• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Time Use and Experienced Wellbeing of Older Caregivers: A Sequence Analysis.老年人照顾者的时间利用与体验幸福感:序列分析。
Gerontologist. 2019 Sep 17;59(5):e441-e450. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny175.
2
Correlates of caregivers' involvement in the management of older adults' medications.照顾者参与老年人药物管理的相关因素。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Jul-Aug;13(4):840-848. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
3
Family and Other Unpaid Caregivers and Older Adults with and without Dementia and Disability.有或没有痴呆症及残疾的老年人的家庭及其他无薪照料者
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Aug;65(8):1821-1828. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14910. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
4
The impact of the quality of relationship on the experiences and wellbeing of caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review.关系质量对痴呆症患者照料者经历及幸福感的影响:一项系统综述
Aging Ment Health. 2009 Mar;13(2):143-54. doi: 10.1080/13607860802459799.
5
Positive and negative outcomes of informal caregiving at home and in institutionalised long-term care: a cross-sectional study.家庭及机构化长期护理中非正式照护的积极与消极结果:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0620-3.
6
Health and wellbeing in informal caregivers and non-caregivers: a comparative cross-sectional study of the Swedish general population.非正式照料者和非照料者的健康与幸福:瑞典普通人群的比较横断面研究
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Jul 29;13:109. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0309-2.
7
Variability in spousal perceptions of caregiving and its relationship to older caregiver health outcomes.配偶对照顾的感知存在差异及其与老年照顾者健康结果的关系。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1504-1511. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4408-8. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
8
The types of caregiving reactions experienced by the older spouse caregivers.老年配偶照顾者所经历的照顾反应类型。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Dec;28(23-24):4538-4548. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15044. Epub 2019 Sep 15.
9
Development and validation of a screener based on interRAI assessments to measure informal caregiver wellbeing in the community.基于 interRAI 评估的筛查工具的开发和验证,用于衡量社区中非正式照护者的健康状况。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Dec 13;18(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0986-x.
10
The impact of motivations and meanings on the wellbeing of caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review.动机和意义对痴呆症患者照顾者的幸福感的影响:系统评价。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 Feb;22(1):43-55. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209990810. Epub 2009 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiotherapy Training Program Defects in Geriatrics: A Qualitative Study.老年医学物理治疗培训项目的缺陷:一项定性研究。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024 Dec 10;38:145. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.38.145. eCollection 2024.
2
A Novel Time Use Approach on Daily Active Engagement With Life: The Intersectionality of Race and Gender.一种关于日常积极参与生活的新型时间利用方法:种族与性别的交叉性
Gerontologist. 2024 Dec 13;65(1). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae150.
3
Daily activities of older adults before and during the COVID pandemic.老年人在 COVID 大流行之前和期间的日常活动。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Aug 1;79(8). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae076.
4
Prevalence Estimates of Arthritis and Activity-Limiting Pain Among Family Caregivers to Older Adults.老年人家庭照料者中关节炎和活动受限性疼痛的流行率估计。
Gerontologist. 2024 May 1;64(5). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad124.
5
Work as Overload or Enhancement for Family Caregivers of Older Adults: Assessment of Experienced Well-Being Over the Day.作为老年人家庭照顾者的工作负荷或增强因素:一天中体验到的幸福感评估。
J Marriage Fam. 2023 May;85(3):760-781. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12909. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
6
Informal caregiving, time use and experienced wellbeing.非正式照护、时间利用与体验幸福感。
Health Econ. 2023 Feb;32(2):356-374. doi: 10.1002/hec.4624. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
7
A Comparison of Methods for Identifying Informal Carers: Self-Declaration Versus a Time Diary.一种识别非正式照顾者的方法比较:自我声明与时间日记。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Jun;40(6):611-621. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01136-8. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
8
A day in the life of caregivers to older adults with and without dementia: Comparisons of care time and emotional health.照顾有痴呆和无痴呆的老年患者的照护者的日常生活:照护时间和情绪健康的比较。
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Sep;18(9):1650-1661. doi: 10.1002/alz.12550. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
9
The experiences of older individuals providing care to older dependents: A phenomenological study in Spain.老年人照顾老年依赖者的体验:西班牙的一项现象学研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):e0255600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255600. eCollection 2021.
10
Exploring daily time-use patterns: ATUS-X data extractor and online diary visualization tool.探索日常时间利用模式:ATUS-X 数据提取器和在线日记可视化工具。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 16;16(6):e0252843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252843. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring Experiential Well-Being among Older Adults.衡量老年人的体验幸福感。
J Posit Psychol. 2019;14(4):538-547. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2018.1497686. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
2
Daily Temporal Pathways: A Latent Class Approach to Time Diary Data.每日时间路径:一种对时间日记数据的潜在类别分析方法。
Soc Indic Res. 2018 Jan;135(1):117-142. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1469-0. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
3
Reliability, Validity, and Variability of the Subjective Well-Being Questions in the 2010 American Time Use Survey.2010年美国时间使用调查中主观幸福感问题的信度、效度和变异性
Soc Indic Res. 2016 Apr 1;126(3):1355-1373. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0923-8. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
4
A National Profile of Family and Unpaid Caregivers Who Assist Older Adults With Health Care Activities.协助老年人进行医疗保健活动的家庭及无薪照料者的全国概况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176(3):372-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7664.
5
Caregiver burden: a clinical review.照顾者负担:临床综述。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1052-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.304.
6
Is spousal caregiving associated with enhanced well-being? New evidence from the panel study of income dynamics.配偶护理与幸福感增强有关吗?来自收入动态面板研究的新证据。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Nov;69(6):861-9. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu004. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
7
A dimensional analysis of caregiver burden among spouses and adult children.配偶和成年子女照顾者负担的维度分析。
Gerontologist. 2011 Jun;51(3):321-31. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq102. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
8
A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method.一种描述日常生活体验的调查方法:日记重建法。
Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1776-80. doi: 10.1126/science.1103572.
9
Associations of caregiver stressors and uplifts with subjective well-being and depressive mood: a meta-analytic comparison.照顾者压力源与积极因素与主观幸福感和抑郁情绪的关联:一项元分析比较
Aging Ment Health. 2004 Sep;8(5):438-49. doi: 10.1080/13607860410001725036.
10
The stress process.应激过程。
J Health Soc Behav. 1981 Dec;22(4):337-56.

