 30-77 years, and their spouses, were allocated either the experimental interventions or usual care and followed for 6 months. At 3 months post-surgery, the only statistically significant differences between the experimentals and controls were on perceived self-efficacy for lifting and tolerating emotional distress. At 6 months no significant differences were found on individual or family measures. Analyses revealed that age, gender and preoperative cardiac status significantly affected individual recovery. The study is continuing with a larger sample in order to explicate the recovery process and to better determine whether a low intensity nursing intervention can effect changes in individual and family recovery.
为了在心脏手术康复期间增进个体及家庭健康,本研究在住院期间及之后3个月采用了基于自我效能感和家庭压力理论的护理干预措施。通过一项随机试验评估干预措施的效果,该试验将67名年龄在30 - 77岁的前瞻性搭桥手术和瓣膜手术患者及其配偶分为试验性干预组或常规护理组,并随访6个月。术后3个月,试验组和对照组之间唯一具有统计学显著差异的是在提起重物和耐受情绪困扰方面的自我效能感认知。6个月时,在个体或家庭指标方面未发现显著差异。分析表明,年龄、性别和术前心脏状况显著影响个体康复。该研究正在继续招募更大的样本,以阐明康复过程,并更好地确定低强度护理干预是否能影响个体和家庭康复情况。