老年人照顾者的时间利用与体验幸福感:序列分析。

Time Use and Experienced Wellbeing of Older Caregivers: A Sequence Analysis.

机构信息

Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Jennifer Cornman Consulting, Granville, Ohio.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2019 Sep 17;59(5):e441-e450. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny175.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gny175
PMID:30668685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7182009/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The diminished wellbeing of caregivers is well documented, but studies typically draw upon coarse measures of time use and thus provide limited understanding of the role of specific care activities in the daily lives of care providers. This study uses time diary data to explore whether there are signature care patterns throughout the day and whether these care patterns have implications for caregivers' experienced wellbeing.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Using a national sample of 511 time diaries from older caregivers in the Disability and Use of Time supplement to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, we examine minutes of care provided on the prior day, overall and for four broad care categories (household, personal care, transportation, and visiting), and patterns of care over the day, the latter based on sequence and cluster analysis.

RESULTS

Older caregivers spend on average 2.3 hr providing care to another adult on care days. Caregiving follows a roller-coaster pattern over the day, peaking at mealtimes. Sequence analysis suggests five distinctive caregiving patterns, which vary by both demographic characteristics of the caregiver (gender, work status) and care arrangement type (relationship to recipient, whether sole caregiver to recipient). The 40% who provide only marginal assistance of about 1 hr report lower experienced wellbeing than the 28% who provide sporadic assistance with a mix of activities for about 2 hr.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

A substantial share of older caregivers provides only 1 hr of assistance on a given day but appears to be at risk for reduced wellbeing. Better understanding of the reason for their marginal involvement and reduced wellbeing is warranted.

摘要

背景与目的

照料者的幸福感下降已得到充分证实,但这些研究通常依赖于粗略的时间使用测量方法,因此对特定照料活动在照料者日常生活中的作用的理解有限。本研究使用时间日记数据来探讨全天是否存在典型的照料模式,以及这些照料模式是否对照料者的体验幸福感有影响。

研究设计与方法

我们使用来自收入动态面板研究残疾和时间补充调查的 511 份全国性时间日记样本,研究了前一天提供的护理分钟数,总体护理和四个广泛的护理类别(家务、个人护理、交通和探访),以及全天的护理模式,后者基于序列和聚类分析。

结果

老年照料者在护理日平均每天提供 2.3 小时的护理。全天的护理呈过山车模式,在进餐时间达到高峰。序列分析表明,有五种不同的护理模式,这些模式因照料者的人口特征(性别、工作状态)和护理安排类型(与受护者的关系、是否是受护者的唯一照料者)而异。提供约 1 小时少量帮助的 40%的人报告的体验幸福感低于提供约 2 小时混合活动间歇性帮助的 28%的人。

讨论与意义

相当一部分老年照料者在特定的一天只提供 1 小时的帮助,但他们似乎有降低幸福感的风险。需要更好地理解他们参与度低和幸福感降低的原因。